Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-13
Type Dn
Docket 29 entries
Disposition dismiss

Docket Entries

  1. Opinion Certified Serve: Banks, Thomas Serve: Brown, Charles Serve: Catalano, Peter Notice Date: 08/26/2024
  2. Document Transmitted
  3. Opinion Issued Memorandum Decision MEMORANDUM DECISION Kenworthy, J., Reverse May, J., Concur Vaidik, J., Concur Judicial Officer: Kenworthy, Dana J. Serve: Banks, Thomas Serve: Brown, Charles Serve: Catalano, Peter File Stamp: 07/01/2024
  4. Document Transmitted
  5. Case Fully Briefed Oral Argument Requested: No FB Date: 04/15/2024
  6. Transmitted to Court of Appeals
  7. Brief and Appendix - Appellant Brief - Appellant Brief - Appealed Order Volumes of Appendix: Two (2) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 02/23/24 Attorney: Banks, Thomas Attorney: Catalano, Peter Party: Rusby, Eric File Stamp: 02/23/2024
  8. Order Issued order directing appellant to file brief and appendix Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Because there is no transcript to prepare, Appellant's Brief and Appendix shall be due within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 2. Failure to timely file a brief may result in the dismissal of this appeal. See Ind. Appellate Rule 45(D). Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: Banks, Thomas Serve: Brown, Charles File Stamp: 01/24/2024
  9. Document Transmitted
  10. Appearance Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 01/24/24 Attorney: Catalano, Peter Party: Rusby, Eric File Stamp: 01/24/2024
  11. Docket Sheet Transmitted for Dismissal Nothing Filed in Furtherance of this Appeal
  12. Order Denying Motion to Reconsider order denying motion to reconsider Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: Appellee's Motion to Reconsider is denied. Crone, Brown, JJ., Robb, Sr. J., concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: Prieto-Rusby, Jenise Serve: Banks, Thomas Serve: Brown, Charles File Stamp: 08/01/2023
  13. Document Transmitted
  14. Appearance Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 07/24/23 (as stated) Attorney: Brown, Charles Party: Prieto-Rusby, Jenise File Stamp: 07/25/2023
  15. Motion to Reconsider Motion to Reconsider Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 07/17/23 (as stated) Attorney: Brown, Charles Party: Prieto-Rusby, Jenise File Stamp: 07/25/2023
  16. Notice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Motion to Reconsider Party: Prieto-Rusby, Jenise Serve: Banks, Thomas Serve: Brown, Charles File Stamp: 07/25/2023
  17. Document Transmitted
  18. Received Document Receive Date: 07/21/23 Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time appears to be premature; Notice of Completion of Transcript has not been filed. Attorney notified. PostmarkDate: 07/21/2023
  19. Appearance (Brown ) Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 07/24/23 Attorney: Brown, Charles Party: Prieto-Rusby, Jenise File Stamp: 07/24/2023
  20. Received Document Receive Date: 07/17/23 Appellee's Motion to Reconsider. Charles Brown has not appeared in this case. PostmarkDate: 07/17/2023
  21. Notice of Defect Issued Motion to Reconsider Party: Prieto-Rusby, Jenise Serve: Banks, Thomas Serve: Brown, Charles Issue Date: 07/18/2023
  22. Document Transmitted
  23. Order Granting Motion to Stay order granting motion to stay Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. Appellant's Motion to Stay is granted. 2. The Clerk of this Court is directed to send this order to the parties, Judge Larry Medlock of the Washington Circuit Court, and the Washington Circuit and Superior Courts Clerk. 3. The Washington Circuit and Superior Courts Clerk is directed to file this order under Cause Number 88C01-2011-DN-128, and, pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 77(D), the Clerk shall place the contents of this order in the Record of Judgments and Orders. Crone, Brown, JJ, Robb, Sr. J., concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Party: Rusby, Eric Serve: Banks, Thomas Serve: Brown, Charles Serve: Prieto-Rusby, Jenise File Stamp: 07/07/2023
  24. Document Transmitted
  25. Notice of Completion of Clerk's Record Transcript Not Yet Completed Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 06/20/23 File Stamp: 06/20/2023
  26. Motion to Stay Trial Court Proceedings (App.R. 39) Motion for Stay - Appellant Motion to Stay Tab A Motion to Stay Tab H Motion to Stay Tab G Motion To Stay Tab F Motion to Stay Tab E Certificate of Service- Electronically Served 06/15/23 Attorney: Banks, Thomas Party: Rusby, Eric File Stamp: 06/15/2023
  27. Notice of Appeal Filed Certificate of Service-Mailed 06/13/23 Attorney: Banks, Thomas Party: Rusby, Eric File Stamp: 06/13/2023
  28. NOA Service to Trial Court Sent Date: 06/14/2023
  29. Document Transmitted

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more