Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-03
Status View Document Conference 03/01/2024
Type 39 Cv Other Judicial Review Civil Unlimited
Docket 65 entries

Parties

Plaintiff The People Of The State Of California Ex. Rel. The City Of California City
Defendant Macedonio, Karen
Photo of Hon. Barmann Bernard C Jr

Judge

Hon. Barmann Bernard C Jr

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: OSC CRC 3.110 Hearing Date: 10/25/2023 Hearing Time: 08:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: H
  2. Served 07/14/20233:30 PM
  3. Comment as to Karen Macedonuo, via Personal service
  4. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  5. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  8. Comment of Kelly Kulikoff
  9. Comment Proof of Service in Support of Plaintiff's Ex-Parte Application
  10. Comment Notice Of Taking Ex Parte Application Off Calendar
  11. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment Plaintiff/Realtor's Ex-Parte Application for Order Allowing Plaintiff-Realtor to File Motion for Summary Judgment Fewer than 60 Days After Defendant's General Appearance, or in the Alternative, Setting the Matter for Bench Trial and Establishing a Briefing Schedule
  12. Comment Plaintiff/Relator's Ex-Parte Application for Order Allowing Plaintiff-Relator to File Motion for Summary Judgment Fewer than 60 Days After Defendant's General Appearance, or in the Alternative, Setting the Matter for Bench Trial and Establishing a Briefing Schedule
  13. Comment of Mayor Pro Tem Ronald Smith in Support of Ex-Parte Application
  14. Comment RE: Plaintiff's Ex-Parte for MSJ
  15. Comment of Gregory Maestri in Support of Ex-Parte Application
  16. Comment In Support of Ex-Parte Application
  17. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 09/12/2023 Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Plaintiff/Relator's Ex-Parte Application for Order Allowing Plaintiff-Relator to File Motion for Summary Judgment Fewer than 60 Days After Defendant's General Appearance, or in the Alternative, Setting the Matter for Bench Trial and Establishing a Briefing Schedule
  18. Comment of Ruling RE: Ex-Parte Hearing RE: Order Setting the Matter for Bench Trial and Establishing a Briefing Schedule
  19. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Comment RE: Ex-Parte Setting the Matter for Bench Trial & Establishing a Briefing Schedule
  20. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  21. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment TO: Allison E. Burns, Esq.; Gregory J. Maestri, Esq. RE: Notice of Change of Address or Other Contact Information REASON: Plaintiff's name as listed on item 1 does not fully conform to Complaint; attorney/firm listed in item 2 is not currently an attorney of record for plaintiff. This is not the correct form if you are trying to associate another attorney/firm or if you are trying to substitue attorneys.
  22. Comment Notice of Change of Law Firm Affiliation and Contact Information for Plaintiff's Counsel, Victor Ponto
  23. View Document Ruling 12/26/2023 Hearing Time 11:00 AM Result Ruling Comment Court Trial re-set
  24. Comment PLAINTIFF/RELATORS OPENING TRIAL BRIEF
  25. Comment Declaration of Allison E. Burns in Support of Plaintiff/Realtor's Opening Trial Brief
  26. Comment Declaration of Socorro Chavez
  27. Comment Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Plaintiff/Realtor's Opening Trial Brief
  28. Comment Appendix of Exhibits in Support of Opening Brief
  29. Comment as to Amended answer
  30. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Court's Own Motion
  31. Comment Case Management Brief
  32. Comment [PROPOSED] WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO TO REMOVE KAREN MACEDONIO FROM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY (Comment)
  33. Comment Defendant's Trial Brief in Opposition to Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff
  34. Comment Defendant's Declaration ISO Trial Brief
  35. Comment re Trial Brief
  36. Comment Notice of change of firm name
  37. Comment Defendant's Final Case Management Statement
  38. Comment at the Final CMC
  39. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 09/12/2023 View Document Final Case Management Conference 01/19/2024 Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 01:30 PM Result Held Comment COURT TRIAL 1/26/24 @ 1:30PM
  40. Comment Plaintiff/Relator's Reply Brief
  41. Comment Plaintiff/Relator's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Karen Macedonio
  42. Comment Notice of Ruling at Final Case Management Conference re: Hearing and Briefing Schedule
  43. View Document Ex Parte Hearing - Pre-Disposition 09/12/2023 View Document Ruling 12/26/2023 Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment SET FROM 9/12/23 - re-set from 01/26/24
  44. Comment Plaintiff/Relator's Opening Brief per Court Order
  45. Comment Defendant Karen Macedonio's Brief re: (1) Mootness of Action; (2) Who the Prevailing Party is; and (3) What the Trial Will Involve if the Case is Not Dismissed
  46. Comment of: Defendant Karen Macedonio's Brief re: (1) Mootness of Action; (2) Who the Prevailing Party is; and (3) What the Trial Will Involve if the Case is Not Dismissed
  47. Comment Plaintiff/Relator's Reply Brief Per Court Order
  48. Comment as to plaintiff's counsel
  49. Comment Defendant Karen Macedonio's Brief in Reply to Plaintiff's Opening Brief re: (1) Mootness of Action; (2) Who the Prevailing Party Is; And (3) What the Trial Will Involve if the Case is Not Dismissed
  50. Comment - defendant's counsel
  51. Comment Proof of Service
  52. View Document Case Status Conference 03/01/2024 Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 01:30 PM Result Held Comment re: briefing/ mootness of case
  53. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment - [proposed] Judgment -- The page for Judicial Officer's signature and signature date must include at least 3 lines of text (words) as to actual verbiage of the Judgment/Order.
  54. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Comment GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 1. For the reasons set forth above, that the entire above-entitled action be and hereby is dismissed as moot, without prejudice. 2. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1032, Relator is the prevailing party and is entitled to recover reasonable costs, upon filing of a cost memorandum, pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1700. 3. The Court retains jurisdiction to hear post-judgment motions, if any. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  55. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment TO: Allison E. Burns, Esq./ Gregory Maestri, Esq. RE: Memorandum of Costs (Summary) / form MC-010 - envelope #15200369, 05/01/2024 REASON: -1) Incorrect Court address. Effective January 3, 2022 the Civil Department is located at 1215 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301. -2) party name of Plaintiff as listed in the caption boxes does not conform- it's incomplete. Plaintiff's name in the case is 'The People of the State of California ex rel. The City of California City'
  56. Comment as to Judgment filed 04/04/2024 - total costs in the amount of $3,736.05 . Filed by Allison E. Burns, Esq.
  57. Comment for the amount of $3,736.05 as stated on the Memorandum of Costs filed 05/07/2024.
  58. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment 1) Court address is incorrect. Please correct to reflect 1215 Truxtun Avenue. 2) #1d - summons served at or mailed to (name and address) - is incomplete and does not conform to the Proof of Service on file. 3) #11 is incomplete. 4) #12 is incomplete. Please review and revise accordingly.
  59. Comment of Judgment as to Karen Macedonio

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more