Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-28
Status Judgment
Type 25 Cv Professional Negligence Civil Unlimited
Docket 41 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Huckaby, Janice
Defendant Bhaika, Harpal Singh, M.d. | Angeles, Gloria C
Photo of Hon. Zulfa David

Judge

Hon. Zulfa David

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment TO: Attorney, RE: Summons REASON: incorrect entry in case # field
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 05/17/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: J
  3. Unserved
  4. Comment Notice of Demurrer and Demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint of Defendant Harpal Bhaika, M.D.
  5. Comment Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendat Harpal Bhaika, M.D.'s Demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint.
  6. Comment Declaration of Alan J. Mish ISO Harpal Bhaika, M.D.'s Demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint
  7. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other
  8. Comment Plaintiff's Opposition to Dr. Bhaika's Demurrer
  9. Comment Defendant Harpal Bhaika, M.D. Reply Brief
  10. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 5/11/2022: Defendants Notice of Demurrer and Demurrer to Plaintiffs Complaint of Defendant Bhaika Harpal Singh M.D.
  11. Comment Verified Answer to Complaint
  12. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  13. Comment Time estimate: 4 days The above entitled matter is set for Mandatory Settlement Conference on June 23, 2023 at 9:00 AM in Division H. The above entitled matter is set for Final Case Management Conference on July 21, 2023 at 1:30 PM in Division J before the Honorable J. Eric Bradshaw (see pretrial rules on the next page). The above entitled matter is set for Trial on July 24, 2023 at 9:30 AM in Division J before the Honorable J. Eric Bradshaw. Your attention is directed to the attached special rules relating to settlement conferences and the California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1380. Duty of the attorneys as to settlement conference: Except as otherwise directed by the Court for good cause shown, all parties, their attorneys and, when a party is insured, a representative of the insurance company who has the authority to settle such case, shall attend the settlement conference
  14. Comment Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment
  15. Comment Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Harpal Singh Bhaika, M.D
  16. Comment Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
  17. Comment Declaration of James W. Ostroff, M.D. in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
  18. Comment Declaration of Alan J. Mish in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Harpal Singh Bhaika, M.D.
  19. Comment Plaintiff Janince Huckaby's Evidentuary Objections to Dr. Ostroff, M.D.'s Declaration
  20. Comment of Dr. Vikram Singh, M.D. Declaration Re Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
  21. Comment in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
  22. Comment Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
  23. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re: Objection to Dr. Ostroff Declaration, Declaration of Dr. Vikram Singh, Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts and Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, filings are duplicates.
  24. Comment Reply to Pltf's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment
  25. Comment DOE 1 - Gloria C. Angeles
  26. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 3/30/2023 Defendant Harpal Singh Bhaika, M.D. Motion for Summary Judgement
  27. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Court's Own Motion Comment FCMC: 07/21/2023 at 1:30pm in Div J; Jury Trial: 07/24/2023 at 9:30am in Div J; T/E: 4 days
  28. Comment to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
  29. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Re: Letter dated 06/27/2023, please file the letter with the proposed order and email correspondence as one document and also file the proposed order as a separate/stand alone document.
  30. Comment re Proposed Order on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
  31. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Comment The court, having reviewed all the submitted papers and hearing oral argument, ruled as follows: 1. The Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The Motion for Summary Judgment is granted on the basis that the statute of limitations expired prior to the filing of the Complaint. The tolling provisions in place for COVID had expired prior to the date of injury in this case. Because the court ruled on a procedural issue, the court did not address the merits of the Motion for Summary Judgment. 2. Plaintiff's counsel, after receiving the ruling fiom the court, requested that the case be dismissed. The court granted the motion to dismiss the entire action. 3. In addition, the court overruled plaintiff's objections in opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. 4. The court therefore orders that the Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in favor of Harpal Bhaika, M.D. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  32. Comment Notice of Entry of Order on Motion for Summary Judgment
  33. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 01:30 PM Cancel Reason Court's Own Motion
  34. Judicial Officer Zulfa, David Hearing Time 09:30 AM Cancel Reason Court's Own Motion Comment T/E 4 days; Jury for Defendant

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more