Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-18
Status INACTIVE
Type Workmans Comp. Adm. Appeal
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Linda Spisak
Defendant Renhill Holdings, Inc.|Bureau Of Workers' Compensation Stephanie Mccloud Administrator
Photo of Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Judge

Hon. DEENA R CALABRESE

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53938472) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRITTANY H. ASMUS [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53938471) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CHARLES J GALLO [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53938470) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CHARLES J GALLO [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53938469) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SANDRA L NIMRICK [email protected]
  6. PURSUANT TO DISMISSAL ENTRY FILED 05/29/2024, CASE SETTLED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES. NO RECORD. COSTS ARE TO BE PAID BY PLAINTIFF. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. STIPULATION FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY SANDRA L NIMRICK 0042540 AGREED STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
  8. PURSUANT TO ENTRY DATED 01/29/2024, CASE SETTLED AT MEDIATION, WITH PARTIES TO SUBMIT FURTHER ENTRY. COURT TO RETAIN JURISDICTION. COURT COST ASSESSED AS DIRECTED. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. MEDIATION HEARING HELD. THE PARTIES IN THE CAPTIONED CASE HAVE REACHED A SETTLEMENT AND AGREE TO SUBMIT THE DISMISSAL ENTRY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. MEDIATION SET FOR 01/24/2024 AT 01:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  11. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE HELD ON 10/13/2023. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATED BY VIDEO CONFERENCE. ALL DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 01/12/2024. PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 01/12/2024. DEFENDANT'S EXPERT REPORT DUE 02/29/2024. CASE REFERRED TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION MEDIATOR ON 10/13/2023. MEDIATION TO BE CONDUCTED IN JANUARY 2024. COUNSEL ARE TO PROMPTLY CONTACT THE MEDIATION DEPARTMENT TO SECURE A FIRM DATE FOR MEDIATION. JURY TRIAL SET FOR 05/15/2024 AT 09:30 AM. ANY MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SHALL BE MADE IN WRITING AND CAPTIONED "MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE." IF ALL PARTIES OR CERTAIN PARTIES AGREE TO THE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE, SUCH AGREEMENT SHALL BE REFLECTED IN THE CAPTION. THE COURT WILL NOT RULE ON AMBIGUOUSLY TITLED MOTIONS WHICH ARE, IN EFFECT, MOTIONS FOR A CONTINUANCE (E.G., A MOTION TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE). ANY MOTION FILED WHICH DOES NOT FULFILL THE CRITERIA ABOVE WILL BE SUMMARILY DENIED OR STRICKEN. THE PARTIES ARE FURTHER DIRECTED TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH THE COURT'S STANDING ORDER ON LITIGATION PREFERENCES, AVAILABLE AS OF THIS WRITING AT HTTPS://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/COURT-RESOURCES/JUDGES/JUDGE-DEENA-R-CALABRESE. THE PARTIES ARE EXPECTED TO REVIEW THE STANDING ORDER REGULARLY FOR UPDATES. THE STANDING ORDER APPLIES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SUPERSEDED BY JOURNAL ENTRY. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/13/2023 AT 11:30 AM. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ORDER SPECIFICALLY REFERENCES CIVIL RULE 26 AS AMENDED EFFECTIVE JULY 2020, IN PARTICULAR THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE PARTIES FILE A WRITTEN DISCOVERY PLAN. THE CMC WILL BE CONDUCTED AS A VIDEO CONFERENCE. DO NOT APPEAR IN PERSON. PLEASE LOG IN TO THE CONFERENCE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME BY VISITING HTTPS://ZOOM.US/JOIN AND ENTERING THE FOLLOWING MEETING CREDENTIALS: MEETING ID: 862 5784 3639 PASSCODE: 241399 THE URL BELOW SHOULD PROVIDE ONE-CLICK ACCESS TO THE CONFERENCE, BUT PLEASE RELY ON THE MEETING ID AND PASSCODE ABOVE IF THE URL PROMPTS YOU FOR AN ID OR PASSCODE, OR RETURNS AN ERROR: HTTPS://US02WEB.ZOOM.US/J/86257843639?PWD=N3D5SHZLQYTLDLPPNTCXVFK5AVJKZZ09 TO DISCOURAGE ABUSE, ALL COUNSEL AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS PARTICIPATING MUST HAVE AN ACCOUNT WITH THE ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCING SERVICE (HTTPS://ZOOM.US/). A PAID ZOOM ACCOUNT IS NOT REQUIRED; THE FREE TIER IS SUFFICIENT. PRIOR TO THE EVENT, PLEASE DOWNLOAD ZOOM TO A COMPUTER OR MOBILE DEVICE WITH A CAMERA, MICROPHONE, AND SPEAKERS. NEXT, ENSURE INTERNET BROWSER POP-UP BLOCKERS ARE DISABLED FOR ZOOM. FINALLY, CHECK THE CAMERA, MICROPHONE, AND SPEAKERS ON YOUR DEVICE TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE WORKING. IN ADVANCE OF THE CONFERENCE, COUNSEL AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES SHALL CONFER IN ACCORDANCE WITH OHIO R. CIV. P. 26(F)(1)-(2), AND SHALL THEREAFTER FILE A DISCOVERY PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH OHIO R. CIV. P. 26(F)(3). THE WRITTEN RULE 26(F) DISCOVERY PLAN SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN THREE BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. DURING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, SERVICE ISSUES, DISCOVERY PROGRESS AND SCHEDULE, AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY, EXCHANGE OF EXPERT REPORTS, DATE FOR FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO ARBITRATION, ETC., SHALL BE RESOLVED AND INCLUDED IN A BINDING DECREE AND ORDER FORMALIZED. ALL COUNSEL PARTICIPATING SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO A BINDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. THE PARTIES SHOULD NOT WAIT FOR THE CMC BEFORE BEGINNING TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY. EXCEPT IN COMPLEX CASES, TRIAL WILL BE SCHEDULED 7 TO 9 MONTHS OUT, WITH FINAL PRETRIALS AND/OR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES SCHEDULED FROM 2 TO 6 WEEKS PRIOR TO TRIAL. ANY PARTY WHO FAILS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CMC WILL BE DEEMED TO HAVE ACCEPTED THE SCHEDULING ORDER ESTABLISHED BY THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. ANSWER FILED BY D1 RENHILL HOLDINGS, INC. ATTORNEY BRITTANY H. ASMUS 0095142 ANSWER RENHILL HOLDINGS, INC.
  14. ANSWER FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY SANDRA L NIMRICK 0042540 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT, ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
  15. USPS RECEIPT NO. 51436352 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/24/2023 RENHILL HOLDINGS, INC. PROCESSED BY COC 08/30/2023.
  16. SUMS COMPLAINT(51436353) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 30 WEST SPRING ST. COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  17. SUMS COMPLAINT(51436352) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RENHILL HOLDINGS, INC. 2650 N. REYNOLDS RD. TOLEDO, OH 43615
  18. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  20. WRIT FEE
  21. WRIT FEE
  22. JUDGE DEENA R CALABRESE ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  23. LEGAL RESEARCH
  24. LEGAL NEWS
  25. LEGAL AID
  26. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  27. COMPUTER FEE
  28. CLERK'S FEE
  29. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID CHARLES J GALLO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more