Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-24
Status Judgment
Type 26 Cv Other Real Property Civil Unlimited
Docket 35 entries
Disposition judgment entered

Parties

Plaintiff Stansberry, Betty|Stansberry, Betty|Stansberry, Betty|Stansberry, Betty|Stansberry, Betty
Defendant All Persons Unknown, Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien, Or Interest In The Property Described In The Complaint Adverse To Plaintiff's Title, Or Any Cloud Upon Plaintiff's Title Thereto
Photo of Hon. Non, Fast Track

Judge

Hon. Non, Fast Track

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) Comment Re: OSC CRC 3.110 Hearing Date: 11/09/2023 Hearing Time: 08:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: L
  2. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice-CCCS Comment RE: CCCS
  3. Unserved
  4. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  5. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  8. Comment NO Proof of Service on file also cannot Default Does
  9. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  10. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  11. Comment as to All persons unknown, claiming ay legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintiff's title or any cloud upon Plaintiff's title thereto via Publication
  12. Comment Second rejection cannot Default Does they must be named or Dismissed.
  13. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC-NFT (N18C) View Document Case Management Conference 01/23/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  14. View Document Case Management Conference 01/23/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Re: Dismissal Cont from 11/09/23
  15. Comment With prejudice as to Does 1-10
  16. Comment As to All Persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or interest In the property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintiffs Title, or any cloud upon Plaintiffs Title Thereto on complaint filed 7/24/23
  17. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Premature / No CIV-100 Requesting Court Judgment has been filed the party was only Defaulted 1/23/2024 you must also request Court Judgment prior to filing for Proposed Court Judgment
  18. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Court Judgment Packet Comment Court Judgment Packet
  19. Comment As to All Persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or interest In the property described in the Complaint adverse to Plaintiffs Title, or any cloud upon Plaintiffs Title Thereto on complaint filed 7/24/23
  20. Comment Declaration for Default 585d
  21. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Judgment - per Commissioner a Prove-up hearing is required on Quiet Title.
  22. View Document Case Management Conference 03/25/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Continued from 0123/2024
  23. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed Comment Continued from 11/09/2023,01/23/2024
  24. Comment Prove-up hearing set for 4/4/2024 @ 8:30 am D-L
  25. View Document Default 04/04/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Held Comment Prove-up
  26. Comment Next hrg. 4/11/24- Plaintiff
  27. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M.
  28. Comment Re. Amended Declaration in Support of Application for Default Judgment 585(d)
  29. Comment in Suppport of Christine James With Supporting Evidence for Default Prove-Up Hearing
  30. View Document Default 04/11/2024 Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 08:30 AM Result Held Comment Prove-up Cont from 04/04/24
  31. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Comment Against All Persons Unknown, Claiming Any Legal Or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien, Or Interest in the Property Decribed in the Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff's Title, Or Any Cloud Upon Plaintiff's Title Thereto.
  32. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Judgment Entered Comment Continued from 0123/2024, 03/25/24
  33. Judicial Officer Cervantes, Gina M. Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Judgment Entered Comment as to Plaintiff's Counsel for FTA at CMC on 03/25/24

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more