Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-17
Status Dismissed
Type 15 Cv Other Employment Civil Unlimited
Docket 28 entries
Disposition approval of settlement

Parties

Plaintiff Maria Dolores Flores, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant Sunview Vineyards Of California, Inc.
Photo of Hon. Zulfa David

Judge

Hon. Zulfa David

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 12/09/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: J
  2. Served 09/08/202211:05 AM
  3. Comment as to Sunview Vineyards of California, Inc, via personal service
  4. Comment FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (Amendments)
  5. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  6. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Joint Stipulation to Extend Defendant's Responsive Pleading Deadline Based upon the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Extend Defendant Sunview Vineyards of California, Inc.'s Responsive Pleading Deadline, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff s Complaint shall be extended to January 9, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  7. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment Joint Stipulation to further Extend Defendant's Responsive Pleading Deadline Based upon the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Further Extend Defendant Sunview Vineyards of California, Inc.'s Responsive Pleading Deadline, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to Monday, January 23, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  8. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment to Further Extend Defendant's Responsive Pleading Deadline Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to February 22, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED
  9. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re Case Management Statement Version of CM-110 filed is outdated, please use the updated version dated 9/1/2021
  10. Comment **** PAID***
  11. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re Case Management Statement: Version of CM-110 filed is outdated, please use updated version dated 9/1/2021
  12. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment Joint Stipulation to Further Extend Defendant's Responsive Pleading Deadline Based upon the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Further Extend Defendant Sunview Vineyards of California, Inc.'s Responsive Pleading Deadline, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to March 24, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  13. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  14. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment to Further Extend Defendant's Responsive Pleading Deadline Based upon the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Further Extend Defendant Sunview Vineyards of California, Inc.'s Responsive Pleading Deadline, and good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to April 24, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  15. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re Case Management Statement: Version of CM-110 filed is outdated, please use updated version dated 9/1/2021
  16. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 02/22/23
  17. Comment for Court Approval of Settlement of Civil Action Filed Pursuant to PAGA
  18. Comment in Support of Stipulation for Court Approval of Settlement of Action Filed Pursuant to PAGA
  19. Comment re Stipulaiton for Court Approval of Settlement of Civil Action Filed Pursuant to PAGA, Declaration in support of Stipulation and Proposed Order
  20. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment Granting Stipulation for Court Approval of Settlement of Civil Action Filed Pursuant to PAGA This Court, having considered Plaintiff Maria Dolores Flores and Defendant Sunview Vineyards of California, Inc.'s (collectively the "Parties") Stipulation for Court Approval of Settlement of Civil Action Filed Pursuant to PAGA, and good cause appearing, hereby GRANTS the Parties' Stipulation as follows: 1. The Parties' settlement of this civil action is approved, including Plaintiff's full and general release of all claims against Defendant; and 2. This action is hereby dismissed in its entirety: with prejudice as to Plaintiff's individual claims; with prejudice as to Plaintiff's PAGA claims; and without prejudice as to the PAGA claims of any other current or former allegedly aggrieved person(s). IT IS SO ORDERED.
  21. Comment Notice of Entry of Order Granting Stipulation for Court Approval of Settlement
  22. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment Cont'd from 02/22/23, 04/24/23

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase