Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-29
Type Injuctive Relief
Docket 80 entries
Disposition SETTLE
Photo of Hon. Hogan, Mike

Judge

Hon. Hogan, Mike

McIntosh County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE AND ENTER PETITION
  2. OKLA. COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. F AND E ISSUING SUMMONS
  14. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE GOTCHER & BEAVER
  15. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE RUSSELL L. MULINIX
  16. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE LINDSEY MULINIX
  17. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND
  18. FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT.
  19. DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL APPEARANCE AND RESPONSE AND
  20. OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
  21. RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
  22. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. HEARING SET FOR 01-25-2022
  23. @9:00AM. S/HOGAN
  24. 11/30/21 CM COMES ON FOR: PLINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR
  25. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. RUSSELL MULINIX AND WARREN
  26. GOTCHER APPEAR ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS. ALAN
  27. BARDELL APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. ARGUMENT
  28. PRESENTED BY COUNSEL.
  29. RULING: PLINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
  30. RESTRAINING ORDER IS GRANTED PER ORDER FILED THIS DATE.
  31. CASE IS SET FOR RETURN HEARING JANUARY 25, 2022 AT 9AM.
  32. S/HOGAN
  33. MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
  34. NOTICE OF HEARING, SET FOR JANUARY 25, 2022 AT 9:00AM.
  35. OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
  36. AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION.
  37. DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF IT'S MOTION TO
  38. STAY PROCEEDINGS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION.
  39. DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
  40. TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION.
  41. MOTION TO SETTLE
  42. AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
  43. NOTICE OF FILING
  44. DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION AND RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S
  45. MOTION TO SETTLE.
  46. CM 4-13-22, COMES ON FOR: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SETTLE.
  47. WARREN GOTCHER APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF. ALAN
  48. BARDELL APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. ARGUMENT
  49. PRESENTED BY COUNSEL. RULING: THE ISSUE OF WHETHER
  50. THERE'S BEEN A WAIVER IS AN ISSUE FOR ARBITRATION
  51. PURSUANT TO 12 O.S. §1857 (C). PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO
  52. SETTLE IS STRICKEN AS MOOT BASED UPON THE COURT'S
  53. RULING THIS DATE. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL IS
  54. GRANTED. S/HOGAN
  55. ORDER S/HOGAN
  56. PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
  57. CERTFICATE OF SERVICE
  58. DESIGNATION OF RECORD FOR APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT
  59. PETITION IN ERROR
  60. DISTRICT COURT NO. CV-21-237
  61. SUPREME COURT NO.
  62. AMENDED DESIGNATION OF RECORD FOR APPEAL FROM DISTRICT
  63. COURT
  64. COUNTER DESIGNATION OF RECORD FOR APPEAL FROM DIST. CT.
  65. RESPONSE TO PETITION IN ERROR BY ALAN BARDELL/HAYES
  66. MAGRINI AND GATEWOOD
  67. NOTICE OF FILING AN ORIGINAL AND 2 COPIES OF TRANSCRIPT
  68. OF PROCEEDINGS HEARD ON THE 13TH APRIL 2022 W 1 COPY
  69. COPY WITHDRAWN BY COURT REPORTER KRISTY EVANS
  70. PETITION IN ERROR
  71. NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF RECORD ON APPEAL FROM DISTRICT
  72. COURT. MAILED TO CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT, AGS
  73. OFFICE, ATTYS: MULINIX, EDDY & EWERT ATTYS: WARREN
  74. GOTCHER AND ATTYS HAYES, MAGRINI & GATEWOOD
  75. INDEX
  76. APPELANTS' BRIEF IN CHIEF
  77. APPELLANT'S REPLY TO ANSWER BRIEF
  78. REQUEST FOR APPEAL
  79. APPEAL SENT TO APPEALANT COURT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.