Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-28
Status 09/07/2023 Conference
Type 10 Cv Construction Defect Civil Unlimited
Docket 52 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Loveall, Theresa | Jaime, Johnny | Colvin, Linda | Loveall, Randy, Ii | Fisher, Johanna | Heredia, Enrique
Defendant Willer, Jeremy | Jeremy Willer Construction, Inc., A California Corporation

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Summons- does not conform to Complaint; incorrect address of Civil Court
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 07/18/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: 17
  3. Served 05/26/2022 Served 05/26/2022 Served 02/11/202310:00 AM
  4. Comment Issued and Filed
  5. Comment BCV-18-100007
  6. Comment as to Jeremy Willer, via mail service
  7. Comment as to Jeremy Willer Construction, Inc., a California corporation, via mail service
  8. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Notice of Assignment to Judge and Notice of Case Management Conference
  9. Comment of Assignment to Judge and Notice of Case Management Conference
  10. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment To: William L. Alexander, Esq. For: Certificate of Inability to Respond Reason: First appearance fees are due for defendants, please resubmit with $435.00 attached for each defendant. The total should be $870.00, please review.
  11. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Comment I represent Defendants, JEREMY WILLER CONSTRUCTION, INC and JEREMY WILLER ("Defendants"). Defendants are compiling the documents to evaluate whether there is a binding arbitration agreement as to one or all of the plaintiffs, and, if so, whether to enforce or waive the same. Defendants request an additional 30 days to file a responsive pleading. There have been no prior extensions granted by this court. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall have until July 25, 2022, or __________________________ to file a responsive pleading.
  12. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  13. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Comment IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall have until 8/24/2022 to file a responsive pleading.
  14. Comment ***PAID*** Answer to Complaint Filed 8/26/2022; $1000 Complex Case Fee
  15. Comment ***PAID*** Answer to Complaint Filed 8/26/2022; $1000 Complex Case Fee
  16. Comment Summons - Cross Complaint
  17. Comment re:Cross Complaint
  18. Comment Notice
  19. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held
  20. Comment Plaintiffs' Certificate of Merit [CCP 411.35]
  21. Comment for Plaintiffs, Theresa Loveall, Randy Loveall III, Johnny Jaime, Enrique Heredia, Johanna Fisher & Linda Colvin
  22. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT: Amendment to Complaint & Proposed Order need to be filed in the same PDF document as one.
  23. Comment DOE 1: WADDELL & ASSOCIATES, INC., a California corporation,
  24. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment The proposed Amendment for DOE 1 was previously submitted on 12/5/22 and its currently pending review and signature from Judge.
  25. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Continued - Party's Motion Hearing Comment continued from 10/03/2022
  26. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 03:00 PM Result Ruling
  27. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Substitutions of Attorney. Reason: I am sending these back per my conversation with Erica Evans at the law firm.
  28. Comment for Plaintiffs attorney
  29. Comment for all Plaintiffs
  30. Comment as to Waddel & Associates, Inc., a California corporation (Doe 1), via Sub-service
  31. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held Comment CONT 01/06/23
  32. Comment Service Address
  33. Comment Regarding Plaintiffs' Amendment to Complaint
  34. Comment Plaintiffs' Status Conference Statement
  35. Comment Plaintiffs' Amended Certificate of Merit [CCP 411.35]
  36. Comment Proof of Electronic Service
  37. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held Comment continued from 03/09/2023
  38. Comment DOE 501: WADDELL & ASSOCIATES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
  39. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Request for Dismissal of WADDELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Reason: 1.) The court information at the top of the form is incorrect. Please review. 2.) The defendant named in item 1(b)6 must conform to the complaint; missing "a California Corporation".
  40. Comment as to Defendant Waddell & Associates, Inc., a California corporation, only.
  41. Comment Notice of Ruling Re: Continuance of Case Management Conference
  42. Comment Notice of Ruling on Amendment to Complaint
  43. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Comment continued from 06/08/2023

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase