Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-02-06
Status Dismissed
Type 23 Cv Other Pi/pd/wd Civil Unlimited
Docket 110 entries
Disposition dismiss
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 7/25/2023 Hearing Time: 8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: T-2
  2. Served 04/13/20233:27 PM Served 04/27/20231:29 PM Served 04/27/20231:29 PM
  3. Comment as to Riverland Homes, Inc., via Sub-service
  4. Comment as to Sonny Estrada, by Personal Service
  5. Comment as to Jorge Estrada, by Personal Service
  6. Comment ON ANSWER
  7. Comment Proof of Service on Answer
  8. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT: LEAVE OF COURT IS REQUIRED, ANSWER'S HAVE BEEN FILED.
  9. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Proof Of Service Filed
  10. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  15. Comment 10/9/2023 8:30 Traffic Courtroom 2
  16. Comment Notice of Jury Fee Deposit
  17. Comment Proof of Service
  18. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Case management statement by "Prospective Intervenor" Insurance Company of the West; Reason: Intervenor Insurance Company of the West is not a party to this action. The form CM-110 revised July 1, 2011 is outdated. Must use mandatory judicial council form CM-110 Revised September 1, 2021 and attach proof of service on opposing counsel.
  19. Comment PROSPECTIVE INTERVENOR S NOTICE OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
  20. Comment re: Motion to Intervene
  21. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) View Document Case Management Conference 10/09/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  22. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT - MUST SEE LEAVE TO FILE
  23. Comment Notice of Continued Case Management Conference to 11/27/23, 8:30 a.m., T-2
  24. Comment PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PROSEPCTIVE INTERVENOR INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WESTS MOTION TO INTERVENE
  25. Comment Motion to Strike portions of First Amended Complaint.
  26. Comment Motion to Strike portions of First Amended Complaint.
  27. Comment as to Answer
  28. Comment 11/27/2023 8:30 Traffic Courtroom 2
  29. Comment 11/27/23 8:30 a.m. Traffic Courtroom 2
  30. View Document Case Management Conference / Motion (Pre-Disposition) 11/27/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment 10/6/2023 Intervener: Motion to intervene
  31. Original Type Further Case Management Conference View Document Case Management Conference / Motion (Pre-Disposition) 11/27/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 10/09/23
  32. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Comment for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention
  33. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Summons does not conform exact to complaint. Please review party information (including does information).
  34. Comment on Complaint in Intervention
  35. Comment Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Sonny Estrada's motion to strike
  36. Comment Reply Points and Authorities in Support of Sonny Estrada's Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by Sonny Estrada
  37. Comment Proof of Service regarding Reply in support of Motion to Strike
  38. View Document Motion to Strike / Case Management Conference 12/14/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 11/13/23 Defendant Sonny Estrada's Motion to Strike Portions of the First Amended Complaint
  39. View Document Motion to Strike / Case Management Conference 12/14/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Cont'd from 10/09/23, 11/27/23
  40. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Proposed Order Denying Motion to Strike; Reason: pursuant to the filing party's request, envelope number 13879819 is returned prior to the court's filing.
  41. Comment Notice of Filing [Proposed] Order
  42. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Comment MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; Defendant Sonny Estrada to file an Answer to First Amended Complaint within 20 days of the formal entry of the court's order.
  43. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt
  44. Comment as to Sonny Estrada's answer to first amended complaint
  45. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment 2nd Rejection: Missing Mandatory Judicial Council Form POS-010. Attach the Notice and Acknowledgement of Receipt behind the completed POS-010 as one filed document. Please note only one Proof of Service per listed, conformed defendant. Review and revise accordingly.
  46. Comment as to Answer-Complaint in Intervention
  47. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service on Complaint in Intervention
  48. Comment re Stipulation for Order Permitting Filing of Cross Complaint
  49. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Comment Order Permitting Filing of Cross-Complaint by Riverland Homes, Inc.,
  50. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  51. Comment as to cross complaint
  52. Cross Action Cross-Complaint File Date 02/06/2024
  53. Comment Notice of Entry of Order re Stipulation and Order Permitting Defendants to File Cross-Complaint
  54. Comment Proof of Service re Notice of Entry of Order
  55. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  56. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  57. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service
  58. Comment Notice of Due Diligence re: Multiple Attempts to Personally Serve Cross-Complaint of Riverland Homes, Inc., Jorge Estrada and Sonny Estrada
  59. Comment Proof of Service
  60. Comment Former Attorney: Nathan Yannone New Attorney: Peter Fitzpatrck
  61. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment re; Proof of Service on Cross Complaint
  62. Comment as to JTJ Construction, Inc., DBA Ward Concrete Construction, by mail service
  63. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Can not be filed as a stand alone document. Please review.
  64. Comment for Cross-Defendant, JTJ Construction, Inc., DBA Ward Concrete Construction
  65. Judicial Officer Barmann, Bernard C., Jr. Hearing Time 11:00 AM
  66. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 01:30 PM Comment JT: 03/03/25 // TE: 5 days // Jury requested by all parties
  67. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 9:00 AM Comment TE: 5 days // Jury requested by all parties
  86. Comment For the Following Reason(s): Complaint was dismissed on 03/21/2025
  87. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL: Proof of Service improperly attached. The Request for Dismissal is a 2 page document. Service of the Request for Dismissal is to be made once the document is filed by the Clerk. A copy of filed Request for Dismissal is to be served on other parties via form CIV-120. Please also see CRC 3.1390 and Judicial Branch Website re: Dismiss a Civil Case: https://www4.courts.ca.gov/34204.htm
  88. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment PROOF OF SERVICE: A Proof of Service improperly submitted with the Request for Dismissal. Service of the Request for Dismissal is to be made once the document is filed by the Clerk. A copy of filed Request for Dismissal is to be served on other parties via form CIV-120. Please also see CRC 3.1390 and Judicial Branch Website re: Dismiss a Civil Case: https://www4.courts.ca.gov/34204.htm
  89. Comment as to Cross Complaint filed 2/6/24 by Riverland Homes Inc.
  90. Comment of Cross Complaint
  91. Comment As to the Complaint-In-Intervention filed 11/29/23 by Company of the West
  92. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Dismissal Filed Comment as to the Complaint
  93. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Dismissal Filed Comment as to the Cross Complaint
  94. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Dismissal Filed Comment as to the Complaint in Intervention

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more