Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Muskingum Co

Court

Muskingum Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-08-03
Status Closed
Type Ce Foreclosures
Docket 17 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant Brooks, Stacy E|Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Stacy E Brooks|Mcfee, Penny R|Mcfee, Sr, Deceased, David L|Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Legatee, Executors,
Photo of Hon. FLEEGLE MARK C

Judge

Hon. FLEEGLE MARK C

Muskingum County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. REFUND CHECK ISSUED FROM DEPOSIT TO PAUL M NALEPKA
  2. DEPOSIT ON NEW CIVIL CASE FILED. Receipt: 215219 Date: 08/03/2023
  3. MOTION FOR SERVICE BY PROCESS SERVER, PROVEST LLC FILED. Attorney: NALEPKA, PAUL M
  4. REQUEST FOR SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL and PROCESS SERVER, PROVEST LLC FILED. Attorney: NALEPKA, PAUL M
  5. PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT FILED.
  6. COPIES OF SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, AND THE FOLLOWING SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL Receipt: 216850 Date: 10/16/2023
  7. CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED Issue Date: 08/03/2023 Service: INITIAL SERVICE / CIVIL Method: CERTIFIED MAIL/CIVIL Cost Per: 0.0000 STACY E BROOKS HOME ADDRESS 25 S LINDEN AVE ZANESVILLE, OH 43701 Tracking Number: 941472669904220064075 Unknown Spouse, if any, of Stacy E Brooks HOME ADDRESS 25 S LINDEN AVENUE ZANESVILLE, OH 43701 Tracking Number: 941472669904220064076 PENNY R MCFEE HOME ADDRESS 108 VAN SANT ST ZANESVILLE, OH 43701 Tracking Number: 941472669904220064077 Receipt: 216850 Date: 10/16/2023
  8. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN INDEPENDANT PROCESS SERVER FILED. Receipt: 216850 Date: 10/16/2023
  9. COPIES OF SUMMONS, COMPLAINT ISSUED TO PROCESS SERVER FOR SERVICE ON: STACY E BROOKS and UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, AT: 25 S LINDEN AVE, ZANESVILLE, OH 43701. Receipt: 216850 Date: 10/16/2023
  10. COPIES OF SUMMONS, COMPLAINT ISSUED TO PROCESS SERVER FOR SERVICE ON: PENNY R MCFEE, AT: 108 VAN SANT ST, ZANESVILLE, OH 43701. Receipt: 216850 Date: 10/16/2023
  11. SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT FILED.
  12. NOTICE OF FAILURE OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON STACY E BROOKS and UNKNOWN SPOUSE (25 S LINDEN AVE, ZANESVILLE, OH 43701) BOTH MARKED: RETURN TO SENDER & UNCLAIMED; ATTY NOTIFIED.
  13. SUMMONS RETURNED AND FILED BY PROCESS SERVER, DUSTIN RINE. FAILURE OF SERVICE ON STACY E BROOKS & UNKNOWN SPOUSE (25 S LINDEN AVE, ZANESVILLE, OH 43701) REASON: PROPERTY IS VACANT.
  14. SUMMONS RETURNED AND FILED BY PROCESS SERVER, DUSTIN RINE. FAILURE OF SERVICE ON PENNY R MCFEE (108 VAN SANT ST, ZANESVILLE, OH 43701) REASON: SUBJECT NOT FOUND; ATTY NOTIFIED.
  15. NOTICE OF FAILURE OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL ON PENNY R MCFEE (108 VAN SANT ST, ZANESVILLE, OH 43701) MARKED: RETURN TO SENDER, ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN & UNABLE TO FORWARD; ATTY NOTIFIED.
  16. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL RULE 41(A)(2) FILED Attorney: HELMS, JEFFREY R
  17. ENTRY GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FILED. COPIES DISTRIBUTED. Receipt: 216850 Date: 10/16/2023

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more