Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-24
Status Dismissed
Type 45 Cv Medical Malpractice Civil Unlimited
Docket 15 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Vera, Christian
Defendant Modi, Meril S., Doctor Of Dental Sur
Photo of Hon. Bradshaw, J. Eric

Judge

Hon. Bradshaw, J. Eric

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Returned via USPS
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 09/14/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  3. Unserved
  4. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  5. Comment Notice of Order to Appear TO: JOHN R. CONTOS YOU ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR in the above entitled court to give any legal reason why the Special Rules for Administration of Civil Litigation could not be met. All appearances are mandatory, unless dismissal of the entire action is filed five (5) court days prior to the hearing. If this is a notice for failure to file a dismissal of the entire action as ordered by the Court, payment of sanctions must be paid at the time the Request for Dismissal is submitted. If there is any conflict of time, written requests only, showing just cause for change of the hearing date are required ten (10) court days prior to the hearing. If parties are in compliance and sanctions of $250.00 are paid five (5) court days prior to the hearing, then no appearance is necessary. If this is a second time, sanctions of $250.00 are required to be paid. This will also serve as notice that sanctions pursuant to CCP 177.5 and 575.2 will be before the court and ruled upon at that time. The hearing is set for October 27, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. in Department/Division J as a result of for failing to appear at Order to Show Cause re: California Rules of Court, Rule 3.110 scheduled for September 14, 2022 and pursuant to CCP 575.2.
  6. Comment Notice of Order to Appear and Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY OF RECORD, JOHN R. CONTOS: You and each of you, are ordered to appear before the court on October 27, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. in Division J, then and there to show cause, if any you have, why sanctions in the amount of $250.00 should not be imposed for your failure to comply with the Special Rules for Administration of Civil Litigation and more specifically: for failing to appear at the Order to Show Cause re: California Rules of Court, Rule 3.110 on September 14, 2022 and pursuant to CCP 575.2.
  7. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment To: John Contos Re: Request for Dismissal Reason: Please resubmit Request for Dismissal after the fees owed to the Court have been paid in the amount of $435.00. Please call the Clerks office at (661)_ 868-7204 if you have any questions.
  8. Comment With Prejudice as to Entire Action
  9. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Dismissal Filed Comment Cont'd from 09/14/22
  10. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Dismissal Filed Comment Directed to PL counsel John R Contos for FTA 09/14/22 hrg
  11. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Dismissal Filed Comment Re: Imp of sanc of $250 directed to PL counsel John R Contos for FTA 09/14/22 hrg.
  12. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Dismissal Filed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more