Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Windham County

Court

Windham County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-17
Type P 10 Property Partition
Docket 40 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Peter Gunn
Defendant Ismel Espinal Polanco|Yohenis Mancebo Hodelin

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. RDER RESULT: Granted 9/24/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. PPEARANCE Appearance
  4. PPEARANCE Appearance
  5. ETURN OF SERVICE
  6. NSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  7. EPLY TO SPECIAL DEFENSE
  8. ERTIFICATE OF CLOSED PLEADINGS AND CLAIM FOR TRIAL LIST
  9. OTICE of service of Interrogatories & Requests for Production - Ismel Espinal Polanco
  10. OTICE of service of Interrogatories & Requests for Production - Yohenis Mancebo Hodelin
  11. OTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD - 13-6/13-9)
  12. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  13. OTION FOR ORDER Pursuant to Practice Book Sec. 13-14. RESULT: Denied 3/18/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  14. RDER RESULT: Denied 3/18/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  15. BJECTION TO MOTION RESULT: Sustained 3/18/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  16. RDER RESULT: Sustained 3/18/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  17. CHEDULING ORDER
  18. OTICE OF COMPLIANCE
  19. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Written Discovery Requests and Amend Scheduling Order RESULT: Order 6/30/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  20. RDER RESULT: Order 6/30/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  21. BJECTION TO MOTION RESULT: Order 6/30/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  22. RDER RESULT: Order 6/30/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  23. OTICE Service of Interrogatories and Requests for Production on the Plaintiff
  24. OTION FOR ORDER RESULT: Denied 8/22/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  25. RDER RESULT: Denied 8/22/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  26. BJECTION TO MOTION Objection to Motion for Order
  27. BJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10
  28. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Granted 10/15/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  29. RDER RESULT: Granted 10/15/2024 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  30. OTION FOR CONTINUANCE RESULT: Order 3/17/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  31. RDER RESULT: Order 3/17/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  32. ISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS
  33. OTION FOR SANCTIONS - PB SEC 13-4 (EXPERT)
  34. EQUEST TO AMEND AND AMENDMENT REQUEST TO AMEND SPECIAL DEFENSES
  35. BJECTION TO REQUEST TO AMEND
  36. BJECTION Objection to Motion to Preclude
  37. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 4/29/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  38. RDER RESULT: Granted 4/29/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT
  39. RIAL MANAGEMENT REPORT
  40. ASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RESULT: Granted 9/24/2025 HON MARK ALTERMATT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more