Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 12/29/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30AM Hearing Department/Division:J
- Served 09/23/20223:31 PM Served 09/23/20223:31 PM Served 09/23/20223:31 PM Served 09/23/20223:31 PM Served 09/23/20223:31 PM
- Comment as to Scelzi Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, via sub service
- Comment as to Scelzi Management Co., a California corporation, via sub service
- Comment as to Scelzi Holding Co., a California corporation, via sub service
- Comment Proof of Service of Summons/Complaint (Proof of Service)
- Comment as to Scelzi Brothers, LLC, a California limited liability company, via sub service
- Comment Scelzi Management Co.'s Answer to Complaint
- Comment Defendant Scelzi Enterprises, Inc.'s Answer to Complaint
- Comment Defendant Scelzi Equipment, Inc.'s Answer to Complaint
- Comment Defendant Scelzi Brothers, LLC's Answer to Complaint
- Comment Defendant Scelzi Holding Co's Answer to Complaint
- Comment ***PAID*** Answer to Complaint Filed 10/24/2022; $1000 Complex Case Fee
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Notice of Deposit of Additional Fee for Complex Case Designation Envelope Id# 10321787 Each named defendant you are representing has a filing fee due of $1025.00 (complex fees and administrative fee x5). Please contact the department directly (661-868-7204) to make individual credit card payments for each named defendant as this system will not allow the $25 administrative fees to be processed. Please note that with each credit card transaction taken that a 1.99% processing fee will be applied. If you prefer, five separate checks can be submitted with a copy of Notice of Insufficient Fees.
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
- Comment No Proof of Service filed
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re Case Management Statement Version of CM-110 filed is outdated, please use updated version dated 9/1/2021
- View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
- Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint
- Comment Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class Claims
- Comment Memorandum of Points & Authorities ISO Motion Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class Claims
- Comment Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class Claims
- Comment Declaration of Erica Rodriguez ISO Motion Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class Claims
- Comment Declaration of Sanchez ISO Motion Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class Claims
- Comment Proof of Service re: Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class
- Comment PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS CLASS CLAIMS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF IN SUPPORT THEREOF
- Comment PLAINTIFFS EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
- Comment DECLARATION OF DIEGO AVILES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS CLASS CLAIMS
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Declaration of Jesus Ismael Garica; Does not conform to CRC 2.100-2.119. Please include a cover page
- Comment DECLARATION OF JESUS ISMAEL GARCIA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS CLASS CLAIMS
- Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment cont'd from 03/14/23
- Comment Reply ISO Motion Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Claims
- Comment Declaration of Sonia Valenzuela ISO Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class Claims
- Comment Response to Objections to Evidence Submitted in support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration
- Comment Reply ISO Motion Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Claims
- Comment Declaration of Sonia Valenzuela ISO Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class Claims
- Comment Response to Objections to Evidence Submitted in Support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration
- View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 4/21/2023 Defendants Motion to Comple Arbitration
- Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment cont'd from 03/14/23, 05/15/23
- Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Ruling Comment Statement of Decision Re Deft's Motion to Compel Arbitration
- Comment Proposed Order Cover Sheet
- Comment of Submission of Proposed Order
- Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment on Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Class Claims Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff Jesus Garcia's class claims alleged in the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Plaintiff Jesus Garcia is ordered to submit his claims alleged in the above-captioned action, on an individual basis, to binding arbitration. 3. The above-captioned action is stayed pending arbitration of Plaintiff Jesus Garcia's claims. 4. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. 5. Plaintiff Jesus Garcia's Evidentiary Objections to Evidence Submitted in Support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration No. 1 and 3-4 are OVERRULED. 6. Plaintiff Jesus Garcia's Evidentiary Objection to Evidence Submitted in Support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration No. 2 is SUSTAINED. 7. A Status Conference Regarding Arbitration is hereby set for February 23, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Division J of the above-entitled Court. IT IS SO ORDERED.
- Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Set from 05/23/23- re status of arbitration (Deft's motion to compel arbitration was granted)
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In