Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-22
Status Pending
Type 16 Cv Fraud Civil Unlimited
Docket 44 entries
Disposition DEFAULT

Parties

Plaintiff Rubio, Jose Manuel | Rubio, Maria Jesus
Defendant Forcucci, Ronald Joseph
Photo of Hon. Zulfa David

Judge

Hon. Zulfa David

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Comment By clerk, as to plaintiff Maria Jesus Rubio. Returned via USPS.
  2. Comment By clerk, as to plaintiff Jose Manuel Rubio. Returned via USPS.
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 03/13/2023 Hearing Time: 8:30AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  4. Served 04/12/20235:14 PM Unserved
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of service
  6. Comment of Unsuccessful Service as to Dan Perez, 2 attempts
  7. View Document First Amended Complaint
  8. View Document Civil Case Cover Sheet - First Amended Complaint Comment First Amended Complaint
  9. Comment Summons on First Amended Complaint; Summons does not conform to the First Amended Complaint
  10. Comment First Amended Complaint
  11. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Forcucci Maintenice and Repair/Ronald Joseph Forcucci- Answer to Cross Complaint
  12. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  13. Comment Spanish Interpreter for 03/13/2023 at 8:30 a.m. in Div. J
  14. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Paper Filing Packet: Rejected per filer, he will be submitting and answer to First Amended Complaint.
  15. Comment Spanish Interpreter for 02/10/2023 at 8:30 a.m. in Div. J
  16. Comment Spanish Interpreter for 02/10/2023 at 8:30 a.m. in Div. J
  17. Comment Spanish Interpreter for 03/13/2023 at 8:30 a.m. in Div. J
  18. Comment re: Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint Hearing Date: 2/10/2023 Time: 8:30 am Department/Division: J
  19. Comment RE:Motion for Leave
  20. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer: Title unclear if answering to complaint, or first amended complaint. Companies must be represented by an attorney. Answer is not signed or signature was cut off. FW001 & FW-003: Can not be accepted without Answer.
  21. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 1/13/2023 PL mt for leave to Amended
  22. Comment by clerk as to defendant Ronald Joseph Forcucci
  23. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment AMENDED COMPLAINT: Face page does not note Amended Complaint Number. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET: Please make note of number of Amended Civil Case Cover Sheet. SUMMONS: Title does not note number of Amended Complaint
  24. Comment FOR SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
  25. Comment on Second Amended Complaint
  26. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer to Cross Complaint: No Cross Complaint has been filed into case. Party Names do not confrom to Case. per phone conversation Document is for a different case than the one listed on Answer. FW001/FW003: Missing court address. Case number listed does not match number listed on Answer.
  27. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued - Party's Motion Hearing
  28. Comment Spanish Interpreter
  29. Comment of Second Amended Complaint as to Ronald Joseph Forcucci DBA FORCUCCI GENERAL CONSTRUCTION & LANDSCAPE CONTRUCTION, via Personal service
  30. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  31. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment cont from 3/13/23
  32. Comment and Show Cause as to Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed
  33. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment cont from 3/13/23, 05/30/23
  34. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment cont'd from 05/30/23
  35. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Re Entry of Default - No Answer filed to Second Amended Complaint
  36. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Re: Imposition of Sanctions in the amount of $250 as to Defendant Ronald Joseph Forcucci dba Forcucci General Construction & Landscape Construction for FTA at CMC hearing on May 30, 2023 & purs. to CCP 575.2.
  37. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment cont'd from 05/30/23, 08/03/23

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more