Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Escambia County

Court

Escambia County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-28
Status CLOSED
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 58 entries
Disposition voluntary dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Dixon, Amanda
Defendant Hardy, Adrienne Blackledge | Hardy, Adrienne Blackledge | Hardy, Kevin | Hardy, Kevin | Herrick, Alexander | Herrick, Nathan
Photo of Hon. [ N Civil ] Williams, Thomas H

Judge

Hon. [ N Civil ] Williams, Thomas H

Escambia County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE CLOSED
  2. OTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
  3. RDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT'S NATHAN HERRICK AND ALEXANDER HERRICK ONLY - Recorded (OR.8783.1678 / 2022049250)
  4. RDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT'S NATHAN HERRICK AND ALEXANDER HERRICK ONLY
  5. OTICE OF FILING - UNSIGNED ORDER RETURNED TO FILER VIA E-MAIL TO BE FILED DIRECTLY WITH THE JUDGE
  6. OINT STIPULATION FROR DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANTS NATHAN HERRICK AND ALEXANDER HERRICK (ONLY)
  7. NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANTS ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE HARDY AND KEVIN HARDY
  8. EFENDANT KEVIN HARDY'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
  9. EFENDANT ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
  10. OTICE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE AND KEVIN HARDY'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  11. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANTKEVIN HARDY
  12. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANT, ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE HARDY
  13. LAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS NATHAN HERRICK AND ALEXANDER HERRICKS' RERQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  14. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF’S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT HERRICKS’ FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  15. LAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT NATHAN HERRICK
  16. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, NATHAN HERRICK
  17. LAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT KEVIN HARDY
  18. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, KEVIN HARDY
  19. LAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DENDANT ALEXANDER HERRICK
  20. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, ALEXANDER HERRICK
  21. LAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO DEFENDANT ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE HARDY
  22. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT, ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE HARDY
  23. NITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - GENERAL
  24. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS, NATHAN HERRICK AND ALEXANDER HERRICKS’ REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
  25. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON
  26. EFENDANT HERRICKS' FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO THE PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON
  27. EFENDANT HERRICKS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON
  28. OTICE OF FILING
  29. EFENDANTS HERRICK'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 2.516(B)(1) AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES
  30. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FINAL SERVICE AND COMPLIANCE WITH AMENDED ORDER TO PLAINTIFF REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  31. NSWER OF DEFENDANTS NATHAN HERRICK AND ALEXANDER HERRICK
  32. LAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT KEVIN HARDY'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  33. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF, AMANDA DIXON’S, ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT, KEVIN HARDY’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  34. DEFENDANTS KEVIN HARDY AND ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE’S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT
  35. TIPULATED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
  36. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT KEVIN HARDY’S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS
  37. EFENDANT'S ATTORNEY: MILLER, DOUGLAS GRAYSON ASSIGNED
  38. EFENDANT KEVIN HARDY'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON
  39. EFENDANT KEVIN HARDY'S FIRST REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON
  40. OTIEC OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT KEVIN HARDY'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF AMANDA DIXON
  41. EFENDANTS KEVIN HARDY AND ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF AMANADA DIXON'S COMPLAINT
  42. EFENDANTS ADRIENNE BLACKLEDGE AND KEVIN HARDY'S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES
  43. RDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  44. UMMONS ISSUED
  45. UMMONS ISSUED
  46. UMMONS ISSUED
  47. UMMONS ISSUED
  48. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  49. AYMENT $440.00 RECEIPT #2021085593
  50. LAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: BOLTON, STEPHEN F ASSIGNED
  51. OBLES, LINDA L.: ASSIGNED
  52. ROPOSED SUMMONS
  53. ROPOSED SUMMONS
  54. ROPOSED SUMMONS
  55. ROPOSED SUMMONS
  56. IVIL COVER SHEET
  57. OMPLAINT
  58. IVIL COVER SHEET

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more