Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-01
Status Appeal
Type 15 Cv Other Employment Civil Unlimited
Docket 57 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Priscilla Herrera Individually And On Behalf Of Other Members Of The General Public Similarly Situated
Defendant Centre For Neuro Skills, A California Corporation | Cfn Services, Inc., A California Corporation | Cfn Services, Inc. California, An Unknown Business Entity
Photo of Hon. Zulfa David

Judge

Hon. Zulfa David

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 11/17/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  2. Served 09/07/2022 Served 09/07/2022 Served 09/07/2022
  3. Comment Amended Complaint - Amount Unchanged (No Fee) (Amendments)
  4. Comment First Amended Summons (Summons)
  5. Comment as to Centre for Neuro Skills, a California corporation, via mail
  6. Comment as to CFN Services, Inc., a California corporation, via mail service
  7. Comment as to CFN Services Inc.-California, an unknown business entity, via mail service
  8. Comment - defendants' inability to respond
  9. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment to respond- defendants- ** order to respond by 11/7/22 **
  10. Comment Motion to Compel Arbitration
  11. Comment Declaration of Kaleb Judy ISO MTCA
  12. Comment Declaration of Bennett ISO MTCA
  13. Comment of Association of Counsel
  14. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  15. Comment Opposition To Defendants Motion To Compel Arbitration
  16. Comment Declaration Of Plaintiff Priscilla Herrera In Support Of Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendants Motion To Compel Arbitration
  17. Comment Declaration Of Carlos Jimenez In Support Of Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendants Motion To Compel Arbitration
  18. Comment Plaintiffs Objections To Evidence Submitted In Support Of Defendants Motion To Compel Arbitration
  19. Comment Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration
  20. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 11/7/22 Defendants Motion to Compel Arbitration
  21. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Denying Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration The above-entitled action, having come before the Court on December 15, 2022, at 8:30 a.m., regarding the Motion to Compel Arbitration of Defendants Centre for Neuro Skills, CFN Services Inc., and CFN Services, Inc. - California, (collectively "CNS" or "Defendants"). After reviewing the papers filed and hearing from all parties present, and upon a showing of Good Cause, ORDERS as follows: 1. Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Action is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  22. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re: Proposed Order and Proof of Service, Order was signed 12/16/2022, if this is an amended order please state "Amended" in the title caption
  23. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re Case Management Statement: Title of Plaintiff listed under "Attorney For (Name):" is incorrect.
  24. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re Case Management Statement: Please Verify the title of Party listed under "Attorney For".
  25. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Notice of Appeal, form is to be filed with the Appeals Division
  26. Comment F085587
  27. Comment not suitable/not selected (as appropriate) for mediation.
  28. Comment Amended for Appellant's Designation
  29. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  30. Comment Civil Case Info. Sheet
  31. Comment Civil Case Info. Sheet
  32. Comment Reporter's Transcript on Appeal.
  33. Comment Record on Appeal Rejected - Corrections needed to Reporters Transcript. Due: 3/30/23
  34. Comment Corrected RT
  35. Comment Received From: 5DCA
  36. Comment Application for Extension of Time to File Brief
  37. Comment Application to file an EOT for AOB
  38. Comment re Case Management Statement
  39. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Matter stayed 01/31/23. Cont'd from 01/31/23 re status of appeal
  40. Comment Appellants opening brief
  41. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Matter stayed 01/31/23. Cont'd from 01/31/23, 07/31/23 re status of appeal

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more