Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-08
Status Dismissed
Type 31 Limited Commercial Under $10,000
Docket 143 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Singh, Ravdeep
Defendant Rodriguez, Arturo|View Document 8/24/2023 Dismissal Of Doe (s)|View Document 8/24/2023 Dismissal Of Doe (s)
Photo of Hon. Disqualified Alvarez, Brian F

Judge

Hon. Disqualified Alvarez, Brian F

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Law and Motion Minute Order was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Arturo Rodriguez
  2. View Document - Civil case cover sheet
  3. Unlawful Detainer Complaint filed
  4. View Document - Unlawful Detainer Complaint filed
  5. Unlawful Detainer Supplemental Cover Sheet
  54. Comment Notice of Objection to Have this Case Heard by a Judge Pro Temp or Commissioner
  55. Request Filed
  56. View Document - Request Filed
  57. Comment for Sua Sponte Dismissal for Lack of Plaintiff Standing
  58. Unlawful Detainer Court Trial
  59. Original Type Unlawful Detainer Court Trial
  60. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  61. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  62. Result Heard
  63. Appeared in Person
  64. Minute Order Attachment
  65. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  66. Proof of Service
  67. View Document Proof of Service- Notice of Appeal
  68. Comment Notice of Appeal
  69. Notice of Appeal filed
  70. View Document Notice of Appeal filed
  71. Comment Appealing date
  72. Notification of Filing Notice of Appeal filed
  73. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  74. View Document Clerk's Certificate of Mailing- Designation of Electronic Service
  75. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Designation of Electronic Service) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on ( ) . Parties served: ( Arturno Rodriguez & Ravdep Singh)
  76. Ex parte Filed
  77. View Document - Ex parte Filed
  78. Comment Ex Parte Request for Stay Pending Appeal
  79. Declaration Filed
  80. View Document - Declaration Filed
  81. Comment Appellant's Declaration in Support of Request for Stay Pending Appeal
  82. Points and Authorities filed
  83. View Document - Points and Authorities filed
  84. Comment Points and Authorities in Support of Request for Stay Pending Appeal
  85. Order Received for Signature
  86. View Document - Order Received for Signature
  87. Comment **Pending Hearing at 8:30am in Dept. 404**
  88. Writ of Possession Issued
  89. View Document - Writ of Possession Issued
  90. Proof of Service
  91. View Document Proof of Service
  92. Comment Notice of Appeal
  93. Ex Parte Hearing
  94. Original Type Ex Parte Hearing
  95. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  96. Hearing Time 8:29 AM
  97. Result Heard
  98. Comment for Stay Pending Appeal
  99. Minute Order Attachment
  100. View Document 09.27.23 Minute Order
  101. Appeared in Person
  102. Order Granted
  103. View Document 09.27.23 Order Granted Ex Parte for Stay
  104. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  105. Comment Stay pending appeal
  106. Appellants Notice Designating Record on Appeal filed
  107. Proof of Service
  108. View Document Proof of Service
  109. Comment Appellant's Notice Designating Record on Appeal
  110. Failure to Procure Record on Appeal filed
  111. View Document - Failure to Procure Record on Appeal filed
  112. Comment File AMENDED APP-103 and AMENDED APP-109
  113. General Motion
  114. Original Type General Motion
  115. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  116. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  117. Result Heard
  118. Comment Court's own motion to determine conditions of the stay
  119. Minute Order Attachment
  120. View Document 10.04.23 Minute Order
  121. Appeared in Person
  122. Judgment set aside
  123. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  124. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  125. View Document Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  126. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Notification of Filing Notice of Appeal) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: (Arturo Rodriguez)
  127. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  128. View Document Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  129. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Designation of Electronic Service) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on () . Parties served: (Arturo Rodriguez)
  130. Unlawful Detainer Dismissal
  131. Judicial Officer Whalen, Robert
  132. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  133. Cancel Reason Off Calendar
  134. Chambers Work- Pre
  135. Original Type Chambers Work- Pre
  136. Judicial Officer Alvarez, Brian
  137. Hearing Time 6:00 AM
  138. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  139. Order Received for Signature
  140. View Document Order Received for Signature
  141. Comment Forwarded to Dept: 50 Order for: Dismissal of Appeal
  142. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  143. View Document - Clerk's Certificate of Mailing

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more