Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-08-05
Status Pending
Type 22 Cv Auto Civil Unlimited
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff United Wisconsin Insurance Company, Administered By American Claims Management
Defendant Four Star Fruit, Inc.|Murillo, Carlos
Photo of Hon. Clark, Thomas S.|Brumfield, Lorna H.|Chapin, Sidney P.

Judge

Hon. Clark, Thomas S.|Brumfield, Lorna H.|Chapin, Sidney P.

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 11/28/23 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: 17
  2. Unserved Unserved
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  4. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM
  7. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Caption box does not conform exact to the Complaint. Please review/correct Defendants last name and re-file.
  8. Comment Response to Order to Show Cause
  9. View Document Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) 02/13/2024 View Document Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) 04/02/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment RE: 2ND SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $250.00 AS TO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF FOR FAILING TO APPEAR 02/13/2024
  10. Comment (Four Star Fruit, Inc.)
  11. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Attorney for section reflects second defendant who has not appeared in the case "Carlos Murillo".
  12. Comment Response TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SERVICE
  13. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer was filed 04/18/2024. If amending specify that. Caption as to the answer and cross complaint does not conform exact to complaint filed 08/10/2023. Review verbiage as to "Carlos".
  14. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 11/28/2023 View Document Order to Show Cause (Pre-Disposition) 04/02/2024 View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 07/18/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment continued from 04/02/2024
  15. Comment BCV-23-103386
  16. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- Caption does not conform exact to complaint. Review verbiage as to all parties including the " does". Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint. Defendants name does not conform to complaint. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated.
  17. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer to Complaint, Envelope Id# 16032363 Defendant name does not conform to the complaint. Defendant was sued as "Carlos Murallo". Please indicate "erroneously sued" along with the true name of the defendant.
  18. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - Defendants name does not conform to the complaint. Defendant was sued as "Carlos Murallo". Review/ Correct and re-submit.
  19. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer - proof of service is missing.
  20. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 08/05/2024
  21. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Summons - cross complaint -does not conform exact to the cross complaint. Please review party information.
  22. View Document Ruling 08/07/2024 Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Ruling Comment Notice of Related Case and reset CMC
  23. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Stipulation and order to Consolidate
  24. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment continued from04/02/2024, 07/18/2024
  25. View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 07/18/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment continued from 07/18/2024
  26. View Document Ruling 08/07/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more