Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-12-06
Status Pending
Type 16 Cv Fraud Civil Unlimited
Docket 65 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Efrain Cabrera, As Administrator Of The Estate Of Margarito Cabrera Aleman, Aka Margarito Cabrera|Smart Home Realty, Inc., A California Corporation|Efrain Cabrera As Administrator Of The Estate Of Margarito Cabrera Aleman cabrera , Efrain smart Home Realty, Inc. vigil , Shawn velasco , Veronica
Defendant Yanez, Claudia|Cross efrain Cabrera As Administrator Of The Estate Of Margarito Cabrera Aleman|Cross cabrera , Efrain|Cross smart Home Realty, Inc.|Cross vigil , Shawn|Cross velasco , Veronica
Photo of Hon. Clark, Thomas S.|Brumfield, Lorna H.|Chapin, Sidney P.

Judge

Hon. Clark, Thomas S.|Brumfield, Lorna H.|Chapin, Sidney P.

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 04/11/2023 Hearing Time: 8:30AM Hearing Department/Division: 17
  2. Unserved
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  4. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment continued from 04/11/2023
  5. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment RE: Application and Order for publication
  6. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Comment continued from 06/26/2023
  7. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment continued from 06/26/2023
  10. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Case Management Conference 10/20/2023 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held Comment continued from 06/26/2023
  11. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Order to Show Cause - CRC 3.110 06/26/2023 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed Comment continued from 06/26/2023
  12. Comment Granted by Clerk. A copy of the order was mailed to applicant.
  13. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Caption does not conform exact to filed complaint. Review lines 11-17.
  14. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- Caption does not conform exact to filed complaint. Review lines 11-17. Ensure defendants name conforms throughout in header and body.
  15. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - rejected 11/15/2023. Summons- Incorrect court address listed.
  16. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Answer- defendants name does not conform to complaint. If sued as a different name please specify what name you are being sued as along with the corrected name.Answer- defendants name does not conform in header and body. It is unclear how name is to be listed. See line 4, caption under case number and line 27.
  17. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Cross action listed does not conform exact to complaint filed. See line 17 on page 1.
  18. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Summons - Cross complaint rejected 11/21/2023. Please re-file with corrected cross complaint.
  19. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment **7th rejection **Answer - Cross complaint rejected 11/27/2023. Cross complaint - Party name has been designated/corrected in answer submission. Erroneously named to be removed from caption.
  20. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Missing first appearance fees. Summons- does not conform exact to cross complaint. Review al party information and ensure it conforms exact.
  21. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Caption does not conform to body. Review/correct and re-submit.
  22. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Cross complaint - Caption does not conform to body. Review Line 1 on page 1.Correct and re-submit.
  23. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 12/06/2023
  24. View Document Case Management Conference 10/20/2023 View Document Case Management Conference 12/19/2023 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held Comment continued from 10/20/2023
  25. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment The answer of defendant is inconsistent. The name in the upper left header just beneath the attorney information does not match the body of the answer. The true name of the Defendant must be consistent throughout the answer. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated.
  26. Comment to Cross-Complaint
  27. Comment Former Attorney: Marc P Grismer. New Attorney: Paul P Cheng
  28. Comment Former Attorney: Marc P Grismer. New Attorney: Paul P Cheng
  29. Comment Former Attorney: Marc P Grismer. New Attorney: Paul P Cheng
  30. Comment Former Attorney: Marc P Grismer. New Attorney: Paul P Cheng
  31. View Document Ruling 05/21/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 11:30 AM Result Ruling
  32. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT: Outdated form please use Form with Rev. date January 1, 2024. Also, Department 17 STREET address is 1415 Truxtun Ave & the MAILING address is 1215 Truxtun Ave.
  33. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT: Outdated form please use Form with Rev. date January 1, 2024. Also, Department 17 STREET address is 1415 Truxtun Ave & the MAILING address is 1215 Truxtun Ave.
  34. Comment for Plaintiff, Efrain Cabrera
  35. Comment for Defendant, Claudia Yanez
  36. View Document Case Management Conference 12/19/2023 View Document Ruling 05/21/2024 View Document Case Management Conference 06/26/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Result Held Comment continued from 12/19/2023
  37. View Document Case Management Conference 06/26/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Comment continued from 06/26/2024 - to post fees
  45. View Document Case Management Conference 09/25/2024 Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 8:15 AM Comment continued from 09/25/2024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more