Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-09
Status Closed
Type Guardianship Person Only
Docket 43 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Hernandez Perez, Maria Isabel
Photo of Hon. Cardoza, Jane A

Judge

Hon. Cardoza, Jane A

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Termination - Operation of law Comment Minor has reached the age of 21.
  2. Petition for Appointment of Temporary Guardian
  3. Confidential Guardian Screening Form
  4. Dec. Under Uniform Child Custody & Jurisdict & Enforce Act
  5. Duties of Guardian
  6. Petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings
  7. Order Granting Waiver of Court Fees and Cost Signed Comment cc mailed
  8. Order (Generic) Judicial Officer Arax, Brian M Comment Ex Parte Order on Petition for Appointment of Temporary Guardian THE COURT FINDS: Facts stated are INSUFFICIENT to support appointment of a temporary guardian ex parte. THE COURT ORDERS: Temporary Petition is DENIED cc emailed/mailed atty
  9. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Order on Court Fee Waiver filed ) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on (2/14/23) . Parties served: (Marial Isabel Hernandez Perez, George Rios ) 2/14/23sx
  10. Notice of Hearing Comment Date: Time: 9am Dept: 303
  11. Confidential Supplemental Court Investigation Report Comment Fees Waived
  12. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Comment of CI Report
  13. Petition - Appoint Guardian Original Type Petition - Appoint Guardian Judicial Officer Arax, Brian M Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Heard Comment Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person (Initial)
  14. Petition Judicial Officer Arax, Brian M Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Heard Comment Petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings
  15. Appeared in Person
  16. Minute Order Attachment Comment B
  17. Minute Order Attachment Comment A
  18. Request Filed Comment Request for Continuance
  19. Continued Hearing by Court Original Type Continued Hearing by Court Judicial Officer Arax, Brian M Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Heard Comment Petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings Continuance requested old Hrg Date New Hrg Date 12/14/2023
  20. Continued Hearing by Court Original Type Continued Hearing by Court Judicial Officer Arax, Brian M Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Heard Comment Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person (Initial) Continuance requested old Hrg Date New Hrg Date 12/14/2023
  21. Minute Order Attachment Comment B
  22. Minute Order Attachment Comment A
  23. Petition Original Type Petition Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Heard Comment Petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings
  24. Petition - Appoint Guardian Original Type Petition - Appoint Guardian Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Heard Comment Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person
  25. Minute Order Attachment
  26. Minute Order Attachment
  27. Appeared in Person
  28. Notice of Hearing Comment Date: Time: 9:00a.m. Dept: 97A
  29. Declaration of Due Diligence Comment Declaration of Due Diligence
  30. Continued Hearing by Court Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Heard Comment Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person
  31. Continued Hearing by Court Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Heard Comment Petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings
  32. Minute Order Attachment Comment A
  33. Appeared in Person
  34. Minute Order Attachment Comment B
  35. Continued Hearing by Court Original Type Continued Hearing by Court Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Granted Comment Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person
  36. Continued Hearing by Court Original Type Continued Hearing by Court Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane Hearing Time 9:00 AM Result Granted Comment Petition for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings
  37. Minute Order Attachment Comment A
  38. Appeared in Person
  39. Minute Order Attachment Comment B
  40. Document filed Comment Order Appointing Guardian
  41. Order Appointing Guardian Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane Comment cc emailed
  42. Order Re Eligibility for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status Judicial Officer Cardoza, Jane Comment cc emailed
  43. Letters of Guardianship Comment cc emailed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more