Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-18
Status Pending
Type 10 Cv Construction Defect Civil Unlimited
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Chaidez, Araceli|Martinez, Jennifer|Nicolas & Leonora Casimiro|Marta & Maria Duran|Lepe, Simon|Wilifer Medina & Oralia Cervantes|Zavala, Paulo
Defendant Rancho Del Sol Partners, Llc|Whitney Oak, Llc|Leora, Llc
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment SUMMONS: Summons does not conform exactly to Complaint. Please review Party information.
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 03/20/2023 Hearing Time: 8:30AM Hearing Department/Division: H
  3. Served 02/14/20232:11 PM Served 02/14/20232:11 PM Served 02/14/20232:11 PM
  4. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment SUMMONS: ***SECOND REJECTION*** Party names do not conform EXACTLY to Complaint. Some names on Summons are FIRST LAST & FIRST LAST while on Complaint they are listed as FIRST & FIRST LAST
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment SUMMONS: ***THIRD REJECTION*** Party names do not conform EXACTLY to Complaint. Some names on Summons are FIRST LAST & FIRST LAST while on Complaint they are listed as FIRST & FIRST LAST. Please compare every name listed on Summons to Complaint.
  6. Comment as to Leora, LLC, via Sub-service
  7. Comment as to Rancho Del Sol Partners, LLC, via Sub-service
  8. Comment as to Whitney Oak, LLC, via Sub-service
  9. Comment of Anneke Blye RE: Order to Show Cause RE: Service
  10. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  11. Comment without prejudice as to the Plaintiffs listed
  12. Comment as to the Plaintiffs listed
  13. Comment Without Prejudice of Plaintiff, Paulo Zavala (362 Obsidian Ct)
  14. Comment Without Prejudice of Plaintiffs Ramanpreet Singh, Humberto Ochoa and Rachel Guerrero ONLY
  15. Hearing Time 03:30 PM Result Ruling
  16. Comment Without Prejudice as to Rachma Natangcop Only
  17. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  18. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Cont'd from 07/07/23
  22. View Document Order to Show Cause / Further Case Management Conference 03/19/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment re: Sanctions directed to Plaintiff's counsel to show cause why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions in the amount of $250.00 pursuant to CRC Rule 2.30(c) for FTA at the CMC on 03/19/24 and FTC with CRC, Rules 3.720 - 3.730.
  23. Comment Re: Imposition of Monetary Sanctions ($500.00 - Failiure to Appear Hearing Date: 6/20/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  24. Comment Re: Why matter should not be Dismissed Hearing Date: 6/20/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m. Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  25. View Document Further Case Management Conference 06/20/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  26. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment re: Sanctions directed to Plaintiff's counsel to show cause why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions $500.00 pursuant to CRC Rule 2.30(c) for FTA at the CMC on 03/19/2024 and FTC with CRC, Rules 3.720 - 3.730.
  27. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment of the Complaint pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rules of Court, Rules 3.720 - 3.730. Case appears to be abandoned.
  28. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark
  29. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Cont'd from 06/18/24
  30. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment of the Complaint for FTC with CRC, Rules 3.720 - 730. Case appears to be abandoned. Cont'd from 06/20/24

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more