Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-07
Status FINALSEAL - FINAL/RECORD SEALED
Type Dh Dhs Juvenile Appeal
Docket 66 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Olson, Jennifer Oyler|Navrat, Samantha
Defendant Ar Dhs|Minor Children|Tave, Demarcus D|Mcclain, Dana K|Howard, Ellen Kathryn
Photo of Hon. N Mark Klappenbach

Judge

Hon. N Mark Klappenbach

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. APPELLATE COVERSHEET
  2. Appellate court coversheet.
  3. No Images
  4. RECORD LODGED
  5. E-filed record. Pleadings: 1 volume; 112 pages. Transcript: 1 volume; 317 pages. No physical exhibits. Entire record sealed pursuant to R. 6-9/6-10.
  6. No Images
  7. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  8. none.
  9. No Images
  10. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  11. Appellant's brief due August 6, 2022. Briefing notice sent to Jennifer Olson, Demcarcus Tave, Ellen Howard, and Dana McClain.
  12. No Images
  13. ACTIVE/RECORD SEALED
  14. Entire record sealed pursuant to R. 6-9/6-10.
  15. No Images
  16. 7 DAY BRIEF EXTENSION
  17. Appellant's brief is due August 13, 2022 after 7-day brief extension.
  18. No Images
  19. NO MERIT BRIEF FILED
  20. Appellant's No Merit Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  21. No Images
  22. MOT RELIEV AS COUNS NO MERIT
  23. Motion of Jennifer Oyler Olson to withdraw as counsel on appeal.
  24. No Images
  25. LETT TO APPLLNT 30 DAYS TO RES
  26. Motion of Jennifer Oyler Olson to withdraw as counsel on appeal, no-merit brief, and letter stating appellant's pro se points for reversal are due September 15, 2022 mailed to appellant's address of record.
  27. No Images
  28. LETT TO APPLLNT 30 DAYS TO RES
  29. Appellant's pro se points are due October 12, 2022. Appellant's address updated this date. The clerk's office mailed a letter with new pro se points due date, no-merit brief, and motion to the appellant's updated address.
  30. No Images
  31. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT
  32. Green card receipt for mailing signed and returned.
  33. No Images
  34. MAIL RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
  35. Packet mailed August 16, 2022 (first packet) returned. Second packet was delivered and signed for.
  36. No Images
  37. CASE SUBMITTED
  38. none.
  39. No Images
  40. MAJORITY OPINION
  41. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted. Abramson and Virden, JJ., agree.
  42. OPINION
  43. CLOSED/RECORD SEALED
  44. none.
  45. No Images
  46. CLERK NOTE
  47. Opinion mailed to Samantha Navrat 5804 Enid Street Fort Smith, AR 72903.
  48. No Images
  49. OPINION PANEL
  50. none.
  51. No Images
  52. MANDATE TO CLERK
  53. none.
  54. Mandate

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more