Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-25
Status Pending
Type 25 Cv Professional Negligence Civil Unlimited
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Regla, Nicanor
Defendant Gillet, Phillip W., Jr.
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Comment BY CLERK AS TO PLAINTIFF NICANOR REGLA
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 5/11/2023 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: H
  3. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment FW-001: NAME DID NOT CONFORM TO COMPLAINT NOR THE FW-003
  4. Unserved
  5. Comment Summons
  6. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  7. Comment Regarding the Order to Show Cause CRC 3.110
  8. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 05/11/23
  9. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued - Party's Motion Hearing
  10. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued - Party's Motion Hearing Comment Cont'd from 05/11/23, 06/14/23
  11. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment cont from 7/25/23
  12. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Cont'd from 05/11/23, 06/14/23, 7/25/23
  13. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment re: Sanctions directed to Plaintiff's counsel Joseph Klatt to show cause why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty and 00/100 Dollars ($250.00) for failing to appear at the Case Management Conference & OSC CRC 3.110 on 07/25/23 and pursuant to CRC Rule 2.30(c).
  14. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment Directed to Plaintiff's counsel Joseph Klatt for failing to appear at the Case Management Conference & OSC CRC 3.110 on 07/25/23 and pursuant to CRC Rule 2.30(c).
  17. Comment as to Phillip W Gillet Jr via sub service
  18. Comment As to Phillip W. Gillet, Jr. on complaint filed 1/25/23
  19. View Document Further Case Management Conference 12/27/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 07/25/23, 10/27/23
  20. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed Comment Cont'd from 05/11/23, 06/14/23, 07/25/23, 10/27/23
  21. View Document Further Case Management Conference 03/27/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 07/25/23, 10/27/23, 12/27/23
  22. Comment Re: Imposition of Sanction Hearing Date: 6/28/2024 Hearing Time: 8:30 a.m Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  23. Comment Motion to Set Aside the Default
  24. View Document Further Case Management Conference 06/28/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Continued from 7/25/23, 10/27/23, 12/27/23, 03/27/2024
  25. View Document Further Case Management Conference 06/28/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment re: Sanctions directed to Plaintiff's counsel to show cause why the Court should not impose monetary sanctions $250 pursuant to CRC Rule 2.30 for FTA at the CMC on 03/27/2024 and FTC with CRC, Rules 3.720 - 3.730.
  26. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Opposition to motion to set aside: Case number is missing
  27. Comment Opposition
  28. View Document Motion to Set Aside (Pre-Disposition) 07/18/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 6/24/2024 Motion to set aside
  29. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment cont. from 07/25/23, 10/27/23, 03/27/24, 06/28/24

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more