Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-28
Status Dismissed
Type 07 Cv Business Tort Civil Unlimited
Docket 58 entries
Disposition without prejudice

Parties

Plaintiff Mediacom California, Llc
Defendant Race Telecommunications, Llc | Racetv, Llc
Photo of Hon. Zulfa David

Judge

Hon. Zulfa David

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment SUMMONS: Summons does not conform exactly to Complaint. Please review Party information (including DOES information). Summons section, 'Notice To The Person Served', must be left blank/un-selected when initially filing. Please correct and re-file into the existing case. Attorney address does not conform exactly to complaint
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 02/17/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  3. Served 11/15/202212:50 PM Served 11/15/202212:50 PM
  4. Comment Letter informing of Ex Parte Hearing set for 11/29/22 at 8:30 am in Division J.
  5. Comment Plaintiff Mediacom California LLC Amended Notice of Ex Parte Application and Ex Parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order and Order To Show Cause : Preliminary Injunction
  6. Comment Plaintiff Mediacom California LLC s Ex Parte Application for temporary restraining order and order to show cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
  7. Comment of Martin L Fineman Regarding Notice of Ex Parte Hearing on Application for TRO and OSC RE: Preliminary Injunction
  8. Comment Marla Bowen ISO Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order an Order to Show Cause RE: Preliminary Injunction
  9. Comment of Matthew Anthony Sobieski ISO Ex Parte App for Temp. Restraining Order and Order to show cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
  10. Comment Letter to Race Telecommunications, Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application/Petition, Plaintiffs Notice of Ex Parte Application Memo of Points Declarations of Marla Bowen and Matthew Anthony, Proposed Order for Temp Restraining Order
  11. Comment as to Race Telecommunications, LLC, via sub service
  12. Comment as to Racetv, LLC, via sub service
  13. Comment OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS RACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND RACETV, LLC TO EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Oppositions)
  14. Comment EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS RACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND RACETV, LLC TO DECLARATION OF MARLA BOWEN (Objections)
  15. Comment EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS RACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND RACETV, LLC TO DECLARATION OF MATTHEW ANTHONY SOBIESKI (Objections)
  16. Comment DECLARATION OF RAUL ALCARAZ IN OPPOSITION TO EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Declarations)
  17. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Draft Incomplete Comment Filed 11/18/22 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Restraining Order to show cause Preliminary Injunction
  18. Comment of Plaintiff's Counsel
  19. Comment Plaintiff Mediacom California, LLC's objections
  20. Comment Reply memorandum
  21. Comment Response to Evidentiary objections to Declaration of Marla Bowen
  22. Comment Response to evidentiary objections to declaration of Matthew Sobrieski
  23. Comment Declaration of Jenna Comizio
  24. Comment Supplemental Declaration of Maria Bowen
  25. Comment Supplemental Declaration Martin Fineman
  26. Comment Supplemental Declaration of Matthew Sobieski
  27. Comment Proof of Service
  28. Comment SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Oppositions)
  29. Comment DEFENDANT RACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND RACETV, LLCS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF RAUL ALCARAZ
  30. Comment EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS RACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND RACETV, LLC TO DECLARATION OF JENNA COMIZIO GUARINO
  31. Comment EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS RACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND RACETV, LLC TO SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MARLA BOWEN (Objections)
  32. Comment EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS RACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND RACETV, LLC TO SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MARTIN L. FINEMAN (Objections)
  33. Comment EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANTS RACE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND RACETV, LLC TO SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MATTHEW ANTHONY SOBIESKI
  34. Comment SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF RAUL ALCARAZ IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA, LLCS APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  35. Comment DECLARATION OF RANDY WALTON IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA, LLCS APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Declarations)
  36. Comment DECLARATION OF VALENTINE ALVAREZ IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA, LLCS APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY
  37. Comment OF LEE FRISCH IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA, LLCS APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  38. Comment DECLARATION OF STEVEN BETTS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA, LLCS APP. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  39. Comment OF TIMOTHY RANDOLPH IN FURTHER OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF MEDIACOM CALIFORNIA, LLCS APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Declarations)
  40. Comment Hrg 12/28/22 Plaintiff Objection to and Motion to Strike Defendants Race Telecommunications, LLC and RaceTV, LLC's Reply Brief in Opposition to Mediacom's Application for Preliminary Injunction
  41. Comment of Rachelle Chong in Further Opposition to Plaintiff Mediacom California, LLC's Application for Preliminary Injunction
  42. Comment DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO AND MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION (Responses)
  43. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Re: Preliminary Injuction
  44. Comment to Extend Time for Defendants Race Telecommunications, LLC and Racetv, LLC to File Responsive Pleading
  45. Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Ruling
  46. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment Granting Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants Race Telecommunications, LLC and RaceTV, LLC to File Responsive Pleading GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants Race Telecommunications, LLC and RaceTV, LLC to File Responsive Pleading submitted by the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders that Defendants' deadline to file a responsive pleading to Mediacom California, LLC's Complaint is January 31, 2023.
  47. Comment Proposed Order Cover Sheet
  48. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Denying Plaintiff Mediacom California, LLC's Application for Preliminary Injunction NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, having considered the parties written submissions in support of and in opposition to the Application, in addition to the arguments of counsel at the hearing, the Application is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  49. Comment of Order Denying Plaintiff MEDIACOM California, LLC's Application for Preliminary Injunction
  50. Comment RE: Request for Refund
  51. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  52. Comment Without Prejudice
  53. Comment as to the Request for Dismissal
  54. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Dismissal Filed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more