Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-05-13
Status Pending
Type 36 Cv Wrongful Termination Civil Unlimited
Docket 75 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ryall, Susan
Defendant Transamerica Medical Group, A California Corporation|Cross ryall , Susan|Cross garcia, Chase
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 5/30/2023 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: 17
  2. Served 04/07/20237:33 PM
  3. Comment as to Transamerica Medical Group, a California Corporation dba Tulare Urgent Care, via Personal service
  4. Comment Request for Extension of time in which to file their responsive pleading
  5. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Comment Extension Granted; Responsive pleading to be filed not later than 6/12/2023
  6. Comment Former Attorney: Lebeau Thelen LLP; New Attroney: Andeep K Grwal Dhindsa
  7. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  8. Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Ruling
  9. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Continued from 8/14/2023
  13. View Document Further Case Management Conference 12/01/2023 Judicial Officer Pulskamp, Gregory Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 08/29/23
  14. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Review Cal. Code Civ. Proc. 428.50.
  15. Original Type Further Case Management Conference View Document Further Case Management Conference 12/12/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 08/29/23
  16. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Motion for leave: Please contact the clerks office to reserve a Motion date. The date selected is a Court holiday.
  17. Comment Transamerica Medical Group Motion for leave to file Cross-Complaint
  18. View Document Motion for Leave 01/23/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 12/18/23 Transamerica Medical Group Motion for leave to file Cross-Complaint
  19. View Document Ruling 02/15/2024 Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Ruling Comment Continued Case Management Conference
  20. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Case management statement. Reason: On 2/15/2024, the court on it's own motion continued the case management conference from 3/8/2024 to 3/29/2024 at 8:30 a.m. in department Traffic Courtroom 2.
  21. Comment Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint
  22. View Document Further Case Management Conference 03/29/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 09/18/23, 12/01/23, 12/12/23, 3/8/2024
  23. Comment Notice of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to file Cross-Complaint
  24. Comment Return to Sender. Not Delivered as Addressed. Unable to Forward.
  25. Comment Change of Address for Andeep K Grewal of Grewal Law Firm as follows: 2200 19th Street Bakersfield CA 93301
  26. Comment MINUTE ORDER 03/29/2024.*UNABLE TO FORWARD*
  27. View Document Motion for Leave / Further Case Management Conference 04/18/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 3/14/24 Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint
  28. View Document Motion for Leave / Further Case Management Conference 04/18/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 09/18/23, 12/01/23, 12/12/23, 3/8/2024,03/28/2024
  29. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Please utilize revised form date January 1, 2024. Court address listed is incorrect. Branch name is incorrect.
  30. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Review CRC 3.110. No proof of service is attached. Civil case cover sheet is not needed with cross complaint submission
  31. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Please re-file only the Cross-Complaint in Pleading as Cross-Complaint on forms PLD-C-001 is incorrect form and format.
  32. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 05/13/2024
  33. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- Caption as to complaint filed 02/14/2023 does not conform exact to complaint. Review verbiage as to all parties including the " does". Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint. Page 2 is blank. Proof of service is missing. Review/Correct and re-submit.
  34. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment All cross actions are not listed. Review CRC 2.111. Signature missing.
  35. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- Incorrect county listed. Verbiage in caption as to "Cross-defendants" is missing.
  36. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Missing Proof of Service.
  37. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  38. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment 1. Please remove "cross defendant" verbiage on #3a. 2. Two methods of service selected. Please choose one and complete the section accordingly. 3. Header on page 2 is incomplete. Please review and revise accordingly.
  39. Comment and Cross-Complaint as to Susan Ryall, an individual via electronic service
  40. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Case management statement. Reason: Must use mandatory judicial council form CM -110 revised 1/1/2024 Form CM-110 revised 9/1/2021 is outdated.
  41. View Document Further Case Management Conference 07/02/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 09/18/23, 12/01/23, 12/12/23, 03/08/24, 03/28/24, 04/18/24
  42. Comment 9/11/2024 8:30 a.m. T-2
  43. Comment of Christine M Adams re Notice of Order to Appear
  44. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Cont'd from 09/18/23, 12/01/23, 12/12/23, 03/08/24, 03/28/24, 04/18/24, 07/03/24
  45. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment directed to Christine M Adams, plaintiff's counsel, for failing to appear at the Case Management Conference on 07/02/2024 and failure to comply with California Rules of Court, Rules 3.720 - 3.730.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more