Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-30
Type Money Judgment
Docket 34 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bairdjudith
Defendant Pricemikey Pricemike,
Photo of Hon. Stout Jacqueline

Judge

Hon. Stout Jacqueline

Craig County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SMALL CLAIMS AFFIDAVIT FILED UNDER $5000.00
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. ISSUE AFFIDAVIT & ORDER (CERTIFIED COPIES TO PLAINTIFF
  4. FOR SERVICE)
  5. AFFIDAVIT AS TO MILITARY SERVICE
  6. RETURN AFFIDAVIT & ORDER (SPECIAL AGENT SERVED)
  7. CM/DE (STOUT). PLAINTIFF PRESENT WITH ATTORNEY.
  8. DEFENDANT MICHAEL PRICE (SPA MIKEY PRICE/MIKE PRICE)
  9. PRESENT. PARTIES WENT TO MEDIATION AND WERE UNABLE TO
  10. REACH AN AGREEMENT. BOTH SWORN, TESTIMONY HEARD.
  11. COURT ALLOWS PLAINTIFF TO AMEND AFFIDAVIT TO ADD AN
  12. ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT OR TO HAVE HER PRESENT ON NEXT
  13. HEARING TO TESTIFY. BOTH PARTIES ARE ORDERED
  14. RECOGNIZED BACK ON 9-27-23 @ 9:30 AM.
  15. ISSUE SUBPOENA TO PLAINTIFF
  16. RETURN SUBPOENA (DANIEL HOLLAWAY SERVED SAMANTHA PROPST
  17. 9-25-23)
  18. CM/DE (STOUT) FILED 9-28-23. PLAINTIFF PRESENT
  19. WITHOUT HER ATTORNEY JOE ROBERT. DEFENDANT PRESENT.
  20. ATTORNEY MATTHEW DAY MAKES AN ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR
  21. DEFENDANT MIKEY PRICE. SAMANTHA PROPST PRESENT.
  22. ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR
  23. HEARING. CASE CONTINUED FOR HEARING 10-25-23 AT 9:30
  24. AM. BOTH PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT ARE ORDERED
  25. RECOGNIZED BACK ON THAT DATE. SAMANTHA PROPST IS ALSO
  26. ORDERED BACK ON 10-25-23. IF SHE IS NOT PRESENT AN
  27. ARREST WARRANT WILL BE ISSUED.
  28. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  29. CM/DE (STOUT). NO APPEARANCES. AT DEFENDANT'S REQUEST
  30. & WITH NO OBJECTION BY PLAINTIFF. CASE CONTINUED TO
  31. 12-6-23 @ 9:30 AM BY WRITTEN MOTION AND ORDER.
  32. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE
  33. CM/DE (STOUT). PLAINTIFF PRESENT WITH ATTORNEY JOE ROBERT. DEFENDANT PRESENT WITH ATTORNEY MATTHEW DAY. SAMANTHA PROPST PRESENT. ALL SWORN, TESTIMONY HEARD. COURT ORDERS JUDGMENT TO THE PLAINTIFF FOR $600.00. BUSINESS CHECK OF $600.00 PROVIDED BY ATTORNEY AND GIVEN TO PLAINTIFF.
  34. JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more