Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-07
Status INACTIVE
Type Workmans Comp. Adm. Appeal
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Santina R. Curry
Defendant Cuyahoga County|Bureau Of Workers' Compensation John Logue, Administrator
Photo of Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Judge

Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53703317) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: COREY KUZMA [email protected]
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53703316) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: SARAH E THOMAS [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(53703315) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: MICHAEL J STEWART [email protected]
  5. DISMISSAL ENTRY SIGNED AND ATTACHED. OSJ. FINAL. IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. STIPULATION FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY SARAH E THOMAS 0088064 DISMISSAL ENTRY
  7. MEDIATION HEARING HELD. THE PARTIES IN THE CAPTIONED CASE HAVE REACHED A SETTLEMENT AND AGREE TO SUBMIT THE DISMISSAL ENTRY WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. MEDIATION SET FOR 03/25/2024 AT 01:00 PM. (Notice Sent).
  9. TRIAL BY JURY SET FOR 06/24/2024 AT 10:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  10. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 05/23/2024 AT 10:00 AM. (Notice Sent).
  11. CASE REFERRED TO WORKERS' COMPENSATION MEDIATOR ON 10/25/2023. MEDIATION TO TAKE PLACE AFTER 01/29/24 AND BEFORE 03/29/24. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 10/25/23. ALL PARTIES WERE PRESENT. THE FOLLOWING DATES ARE TO APPLY TO THIS MATTER: ALL DISCOVERY TO BE COMPLETED BY 02/22/24. AFFIRMATIVE EXPERT REPORT DUE BY 02/22/24. REBUTTAL EXPERT REPORT DUE BY 03/22/24. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS DUE BY 03/29/24. RESPONSES AND REPLIES DUE BY RULE. FINAL PRETRIAL SET FOR 05/23/24 AT 10:00AM. FINAL PRETRIAL STATEMENTS DUE 7 DAYS PRIOR AND SHOULD BE E-MAILED TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY. ALL PARTIES, INCLUDING PARTIES WITH ULTIMATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY, ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT, IN PERSON. TELEPHONE APPEARANCE IS NOT PERMITTED FOR ANY REASON. TRIAL SET FOR 06/24/24 AT 10:00 AM. AN AGREED UPON SET OF JURY INSTRUCTIONS, INTERROGATORIES, VERDICT FORMS, AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE TO BE READ TO PROSPECTIVE JURORS ARE DUE 7 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. ANY INSTRUCTIONS THAT THE PARTIES CANNOT AGREE UPON SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY. COPIES SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN MICROSOFT WORD FORMAT BY EMAIL TO THE STAFF ATTORNEY. TRIAL BRIEFS, WITNESS LISTS, AND EXHIBIT LISTS ARE DUE 7 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. EXHIBITS SHALL BE LABELED AND MARKED BEFORE TRIAL. COURTESY COPIES OF EXHIBITS TO BE GIVEN TO THE COURT ON THE DAY OF TRIAL. EACH PARTY SHALL INCLUDE AS ONE OF THEIR EXHIBITS THE CURRICULUM VITAE OF ANY EXPERT(S) THAT MAY BE CALLED TO PRESENT EVIDENCE OR TESTIMONY AT TRIAL FOR THE USE OF COURT. ANY PARTY WISHING TO PROFFER DEPOSITION TESTIMONY (VIDEOTAPE AND WRITTEN) AT TRIAL SHALL FILE A LIST OF ALL DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS THAT ARE TO BE UTILIZED AT TRIAL AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. OBJECTIONS TO TESTIMONIAL DEPOSITIONS THAT REQUIRE RULINGS FROM THE COURT SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. COUNSEL PROPOSING TO USE SAID DEPOSITION SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO THE OBJECTIONS OR INDICATE THEIR AGREEMENT TO DELETE THE PORTION OF THE DEPOSITION FOR WHICH THERE IS AN OBJECTION THREE (3) DAYS BEFORE TRIAL. THE COURT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A COMPLETE WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT OF THE DISPUTED DEPOSITIONS. FAILURE OF ANY PARTY TO SUBMIT OBJECTIONS SHALL RESULT IN WAIVER OF ALL OBJECTIONS. MOTIONS IN LIMINE MUST BE FILED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. ANY BRIEFS IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS IN LIMINE ARE DUE 7 DAYS PRIOR TO TRIAL. REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE BY LEAVE OF COURT ONLY. UNTIMELY MOTIONS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED OR ACCEPTED. ALL PARTIES ARE TO NOTE THAT A PERSON WITH ULTIMATE SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY MUST BE PRESENT, IN PERSON, FOR ALL SET DATES. NO EXCEPTIONS AND NO TELEPHONE APPEARANCE PERMITTED FOR ANY REASON. FAILURE TO APPEAR AT ANY SET DATE WILL RESULT IN JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED OR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 41(B) AS WELL AS POSSIBLE SANCTIONS. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. CMC BY PHONE SET FOR 10/25/2023 AT 09:30 AM ALL PARTIES ARE TO CALL THE CONFERENCE CALL NUMBER 1-720-708-1090 AND ENTER ACCESS CODE 7235579# AT THE SCHEDULED DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILL RESULT IN A CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE BEING SET WITHOUT THEIR INPUT AND MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. DISCOVERY IS TO START IMMEDIATELY. PARTIES TO BE READY WITH DEMAND AND OFFER OF SETTLEMENT. NOTICE ISSUED. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. ANSWER FILED BY D2 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION ATTORNEY SARAH E THOMAS 0088064 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT ADMINISTRATOR, BWC
  15. USPS RECEIPT NO. 51309795 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/18/2023 BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROCESSED BY COC 08/23/2023.
  16. USPS RECEIPT NO. 51309794 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/09/2023 CUYAHOGA COUNTY PROCESSED BY COC 08/16/2023.
  17. ANSWER FILED BY D1 CUYAHOGA COUNTY ATTORNEY MICHAEL J STEWART 0082257 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT CUYAHOGA COUNTY
  18. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(51309795) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION WILLIAM GREEN BUILDING 30 WEST SPRING STREET COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  19. COMPLAINT W/ NO SUMS(51309794) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: CUYAHOGA COUNTY 2079 EAST 9TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44115
  20. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. JUDGE DEBORAH M TURNER ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD
  23. JUDGE DEBORAH M TURNER ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  24. LEGAL RESEARCH
  25. LEGAL NEWS
  26. LEGAL AID
  27. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  28. COMPUTER FEE
  29. CLERK'S FEE
  30. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID COREY KUZMA

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more