Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-22
Status Dismissed
Type 23 Cv Other Pi/pd/wd Civil Unlimited
Docket 38 entries
Disposition Notice of Entry of Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Stanhope, Paul
Defendant Cdcr
Photo of Hon. Bradshaw, J. Eric

Judge

Hon. Bradshaw, J. Eric

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Comment Ca Correctional Institution form re: Prisoner documents mailed to the Court for filing
  2. Comment page 2 of Request to Waive Court Fees was not included in filing.
  3. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 06/08/2022 Hearing Time: 8:30 am Hearing Department/Division: J
  4. Served 09/13/202212:32 PM
  5. Comment Second Request
  6. Comment Letter From: Plaintiff Paul Stanhope Date of Letter: 3/9/2022 Re: Submission of Second Request to Waive Court Fees
  7. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Order to Show Cause @ 8:30 am on 6/8/22
  8. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  9. Comment of Unsuccessful Service as to CDCR, 1 attempt
  10. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Plaintiff's Petition for Order by Court to Allow Substitute Service by Mail
  11. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Order to Show Cause @ 8:30 am on 8/9/22
  12. Comment Plaintiff's Petition for Order by Court to allow Substitute Service by mail for good cause.
  13. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 06/08/22
  14. Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Ruling
  15. Comment Courtcall confirmation- hearings: 10/21/22 OSC and CMC @ 8:30 in Div J
  16. Comment as to CDCR, via personal service
  17. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment To: Audra Christine Call Re: CMC Statement Reason: First Appearance fees for the Defendant are due. Also, please update the Court address to 1215 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield CA 93301. Please review.
  18. Comment Defendant's Notic eof Demurrer and Demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof
  19. Comment Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendant's Demurrer to Complaint
  20. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  21. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed Comment Cont'd from 06/08/22, 08/09/22
  22. Comment as to Paul Stanhope
  23. Comment Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Demurrer and Mtoion to Strike the Demurrer
  24. Comment Reply in support of defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's complaint
  25. Comment Courtcall confirmed as to Plaintiff for proceedings on 11/21/22
  26. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Comment Further Case Management Conference 11/21/22 @ 8:30 am in Division J
  27. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 10/13/2022 Defendants Demurrer and Request for Judicial Notice
  28. Judicial Officer Bradshaw, J. Eric Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment cont from 10/21/22
  29. Comment Notice of Non-Opposition and Non-Response to Proposed Order after hearing
  30. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Comment on Demurrer Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations' ("CDCR") Demurrer to Plaintiff's Complaint came on regularly for hearing on November 21, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. in Department J of the Kern County Superior Court before the Honorable Eric Bradshaw. The Court ruled as follows: 1. Defendant CDCR's Demurrer is sustained; 2. Defendant CDCR is entitled to immunity as to the allegations in the Complaint based upon Government Code 844.6 and 815(a); 3. Plaintiff has not pleaded any statutory basis for liability against Defendant CDCR; 4. Defendant CDCR's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Demurrer is granted; 5. Leave to amend the Complaint is denied; 6. Plaintiff's Complaint is ordered dimissed; 7. Defendant CDCR is to prepare a proposed order consistent with the ruling articulated by the Court at the hearing.
  31. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment This document is a Notice of Entry of Order not a Notice of Entry of Judgment. Please review and correct 1st page.
  32. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment The said attachment is missing. Spoke to Ms. Call, her office will resubmit.
  33. Comment Notice of Entry of Order on Demurrer

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more