Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-04
Status Pending
Type 15 Cv Other Employment Civil Unlimited
Docket 38 entries
Disposition SETTLEMENT

Parties

Plaintiff Donna Herrera, An Individual, On Behalf Of Herself And All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant Olam America, Inc.
Photo of Hon. Zulfa David

Judge

Hon. Zulfa David

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 11/28/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  2. Unserved
  3. Comment Amended Complaint - Amount Unchanged (No Fee) (Amendments)
  4. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re. Proof of Service Reason: PARTY SERVED MUST CONFORM EXACT TO COMPLAINT. PLEASE CORRECT AND RESUBMIT.
  6. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service/Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt
  7. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re Case Management Statement Version of CM-110 filed is outdated please file correct version dated 9/1/2021
  8. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  9. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment cont'd from 11/28/22
  10. Comment Plaintiff's Notice of motion and Motion to Compel Further Responses and Actual Production of Documents; Request for Monetary Sanctions; Separate Statement in Support; Declaration of Brian D. Hefelfinger; and (Proposed) order
  11. Comment Plaintiff's Separate Statement in support of Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses and Request for Sanctions
  12. Comment Declaration of Brian D. Hefelfinger in support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and Seeking Sanctions
  13. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 02/06/24
  14. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re: Notice of Related Cases, please remove blank pages, Judicial Form is only 3 pages. Please note: as of 01/03/2023 case has been assigned to Judge David Zulfa, please see News Release posted on our website 12/16/2022 Changes to Judicial Assignment.
  15. Comment U.S. District Court, Eastern District Fresno, Ca Case No. 1:18-cv-01676NONE-SAB, Santa Clara County Case No. 21cv387028 and 21cv391812
  16. Comment DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION (SET TWO) AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF
  17. Comment DEFENDANT OLAM AMERICAS, INC.S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
  18. Comment DECLARATION OF JADE BUTMAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT OLAM AMERICAS, INC.S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES AND ACTUAL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
  19. Comment Proof of Service re: Opposition and Reply
  20. Comment Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Further Responses and Actual Production of Documents
  21. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 5/3/2023 PL Motion to compel further responses and Actual Production of Documents
  22. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Pre-Cleared Reservation Expired Comment Defendant's Demurrer- Reserved 5/25/2023 due 5/31/2023- Patricia 415 577 6212
  23. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 5/3/2023, cont'd from 06/12/23 PL Motion to compel further responses and Actual Production of Documents
  24. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Pre-Cleared Reservation Expired Comment 6/15/23 reservation expires 6/21/23 Defendant: OLAM AMERICAS, INC Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the Alternarive Motion to Stay
  25. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Production of Documents Having considered Plaintiff's motion, as well as the opposition papers, reply papers, and after receiving oral argument from counsel, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion and Request is GRANTED IN PART as follows. 1. Defendant OLAM AMERICAS, INC. is ordered to serve verified responses to Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories (Set One), Plaintiff's Form Interrogatories-Employment Law (Set One), and Plaintiff's Requests for Production (Set One) by no later than August 17, 2023. 2. In addition, all responsive documents (to Plaintiff's Requests for Production, Set One) shall be provided by Defendant to Plaintiff's counsel, by no later than August 17, 2023. The verified responses to Plaintiff's Requests for Production (Set One) must also indicate which responsive documents are responsive to the particular requests. (See, e.g., Cal. Civ. Proc. Code 2031.280(a).) 3. The Parties' respective requests for sanctions are denied without prejudice. In the event future compliance with this Order does not occur, the Request for Sanctions may be re-filed. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  26. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Cont'd from 02/06/23, 05/10/23
  27. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Motion for for Class Action Certification Set from 05/10/23 hearing
  28. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 10:00 AM Comment JT: 08/05/24 0930 DIV J T/E: 5 DAYS JURY FOR PLAINTIFF
  29. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 01:30 PM Comment JT: 08/05/24 0930 DIV J T/E: 5 DAYS JURY FOR PLAINTIFF
  30. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 09:30 AM Comment T/E: 5 DAYS JURY FOR PLAINTIFF

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase