Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-30
Status Closed
Type Civil Superior Ct (3 An)|Other Tort
Docket 35 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Griffith, David
Defendant Hemphill, Roger|Davis, Donald|Jdo Law, P.c.
Photo of Hon. Crosby, Dani R

Judge

Hon. Crosby, Dani R

Anchorage Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. [AFFIRMED] Order Upon Conclusion of Appeal in a Civil Case - Affirmed
  2. Complaint for Personal Injury and/or Property Damages Not Automobile Related Receipt: 2058027 Date: 01/30/2023
  3. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  4. Return of Service - Summons Served On: JDOLaw, P.C. (Defendant);
  5. Return of Service - Summons Served On: Roger Hemphill (Defendant);
  6. Return of Service - Summons Served On: Donald Davis (Defendant);
  7. Notice of Appearance Laura L Farley (Attorney) on behalf of JDOLaw, P.C. (Defendant)
  8. Notice of Change of Judge (Peremptory Challenge) Laura L Farley (Attorney) on behalf of JDOLaw, P.C. (Defendant)
  9. Peremptory Disqualification by Defendant/Respondent This case has been reassigned to the Honorable Judge Crosby
  10. Attorney Information Attorney Farley, Laura L representing Defendant JDOLaw, P.C. as of 02/17/2023
  11. JDO's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suit Attorney: Farley, Laura L (9211078) JDOLaw, P.C. (Defendant); Filing Party: JDOLaw, P.C. Case Motion #1
  12. Attorney Information Attorney Stone, Robert D representing Defendant Davis, Donald as of 02/28/2023
  13. Attorney Information Attorney Stone, Robert D representing Defendant Hemphill, Roger as of 02/28/2023
  14. Entry of Appearance Robert D Stone (Attorney) on behalf of Roger Hemphill, Donald Davis (Defendant)
  15. {CURED ON 03/01/2023} Civil Deficiency Memo emailed to Robert Stone RE: 1 Please file an Amended Entry of Appearance to correct Defendant's first name. The Defendant's name on the Complaint and Summons is Roger Hemphill and you have Eliot Hemphill on your Entry of Appearance (in the caption and the body). Civil Deficiency Memo (1/22) Sent on: 02/28/2023 16:48:21.50 Robert D Stone (Attorney) on behalf of Roger Hemphill, Donald Davis (Defendant)
  16. Amended Entry of Appearance Robert D Stone (Attorney) on behalf of Roger Hemphill, Donald Davis (Defendant)
  17. Plaintiff's Opposition to JDO's Rule 12(B) (6) Motion to Dismiss David Griffith (Plaintiff); Case Motion #1: JDO's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suit
  18. Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Nieed-Preexisting Duty Filed Against Jdolaw David Griffith (Plaintiff);
  19. Defendants' (Hemphill and Davis) Joinder of Civil Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Filed by JDOLaw, P.C. (linked to motion #1) Attorney: Stone, Robert D (9411128) Roger Hemphill (Defendant); Donald Davis (Defendant); Case Motion #1: JDO's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suit
  20. Notice Regarding Motion to Dismiss
  21. Plaintiff's Opposition to Jdolaw's Motion for Summary Judgment David Griffith (Plaintiff);
  22. Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to JDO's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suit Converted to Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (linked to motion #1) Case Motion #1: JDO's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suit Attorney: Farley, Laura L (9211078) JDOLaw, P.C. (Defendant);
  23. Defendants' (Hemphill and Davis) Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss (linked to motion #1) Attorney: Stone, Robert D (9411128) Roger Hemphill (Defendant); Donald Davis (Defendant); Case Motion #1: JDO's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suit
  24. Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss Case Motion #1: JDO's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suit
  25. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Court Order Dated April 18, 2023 on Pending Dismissal of Claims Self-Represented (0100001) David Griffith (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Griffith, David Case Motion #2
  26. [Amended/Corrected] Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Court Order Dated April 18, 2023 on Pending Dismissal of Claims (linked to motion #2) Self-Represented (0100001) David Griffith (Plaintiff); Case Motion #2: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Court Order Dated April 18, 2023 on Pending Dismissal of Claims
  27. Motion for Clarification Attorney: Self-Represented (0100001) David Griffith (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Griffith, David Case Motion #3
  28. Clarification of Court's April 18, 2023 Order Case Motion #3: Motion for Clarification
  29. Order Denying Reconsideration Case Motion #1: JDO's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Suit, Case Motion #2: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Court Order Dated April 18, 2023 on Pending Dismissal of Claims
  30. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Court Order Dated April 18, 2023 as it Relates to Summary Judgment Self-Represented (0100001) David Griffith (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Griffith, David Case Motion #4
  31. Order Denying Reconsideration Case Motion #4: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Court Order Dated April 18, 2023 as it Relates to Summary Judgment
  32. JDO's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Attorney: Farley, Laura L (9211078) JDOLaw, P.C. (Defendant); Filing Party: JDOLaw, P.C. Case Motion #5
  33. Order Granting Motion JDOLaw, P.C. Case Motion #5 JDO's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment
  34. Case Dismissed. Case Closed.
  35. Appeal Filed in the Supreme Court Case No: S-18804

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more