Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-05-15
Status INACTIVE
Type Foreclosure Marsh. Of Lien
Docket 55 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Amerihome Mortgage Company, Llc
Defendant Gage Young|Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Gage Young Aka Gage R. Young|Megan Zajaczkowski|Unknown Spouse, If Any, Of Megan Zajaczkowski Aka Megan C. Zajaczkowski
Photo of Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Judge

Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT, PRELIMINARY JUDICIAL REPORT, SERVICE REQUEST
  2. OTICE FILED BY P1 AMERIHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC ATTORNEY MICHAEL L WIERY 0068898 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  3. LAINTIFF HAS FURTHER UPDATED THE COURT. PLAINTIFF NOW HAS UNTIL 12/20/23 TO ONCE AGAIN UPDATE THE COURT OR DISMISS ITS CASE. FAILURE TO UPDATE THE COURT BY SAID DATE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY. NOTICE ISSUED
  4. OTICE FILED BY P1 AMERIHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC ATTORNEY MICHAEL L WIERY 0068898 LOSS MITIGATION STATUS
  5. LAINTIFF HAS FURTHER UPDATED THE COURT. PLAINTIFF NOW HAS UNTIL 11/20/23 TO ONCE AGAIN UPDATE THE COURT OR DISMISS ITS CASE. FAILURE TO UPDATE THE COURT BY SAID DATE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY. NOTICE ISSUED
  6. OTICE FILED BY P1 AMERIHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC ATTORNEY MICHAEL L WIERY 0068898 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF STATUS OF LOSS MITIGATION STATUS
  7. LAINTIFF HAS NOTIFIED THE COURT THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN OFFERED A RESOLUTION TO THE WITHIN CASE. PLAINTIFF NOW HAS UNTIL 11/6/23 TO FURTHER UPDATE THE COURT. FAILURE TO UPDATE THE COURT BY SAID DATE MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. OTICE FILED BY P1 AMERIHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC ATTORNEY MICHAEL L WIERY 0068898 LOSS MITIGATION STATUS
  9. REVIEW OF THE COURT DOCKET INDICATES SERVICE AND INACTIVITY ON THIS CASE. PLAINTIFF HAS UNTIL 10/11/23 TO NOTIFY THE COURT IN WRITING IF THE DEFENDANT IS CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED FOR LOSS MITIGATION OR HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR LOSS MITIGATION. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. NSWER FILED BY DEFENDANT(S) GAGE YOUNG(D1) and MEGAN ZAJACZKOWSKI(D3) ATTORNEY PETER COZMYK 0078862 ANSWER
  11. UMS COMPLAINT(50894862) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF MEGAN ZAJACZKOWSKI 7301 CRAIGMERE DRIVE MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130 ANSWER DATE: 07/14/2023
  12. UMS COMPLAINT(50894861) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: MEGAN ZAJACZKOWSKI 7301 CRAIGMERE DRIVE MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130 ANSWER DATE: 07/14/2023
  13. UMS COMPLAINT(50894860) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF GAGE YOUNG 7301 CRAIGMERE DRIVE MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130 ANSWER DATE: 07/14/2023
  14. UMS COMPLAINT(50894859) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: GAGE YOUNG 7301 CRAIGMERE DRIVE MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130 ANSWER DATE: 07/14/2023
  15. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  16. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  18. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. RIT FEE
  20. RIT FEE
  21. RIT FEE
  22. RIT FEE
  23. EQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED REQUEST FOR ORDINARY MAIL
  24. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50709975 RETURNED 6/12/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF MEGAN ZAJACZKOWSKI - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  25. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50709974 RETURNED 6/12/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT ZAJACZKOWSKI/MEGAN/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  26. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50709973 RETURNED 6/12/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF GAGE YOUNG - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  27. ERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 50709972 RETURNED 6/12/2023 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT YOUNG/GAGE/ - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  28. EFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED ON 5/24/23 IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS #1 GAGE YOUNG AND #3 MEGAN ZAJACZKOWSKI HAVE UNTIL 6/23/23 TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. NOTICE ISSUED
  29. UMS COMPLAINT(50709975) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF MEGAN ZAJACZKOWSKI 7301 CRAIGMERE DRIVE MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130
  30. UMS COMPLAINT(50709974) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: MEGAN ZAJACZKOWSKI 7301 CRAIGMERE DRIVE MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130
  31. UMS COMPLAINT(50709973) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: UNKNOWN SPOUSE, IF ANY, OF GAGE YOUNG 7301 CRAIGMERE DRIVE MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130
  32. UMS COMPLAINT(50709972) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: GAGE YOUNG 7301 CRAIGMERE DRIVE MIDDLEBURG HEIGHTS, OH 44130
  33. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  34. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  35. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  36. RIT FEE
  37. RIT FEE
  38. RIT FEE
  39. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  40. RIT FEE
  41. OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 05/25/2023 - GRANTED
  42. OTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED DEFENDANT(S) GAGE YOUNG(D1) and MEGAN ZAJACZKOWSKI(D3) PETER COZMYK 0078862. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
  43. LL NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FILE AND LOAN HISTORY IN QUESTION AND HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELIED UPON TO MAKE THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE AFFIDAVIT. ALL CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS FILED IN RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASES MUST INDICATE THAT THE AFFIANT HAS ACTUAL PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS' MILITARY STATUS. FAILURE TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVITS MAY RESULT IN MANDATORY PERSONAL ATTENDANCE OF AN AFFIANT FOR A HEARING, THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AND PENALTIES FOR PERJURY OR CONTEMPT, AND DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. BEFORE JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON ANY CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT IN A RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CASE, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND ANY OTHER PARTY THAT ASSERTS A CLAIM FOR FORECLOSURE OR MONEY JUDGMENT MUST FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OR AFFIDAVITS. IN REGARD TO NON-MILITARY CLIENT AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS REVIEWED THE FILE. 3) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE AND/OR MONEY JUDGMENT OR ITS SERVICER AND THAT THIS REPRESENTATIVE: HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS, OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE; HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE; AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE PLEADINGS AND COURT FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 4) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE REPRESENTATIVE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 3 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 5) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN SUPPORT OF THE CLAIMS FOR FORECLOSURE ARE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 6) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 7) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. IN REGARD TO CLIENT EXECUTED MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST: 1) IDENTIFY THE COUNSEL OF RECORD AND HIS OR HER LAW FIRM. 2) PROVIDE THAT THE COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS COMMUNICATED WITH THE AFFIANT OF THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT AND THAT THE AFFIANT HAS AFFIRMED THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED NECESSARY WEBSITE AND/OR DATABASE TO DETERMINE THE MILITARY STATUS OF THE APPROPRIATE DEFENDANTS. 3) PROVIDE THE FULL NAME OF THE AFFIANT DESCRIBED IN ITEM 2 AND THE DATE OR DATES OF THE COMMUNICATION. 4) CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD'S KNOWLEDGE, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE MILITARY AFFIDAVIT IS ACCURATE IN ALL RELEVANT RESPECTS. 5) ACKNOWLEDGE THAT COUNSEL OF RECORD HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT THE AFFIDAVIT IN LIGHT OF NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS FOLLOWING ITS FILING. 6) BE SIGNED AND DATED BY COUNSEL OF RECORD. FAILURE TO SUBMIT AN APPROPRIATE AFFIDAVIT ON OR BEFORE THE DATE OF TRIAL, THE DATE THAT A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS RIPE FOR RULING, OR THE DATE OF DEFAULT HEARING, WHICHEVER IS APPLICABLE, WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND MAY RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS. STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS ARE POSTED ON THE CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMONPLEAS WEBSITE HTTP://CP.CUYAHOGACOUNTY.US/INTERNET/COURTDOCS/MAGISTRATES/AFFIDAVIT (REV5).PDF. ALL AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER MUST BE IN THE FORMAT OF THESE STANDARDIZED AFFIDAVIT FORMS. IN LIEU OF THIS AFFIDAVIT: 1) IN CASES WHERE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, THE AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY REGARDING THOSE AFFIDAVITS. THE REPRESENTATIVE MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF MULTIPLE CLIENT AFFIDAVITS ARE FILED IN THE CASE AND ARE EXECUTED BY MORE THAN ONE AFFIANT, EACH AFFIANT MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER. 2) IN CASES WHERE NO CLIENT AFFIDAVITS HAVE BEEN FILED, AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST APPEAR AT THE HEARING OF THE MATTER AND TESTIFY IN SUPPORT OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT AND CONTENTS OF OTHER DOCUMENTS OR COURT FILINGS. THE OFFICER MUST APPEAR IN PERSON AND TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. 3) IN CASES WHERE NO HEARING IS SCHEDULED BEFORE THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (SUCH AS SOME SUMMARY JUDGMENT CASES), THE OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE MUST, CONTEMPORANEOUSLY WITH THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOVE TO SCHEDULE A HEARING AT WHICH THE AFFIANT MAY APPEAR. 4) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AFFIANTS OF MILITARY AFFIDAVITS, THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER WHO APPEARS IN COURT IN LIEU OF THE FILING OF A FORECLOSURE COUNSEL AFFIDAVIT MUST APPEAR WITH THE ORIGINAL PROMISSORY NOTE, INCLUDING ALL ENDORSEMENTS AND ALLONGES AND A CURRENT PAYMENT HISTORY FOR THE MORTGAGE LOAN AT ISSUE. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO TESTIFY THAT HE OR SHE HAS PERSONALLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS, RECORDS OR OTHER DATA RELATED TO THE CASE, HAS REVIEWED THE PLEADINGS AND OTHER COURT FILINGS IN THE CASE AND HAS CONFIRMED BOTH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE FILINGS AND THE ACCURACY OF THE NOTARIZATIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IF ANY. THE AFFIANT OR AN OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER MUST BE PREPARED TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONING OF THE MAGISTRATE OR JUDGE PRESIDING OVER THE HEARING AND THE QUESTIONING OF ANY OTHER PARTY ATTENDING THE HEARING. 5) IF THE AFFIANT OR OFFICER OF THE PARTY SEEKING FORECLOSURE OR AN OFFICER OF ITS SERVICER HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY DEPOSED AND HAS TESTIFIED UNDER OATH REGARDING THE ABOVE REQUIRED INFORMATION, THE FILING OF THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT DEPOSITION WILL SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS POLICY. FAILURE TO FILE AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT OR DO ANY OF THE ALTERNATIVES TO FILING AN ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT BEFORE THE CASE IS RIPE FOR THE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE CASE. NOTICE ISSUED
  44. AGISTRATE JOHN T DYKE ASSIGNED (MANUALLY)
  45. T IS ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT THIS CAUSE BE REFERRED TO THE COURT MAGISTRATE TO TRY THE ISSUES OF LAW AND FACT ARISING THEREIN AND REPORT WITHOUT UNNECESSARY DELAY. A PARTY SEEKING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MUST FILE A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ONCE A CASE IS SET FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, THE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE WITHDRAWN ONLY BY SEPARATE MOTION WITH GOOD CAUSE SHOWN. NOTICE ISSUED
  46. UDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM); RE-FILED CASE, REASSIGNED TO ORIGINAL JUDGE, JUDGE KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA
  47. UDGE NANCY MARGARET RUSSO ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  48. PECIAL PROJECTS FUND FEE
  49. EGAL RESEARCH
  50. EGAL NEWS
  51. EGAL AID
  52. OMPUTER FEE
  53. LERK'S FEE
  54. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG
  55. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DOUGLAS A. HAESSIG

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more