Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-19
Status Open
Type Petition Custody And Support
Docket 79 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ramirez, Sandra
Defendant Zambrano, Jose Hilario, Jr
Photo of Hon. Pebet Noelle

Judge

Hon. Pebet Noelle

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Appeared in Person
  2. Petition for Custody/Support
  3. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
  4. Income and Expense Declaration
  5. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
  6. Income and Expense Declaration
  7. Initial OSC/Motion - Re: Custody/Visitation & Child Support Comment HRG @ 1:15 PM in dept 304
  8. Proof of Service of Summons
  9. Response Comment Response to Petitioner for custody and support
  10. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
  11. Responsive Declaration Comment Responsive Declaration to request for order
  12. Initial OSC/Motion Judicial Officer Allen-Hill, Glenda Hearing Time 1:15 PM Result Heard Comment cc, cs - set by atty Boyd for petnr
  13. Judge Allen-Hill Minute Order. See attached.
  14. Appeared in Person
  15. FCS Session Set Comment Tier I
  16. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed
  17. Income and Expense Declaration
  18. Proof of Service by Mail
  19. FCS Tier 1 Mediation Original Type FCS Tier 1 Mediation Hearing Time 10:00 AM Result FCS Partial Agreement WITHOUT Legal Custody and/or Visitatio Parties Present Petitioner: Ramirez, Sandra Respondent: Zambrano, Jose Hilario, JR
  20. Return Readiness- Tier I Original Type Return Readiness- Tier I Judicial Officer Allen-Hill, Glenda Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  21. Judge Allen-Hill Minute Order. See attached.
  22. Appeared in Person
  23. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed
  24. Return Readiness- Tier I Original Type Return Readiness- Tier I Judicial Officer Allen-Hill, Glenda Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  25. Judge Allen-Hill Minute Order. See attached.
  26. Appeared in Person
  27. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed
  28. Income and Expense Declaration
  29. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Allen-Hill, Glenda Hearing Time 2:00 PM Result Continued Party's Motion
  30. Judge Allen-Hill Minute Order. See attached.
  31. Appeared in Person
  32. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  33. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment Minute Order
  34. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Allen-Hill, Glenda Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion
  35. Judge Allen-Hill Minute Order. See attached.
  36. Appeared in Person
  37. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment Minute Order
  38. Motion Child Support Original Type Motion Child Support Judicial Officer Allen-Hill, Glenda Hearing Time 2:00 PM Result Heard
  39. Judge Allen-Hill Minute Order. See attached.
  40. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment Minute Order
  41. Proposed Documents Comment Stipulations to Establish or Modify Child Support & Order
  42. Order Denied Comment Stip and Order RE: CS
  43. Substitution of Attorney Comment Old Atty: Laura Boyd New Atty: Brian N Folland
  44. Motion Modify Child Visitation
  45. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
  46. Income and Expense Declaration
  47. Proof of Service
  48. Responsive Declaration
  49. Income and Expense Declaration
  50. Proof of Service Comment Electronic Service
  51. Initial OSC/Motion Original Type Initial OSC/Motion Judicial Officer Lee, Charles Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued Court's Motion Comment CC, CV, CS set by Brian Folland
  52. FCS Session Set Comment Tier 1
  53. Appeared in Person
  54. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment of minute order dated
  55. FCS Tier 1 Mediation Original Type FCS Tier 1 Mediation Hearing Time 10:00 AM Result FCS Only One Parent Present Parties Present Petitioner: Ramirez, Sandra
  56. Return Readiness- Tier I Original Type Return Readiness- Tier I Judicial Officer Lee, Charles Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Heard
  57. FCS Session Set Comment Tier 1
  58. Appeared in Person
  59. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment of the Minute Order dated
  60. FCS Tier 1 Mediation Original Type FCS Tier 1 Mediation Hearing Time 1:00 PM Result FCS Partial Agreement WITHOUT Legal Custody and/or Visitatio Parties Present Petitioner: Ramirez, Sandra Respondent: Zambrano, Jose Hilario, JR
  61. Return Readiness- Tier I Original Type Return Readiness- Tier I Judicial Officer Lee, Charles Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued Court's Motion Comment CC, CV
  62. Appeared in Person
  63. Court orders Comment The matter is set for a contested hearing on September 16, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. and September 18, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 401. The parties are ordered to comply with Local Rule 5.8. Materials submitted pursuant to Local Rule 5.8 shall be filed and served no later than 10 days prior to the contested hearing.
  64. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed
  65. Trial brief filed
  66. Contested Hearing Original Type Contested Hearing Judicial Officer Lee, Charles Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Heard
  67. Appeared in Person
  68. Minute Order Corrected/Amended Comment Corrected/Amended: attachment of DissoMaster
  69. Contested Hearing Judicial Officer Lee, Charles Hearing Time 1:30 PM Cancel Reason Settled
  70. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment mo corrected minute order
  71. Proposed Documents Comment OAH DEPT 401
  72. Order after Hearing Comment
  73. Withdraw of Attorney Comment Tim Jolly
  74. Withdraw of Attorney Comment Old atty: Folland New atty: Proper
  75. Notice Regarding Payment of Support - DCSS Added Comment Substituted Payee:Fresno County Department of Child Support Services
  76. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Parties Served: Jose Hilario Zambrano JR, Sandra Judith Avalos; Service by Mail; .
  77. Notice of Motion Comment Health Care / HRG: @ 8AM Dept 302
  78. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Jose Hilario Zambrano JR, Sandra Judith Avalos. Mailed on
  79. Motion - Health Care Original Type Motion - Health Care Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Parties Present Petitioner: Ramirez, Sandra

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more