Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-15
Status Pending
Type 42 Cv Other Complaint Civil Unlimited
Docket 53 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Singh, Robert
Defendant Lampkin, Roger N.
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Comment BY CLERK
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: OSC CRC 3.110 Hearing Date: 10/04/2023 Hearing Time: 08:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  3. Unserved
  4. Comment Affidavit of Unsuccessful Service
  5. Comment ON FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
  6. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  7. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  12. Comment Notice of and Demurrer to First Amended Complaint
  13. Comment 12/18/2023 8:30 A.M. Traffic Courtroom 2
  14. Comment Case management conference statement
  15. Comment notice of motion to strike
  16. Comment Motion to Strike
  17. Comment on Motion to Strike
  18. View Document Ruling 11/22/2023 Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Ruling Comment Reset Demurrer to First Amemded Complaint Hearing
  19. View Document Motion to Strike / Demurrer First Amended Complaint 12/01/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 11/2/2023 DE Demurrer to to First Amended Complaint; Reset from 11/29/2023
  20. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 11/13/2023 Defendant Roger N. Lampkin (In Propria Persona) Motion to Strike the First Amended Complaint
  21. Comment RE: Case Management Conference Statement
  22. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed Comment cont from 10/4/23
  23. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Demurrer / Motion to Strike / Case Management Conference 12/19/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  24. View Document Motion to Strike / Demurrer First Amended Complaint 12/01/2023 View Document Demurrer / Motion to Strike / Case Management Conference 12/19/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 11/2/2023 DE Demurrer to to First Amended Complaint; Reset from 11/29/2023
  25. View Document Demurrer / Motion to Strike / Case Management Conference 12/19/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 11/13/2023 Defendant Roger N. Lampkin (In Propria Persona) Motion to Strike the First Amended Complaint
  26. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Comment Order RE: Defendant's Motion to Strike and Demurrer - hearing held 12/19/2023
  27. Comment NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER; Order re Motion to Strike and Demurrer to First Amended Complaint
  28. Comment AMENDED NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER Motion to Strike Portions of First Amended Complaint and Demurrer to First Amended Complaint
  29. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Second Amended Complaint- No prayer amount listed.
  30. Unserved
  31. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  32. View Document Further Case Management Conference 03/13/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 12/19/23
  33. Comment Defendant's Notice of Hearing
  34. Comment Defendants Demurrer to Second Amended Complaint of Robert Singh; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support thereof
  35. Comment Proof of Service by Mail regarding Demurrer to Second Amended complaint
  36. View Document Demurrer 04/23/2024 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 3/19/2024 Defendant's Demurrer
  37. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment General denial- Defendants name does not conform to complaint. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated. * please use the correct address of the civil division: at 1215 Truxtun avenue, Bakersfield, ca 93301. *Proof of service is missing * Caption does not reference the operative complaint. Second amended complaint was filed 02/20/2024.
  38. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment General denial- Defendants name does not conform to the second amended complaint filed 2/20/2024. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated. Missing proof of service.
  39. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Proof of Service re General Denial. Reason: General Denial was rejected on 5/17/2024. The proof of service must be filed with the General Denial
  40. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment General Denial - Caption does not conform exact to Second Amended complaint. Review verbiage as to all parties. Please ensure caption conforms exact to operative complaint. General denial- Defendants name does not conform to the second amended complaint filed 2/20/2024. Party names are to be listed as they appear in the case. If parties are erroneously sued this should be stated on #1. *Court address listed is incorrect
  41. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S. Hearing Time 10:00 AM Comment FCMC: 01/10/2025 // JT: 01/13/2025 // T/E: 2 DAYS (T-2)
  42. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 01:30 PM Comment CT: 1/13/25 T/E 2DAYS
  43. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 9:00 AM Comment T/E 2DAYS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more