Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-28
Status 04/21/2023
Type Appeal From Administrative Agency (3 An)|Administrative Agency Appeal Other
Docket 46 entries
Photo of Hon. Ramgren Peter R

Judge

Hon. Ramgren Peter R

Anchorage Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Initial Judicial Assignment: Honorable Adolf Zeman
  2. Notice of Appeal from Administrative Agency
  3. Cash Deposit Appeal Posted Receipt: 2079012 Date: 04/17/2023
  4. Motion to Waive or Reduce Cost Bond Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #1
  5. Financial Statement - CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT Access to confidential documents limited to (1) Parties to Action, (2) Counsel of Record, and (3) Court Personnel. Administrative Bulletin No. 48, Standard 7
  6. Notice of Appeal Deficiency: Filing fee of $250, or a request that the judge waive the filing fee. Admin. Rules 9 and 10. Notice of Appeal Deficiency (9/15) Sent on: 03/13/2023 15:22:09.37
  7. Motion/ Order to Compel Discovery Request of Documents/ Emails/ Video from Right of Way "Exhibit A" Dated 2-9-23 Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Filing Party: Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #2
  8. {CURED 6/19/23] Deficiency Memo mailed re: ACTION NEEDED TO CORRECT FILING You have recently submitted documents related to the above case. These documents are either incomplete or do not follow correct procedures. Please do the following: 1 Please file a proposed order for your motion to compel filed on 3-13-23. Civil Deficiency Memo (1/22) Sent on: 03/14/2023 12:51:36.64
  9. Request for Exemption from Payment of Fees: Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Filing Party: Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #3
  10. Order Granting Motion Case Motion #3: Request for Exemption from Payment of Fees:
  11. Order Granting Motion Case Motion #1: Motion to Waive or Reduce Cost Bond
  12. Notice of Change of Judge (Peremptory Challenge) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant);
  13. Motion for Dismissal for U.S. Constitutional Violation 4 and 6 Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Filing Party: Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #4
  14. Notice of Change of Judge (Peremptory Challenge)- Granted
  15. Administrative Judicial Reassignment: Honorable Judge Peter Ramgren
  16. Letter or Other Correspondence Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant);
  17. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed re: SERVICE/FILING: You must give the other side in the case copies of every document you file in court. This is called “service.” You must fill out the certificate of service section at the end of the form or file a separate certificate of service form listing: the documents served, who you served, when you did service, and how you provided copies to the other side in the case. You may use the court’s Certificate of Service (form TF-700), available at: https://public.courts.alaska.gov/web/forms/docs/tf-700.pdf. Serve by first-class mail or hand-delivery unless otherwise ordered by the court. Or, if the other side agreed to service by fax or e-mail by checking that option in the person’s initial filing (or by filing a separate notice of consent), then you may serve by that method instead. Civil Rules 5(f) and 5.1(c)(3). FORMAT/PROCEDURE: It is unclear what you are filing. If you want to file a notice, please use the TF-705 form. Civil Deficiency Memo (1/22) Sent on: 05/15/2023 09:23:41.98
  18. Proposed Order Re: Motion to Compel Discovery Request of Documents/ Emails/ Video from Right of Way "Exhibit A" Dated February 9, 2023 (Linked to Motion #2) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Case Motion #2: Motion/ Order to Compel Discovery Request of Documents/ Emails/ Video from Right of Way "Exhibit A" Dated 2-9-23 - Lacks Proposed Order c/s 3-13-23
  19. Miscellaneous (linked to motion) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Case Motion #2: Motion/ Order to Compel Discovery Request of Documents/ Emails/ Video from Right of Way "Exhibit A" Dated 2-9-23 - Lacks Proposed Order c/s 3-13-23
  20. Order Granting Motion/ Order to Compel Discovery Request of Documents/ Emails/ Video from Right of Way "Exhibit A" Dated 2-9-23 Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #2 Motion/ Order to Compel Discovery Request of Documents/ Emails/ Video from Right of Way "Exhibit A" Dated 2-9-23
  21. NOTICE OF INTENT TO RULE
  22. Response to: "Notice of Intent to Rule" (no motion link) Attorney: Arms, Quincy Hansell (1012115) Municipality of Anchorage (Appellee);
  23. Objections to MOA Memo Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant);
  24. LODGED: Motion for Default Judgment Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Filing Party: Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #5
  25. Civil Deficiency Memo mailed to Dion Humphrey RE: Service on the Municipality of Anchorage 1 It has been brought to the Court’s attention in the Municipality of Anchorage’s Response to "Notice of Intent to Rule" filed on July 10, 2023 that they are not receiving filings regarding this case. From this point forward, please include email addresses [email protected] & [email protected] for the Municipality of Anchorage when e-filing court documents. Thank you. Civil Deficiency Memo (1/22) Sent on: 07/18/2023 16:32:15.70 Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant);
  26. AMENDED Notice mailed to Dion Humphrey RE: Service on the Municipality of Anchorage (as to correct email address for MOA) 2nd Amended Notice e-mailed to Dion Humphrey & MOA Re: Updated information from the Municipality of Anchorage Re: the proper email address for Admin/Civil Appeals. 1 Per Municipality of Anchorage as of 07/20/2023, the proper email address for service by email for this type of appeal is: [email protected]. Civil Deficiency Memo (1/22) Sent on: 07/20/2023 15:52:02.26 Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant) & Courtesy Copy to Municipality of Anchorage
  27. [Amended] Motion for Default Judgment (linked to motion #5) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Case Motion #5: LODGED: Motion for Default Judgment
  28. Motion for Default Clarification Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Filing Party: Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #6
  29. Notice of Intent to Dismiss
  30. Proof of Service on Appellee Requested by Judge Peter R. Ramgren Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant);
  31. Notice Regarding Service of Process and Intent to Dismiss
  32. Attorney Information Attorney Gunther, Charles J representing Appellee Municipality of Anchorage as of 11/30/2023
  33. Supplemental Proof of Service on Appellee Requested by Judge Peter R. Ramgren (Exhibit 79 MOA Date Stamp February 28, 2023) Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001)
  34. Proof of Service from MOA Kathi Flander Email Exhibit 80 Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001)
  35. "Clarification on Supplemental Proof of Service and Proof of Service Citation Not Being Rules of Appellate but Derived from Applellate Rules Under 602 and AP-210 Appellant Instructions" Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant);
  36. "Clarification to Judge Ramgren Notice Regarding Service of Process and Intent to Dismiss" Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant);
  37. "Request the Courts to Grant Plaintiff's Default Motion Against MOA" (linked to motion #5) Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Case Motion #5: LODGED: Motion for Default Judgment
  38. ORDER Case Motion #4: Motion for Dismissal for U.S. Constitutional Violation 4 and 6, Case Motion #5: LODGED: Motion for Default Judgment, Case Motion #6: Motion for Default Clarification
  39. Order Denying Motion for Dismissal for U.S. Constitutional Violation 4 and 6 Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #4 Motion for Dismissal for U.S. Constitutional Violation 4 and 6
  40. Order Denying Motion for Default Judgment Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #5 LODGED: Motion for Default Judgment
  41. Order Denying Motion for Default Clarification Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #6 Motion for Default Clarification
  42. Petition for Writ of Mandamus Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) Filing Party: Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #7
  43. DECISION ON ORDER Case Motion #7: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
  44. Order Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #7 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
  45. Plaintiff's Request to Higher Court for Review/Consideration Self-Represented (0100001) Dion Kirk Humphrey (Appellant); Filing Party: Humphrey, Dion Kirk Case Motion #8
  46. Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration Case Motion #8: Plaintiff's Request to Higher Court for Review/Consideration

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more