Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kern Co Non Criminal Court

Court

Kern Co Non Criminal Court

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-16
Status Dismissed
Type 08 Cv Civil Rights Civil Unlimited
Docket 44 entries
Disposition pending

Parties

Plaintiff Blackgold, Suten
Defendant Anderson, J.
Photo of Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Judge

Hon. Smith, T. Mark

Kern County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Comment AS TO PLAINTIFF SUTEN BLACKGOLD
  2. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Comment Re: 3.110 Hearing Date: 6/6/2023 Hearing Time:8:30 AM Hearing Department/Division: 17
  3. Served 03/10/202310:45 AM
  4. Judicial Officer Clark, Thomas S.
  5. Comment of Standing Order STO-23-0006
  6. Comment as to J. Anderson, via Personal service
  7. Comment courtcall confirmed for plaintiff for proceedings on 4/21/23 & 8/21/23
  8. Comment Defendant's Amended Notice of Demurrer
  9. Comment courtcall confirmed for plaintiff for proceedings on 5/17/23
  10. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Renotice Filed Comment FILED 4/7/23 DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT
  11. Comment Plaintiff's Request for Permisson to Amend their Complaint
  12. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment FILED 4/7/23 DEFENDANTS RENOTICED 4/14/2023 DEFENDANT'S DEMURRER
  13. Comment Defendant's Statement on Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Demurrer
  14. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT: COURT ADDRESS IS WRONG
  15. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason In Compliance
  16. Comment ON FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
  17. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Letter dated 6/12/2023;Reason: Improper ex parte communication. Improper form for a requesting an extension. File as an application/reequest and proposed order and attach proof of service on opposing party.
  18. Comment Defendant's Notice of Demurrer and Demurrer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support
  19. Comment Courtcall confirmation for Demurrer; 8/25/2023 8:30 Traffic Courtroom 2
  20. Comment Response to Demurrer
  21. View Document Notice of Assignment and OSC re CRC 3110 and CMC (N18C) Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  22. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Comment FILED 7/13/23 DEFENDANT'S DEMURRER
  27. Comment Transmission Verification Report Case Management Conference 11/29/2023 8:30 Traffic Courtroom 2
  28. Comment Defendant's Statement on Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Demurrer
  29. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Letter dated 9/19/2023; Reason: Not Consideresd by the Court. Improper ex parte communication . Direct or indirect communication regarding a pending case without the knowledge , presence, or consent of all parties involed in the matter cannot be considere by the court. Move the court by filing proper forms or pleading for your request.
  30. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Letter dated 9/18/2023; Reason: Not Considered by the Court. Improper Ex Parte Communication . Direct or indirect communication regarding a pending case without the knowledge , presence, or consent of all parties involed in the matter cannot be considere by the court. Move the court by filing proper forms or pleading for your request. The court clerks are prohibited from providing legal advice.
  31. Comment ON SECOND AMENDED
  32. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Response to Correspondence; Reason: The document is an improper ex parte communication and has not been considered by the court. Direct or indirect communication regarding a pending case without the knowledge , presence, or consent of all parties involed in the matter cannot be considered by the court.
  33. View Document Rejection/Correction Notice Comment Letter dated 9/26/2023; Reason: The document is an improper ex parte communication and has not been considered by the court. Direct or indirect communication regarding a pending case without the knowledge , presence, or consent of all parties involed in the matter cannot be considered by the court. Attach a proof of service on opposing counsel to all filings.
  34. Comment DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF DEMURRER AND DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT 11/14/2023 8:30 Traffic Courtroom 2 11/14/2023 8:30 a.m. Traffic Courtroom 2
  35. Comment Transmission Verification Report; for hearings: Demurrer on 11/14/2023 and Further Case Management Conference on 11/29/2023
  36. View Document Demurrer 11/14/2023 Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held Comment Filed 10/20/2023 Defendant's Demurrer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint
  37. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark Hearing Time 8:30 AM Cancel Reason Other Comment Cont'd from 08/25/2023
  38. Judicial Officer Smith, T. Mark

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more