Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-28
Status Open
Type Guardianship Person Only
Docket 67 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Luna, Destiny|De Grise, Tracey L.|Luna, Jose
Photo of Hon. Cardoza, Jane A

Judge

Hon. Cardoza, Jane A

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Letters of Guardianship
  2. Comment (cc in pick-up box)
  3. Order Granting Waiver of Court Fees and Cost Signed
  4. Confidential Guardian Screening Form
  5. Confidential Guardian Screening Form
  6. Declaration of Due Diligence
  7. Comment as to: Father, Unknown
  8. Duties of Guardian
  9. Consent, Nomination and Waiver of Notice
  10. Comment Consent: /s/ Destiny Luna Nomination: Waiver of notice of hearing:
  11. Dec. Under Uniform Child Custody & Jurisdict & Enforce Act
  12. Declaration
  13. Petition for Appointment of Temporary Guardian of the Person
  14. Order (Generic)
  15. Judicial Officer Arax, Brian M
  16. Comment Ex Parte Order on Petition for Appointment of Temporary Guardian THE COURT FINDS: Facts stated are INSUFFICIENT to support appointment of a temporary guardian ex parte. THE COURT ORDERS: Temporary Petition is DENIED cc mailed
  17. Petition for Appt. of Guardian of the Person (Subsequent)
  18. Comment cc in pick up box
  19. Declaration of Due Diligence
  20. Comment as to: Father cc in pick up box
  21. Confidential Guardian Screening Form
  22. Comment cc in pick up box
  23. Consent, Nomination and Waiver of Notice
  24. Comment Consent: Jose Luna Nomination: Jose Luna Waiver of notice of hearing: Jose Luna cc in pick up box Destiny Luna
  25. Duties of Guardian
  34. Comment Fees waived
  35. Petition - Appoint Guardian
  36. Judicial Officer Arax, Brian M
  37. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  38. Result Heard
  39. Comment Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person (Initial)
  40. Appeared in Person
  41. Minute Order Attachment
  42. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  43. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the C.I. Report was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on ( ) . Parties served: ( )
  44. Confidential Court Investigation Report
  45. Comment Fee waived
  46. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  47. Comment of CI Report
  48. Petition - Appoint Guardian
  49. Original Type Petition - Appoint Guardian
  50. Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane
  51. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  52. Result Granted
  53. Comment Petition for Appt. of Guardian of the Person (Subsequent)
  54. Continued Hearing by Court
  55. Original Type Continued Hearing by Court
  56. Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane
  57. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  58. Result Dismissed
  59. Comment Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person (Initial)
  60. Appeared in Person
  61. Minute Order Attachment
  62. Comment A
  63. Minute Order Attachment
  64. Comment B
  65. Petition for Guardianship/Conservatorship Denied
  66. Order Appointing Guardian (Subsequent/Competing)
  67. Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more