Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of New Britain County

Court

New Britain County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-06-16
Type A 10 Appeals Taxation
Docket 61 entries
Disposition judgment by stipulation before trial commenced

Parties

Plaintiff Brookside Commons Apartments, Llc|New Milford Affordable Housing, Inc.
Defendant Town Of New Milford
Photo of Hon. Hon Matthew Budzik

Judge

Hon. Hon Matthew Budzik

Connecticut

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGMENT BY STIPULATION BEFORE TRIAL COMMENCED RESULT: HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  2. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  3. RETURN OF SERVICE
  4. MOTION TO TRANSFER To Tax and Administrative Appeals Session Court in New Britain RESULT: Granted 7/27/2023 HON DAN SHABAN
  5. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/27/2023 HON DAN SHABAN
  6. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) 101.00 RESULT: Granted 7/27/2023 HON DAN SHABAN
  7. ORDER RESULT: Granted 7/27/2023 HON DAN SHABAN
  8. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RESULT: Granted 8/2/2023 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  9. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/2/2023 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  10. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Motion to Consolidate (103.00)
  11. TRANSFERRED FROM SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF DANBURY
  12. TRANSFERRED TO SUPERIOR COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW BRITAIN
  13. AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Appeal Complaint
  14. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/31/2023 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  15. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/31/2023 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  16. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (108.00)
  17. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) For Urgent Status Conference on 09-06-23 or 09-07-23 RESULT: Order 9/6/2023 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  18. ORDER RESULT: Order 9/6/2023 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  19. ANSWER (107.00)
  20. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF REQUEST FOR ADMISSION PB 13-22
  21. MOTION FOR ORDER Re: Objections to Pending Discovery
  22. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR ORDER
  23. WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION For Order (113.00)
  24. WITHDRAWAL OF OBJECTION 114.00 TO MOTION FOR ORDER 113.00
  25. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RESULT: Denied 4/3/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  26. ORDER RESULT: Denied 4/3/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  27. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND EXTEND DATE FOR FILING RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY RESULT: Granted 12/15/2023 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  28. ORDER RESULT: Granted 12/15/2023 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  29. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RE MOTION 128.00
  30. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) RE MOTION 118.00
  31. ANSWER AND/OR OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS PB 13-23(a)
  32. OBJECTION TO INTERROGATORIES/PRODUCTION PB 13-8 and 13-10 PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS
  33. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/11/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  34. ORDER RESULT: Granted 4/11/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  35. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) 123.00)
  36. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME To File Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment RESULT: Granted 8/15/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  37. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/15/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  38. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) 125.00
  39. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION For Summary Judgment (117.00)
  40. AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT of Assessor Brian Lastra, CCMA II (127.00)
  41. EXHIBITS to Affidavit of Brian Lastra in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (128.00)
  42. AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT of Laura Regan, Land Use Supervisor and ZEO (127.00)
  43. EXHIBITS to Affidavit of Laura Regan, Land Use Supervisor & ZEO (130.00)
  44. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/19/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  45. ORDER RESULT: Granted 9/19/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  46. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Re Motion 133.00
  47. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  48. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/4/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  49. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) for immediate action on motion 134.00
  50. CASEFLOW REQUEST (JD-CV-116) Rescheduling of Hearing Scheduled for 1/27/25 RESULT: Granted 11/5/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  51. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/5/2024 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  52. REPLY MEMORANDUM to Defendant's Objection & Memo of Law to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment
  53. REPLY MEMORANDUM APPENDICES W, X, Y (Affidavit in Support), and Z
  54. MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER BY CONSENT RESULT: Denied 6/23/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  55. ORDER RESULT: Denied 6/23/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  56. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS AND PROVISION OF APPRAISAL REPORT AS PER CGS Sec. 12-117a(a)(2)
  57. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS Michael Santoro, Connecticut DOH, Director of Office of Policy, Research and Housing
  58. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESS David Herbst, MAI
  59. NOTICE PURSUANT TO P.B. 13-4(b)(3)
  60. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION Joint Motion for Judgment and Stipulation for Judgment RESULT: Granted 11/12/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK
  61. ORDER RESULT: Granted 11/12/2025 HON MATTHEW BUDZIK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more