Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-27
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort Miscellaneous
Docket 58 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rudyak Electrical Services Llc
Defendant Fiorella Construction Co. C/o Statutory Agent Mcneal Shick Archibald And Bill Compnay, Lpa|New Concept Security Inc|Alexander Gurary
Photo of Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Judge

Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. REFUND BALANCE OF CASE COST DEPOSIT TO DANIEL L. JACOBS JR. LLC
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54218883) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DANIEL L. JACOBS [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54218882) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: BRIAN T WINCHESTER [email protected]
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY(54218881) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: WILLIAM A CARLIN [email protected]
  6. CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. O.S.J. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO BOTH PARTIES. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S) AND PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. NOTICE FILED BY P1 RUDYAK ELECTRICAL SERVICES LLC ATTORNEY DANIEL L. JACOBS 0091254 JOINT DISMISSAL
  8. MOTION TO DISMISS FILED THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT FIORILLI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT 07/15/2024 - UNKNOWN
  9. USPS RECEIPT NO. 53458782 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/01/2024 FIORELLA CONSTRUCTION CO. PROCESSED BY COC 05/08/2024.
  10. SUMS 3RD PTY COMPLNT(53458782) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: FIORELLA CONSTRUCTION CO. 4608 ST. CLAIR AVENUE CLEVELAND, OH 44103-0000
  11. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  12. WRIT FEE
  13. PRAECIPE FILED PRAECIPE
  14. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WILLIAM A CARLIN
  15. ANSWER AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIM $150 ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT OF NEW CONCEPT SECURITY INC. AND ALEXANDER GURARY
  16. USPS RECEIPT NO. 53271652 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/18/2024 GURARY/ALEXANDER/ PROCESSED BY COC 03/27/2024.
  17. USPS RECEIPT NO. 53271651 DELIVERED BY USPS 03/18/2024 NEW CONCEPT SECURITY INC PROCESSED BY COC 03/27/2024.
  18. SUMS CROSS-COMPLNT(53271652) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ALEXANDER GURARY 1491 MAPLEGROVE RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  19. SUMS CROSS-COMPLNT(53271651) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NEW CONCEPT SECURITY INC 1491 MAPLEGROVE RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  20. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  21. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  22. WRIT FEE
  23. WRIT FEE
  24. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
  25. CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT NO. 53077336 RETURNED 3/9/2024 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT NEW CONCEPT SECURITY INC - UNCLAIMED NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY
  26. ANSWER FILED BY P1 RUDYAK ELECTRICAL SERVICES LLC ATTORNEY DANIEL L. JACOBS 0091254 ANSWER TO AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM
  27. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WILLIAM A CARLIN
  28. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM $75 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIM
  29. SUMS AMENDED COMPLNT(53077336) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NEW CONCEPT SECURITY INC 1491 MAPLEGROVE RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  30. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  31. WRIT FEE
  32. REQUEST FOR SERVICE FILED INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE OF AMENDED COMPLAINT
  33. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DANIEL L. JACOBS
  34. AMENDED COMPLAINT $75 AMENDED COMPLAINT
  35. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 12/12/2023 IS CONTINUED AND WILL BE RESCHEDULED IMMINENTLY UPON THE ADDITION OF ALL PARTIES. NOTICE ISSUED
  36. REPLY TO COUNTERCLAIM FILED P1 RUDYAK ELECTRICAL SERVICES LLC, ATTORNEY DANIEL L. JACOBS 0091254 ANSWER
  37. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID WILLIAM A CARLIN
  38. ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM $75 ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM OF DEFENDANT NEW CONCEPT SECURITY, INC. AND ALEXANDER GURARY TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  39. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, FILED DEFENDANT(S) NEW CONCEPT SECURITY INC(D1) and ALEXANDER GURARY(D2) WILLIAM A CARLIN 0009144. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF WILLIAM CARLIN
  40. DOCKET HAS BEEN STRICKEN BY ORDER OF THE COURT (DOCKET 155968920 08/18/2023 AN)
  41. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 10/19/2023 IS CONTINUED TO 11/15/2023 AT 10:00 A.M. IN ORDER TO PERMIT DEFENDANT(S) TO RETAIN COUNSEL. THE FAILURE OF DEFENDANT NEW CONCEPT SECURITY, INC. TO RETAIN COUNSEL WILL RESULT IN IT BEING TREATED AS AN UNREPRESENTED PARTY. DEFENDANT NEW CONCEPT SECURITY, INC.'S ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT IS HEREBY STRICKEN AS DEFENDANT GURARY ENGAGED IN THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW. R.C. 4705.01. NOTICE ISSUED
  42. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 10/19/2023 AT 10:00 A.M. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT IN PERSON. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, PLEASE FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT. DO NOT CALL THE COURT. DATES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED FOR CONTINUANCE UNLESS A MOTION HAS BEEN DOCKETED AND HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  43. USPS RECEIPT NO. 51228656 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/01/2023 GURARY/ALEXANDER/ PROCESSED BY COC 08/09/2023.
  44. USPS RECEIPT NO. 51228655 DELIVERED BY USPS 08/01/2023 NEW CONCEPT SECURITY INC PROCESSED BY COC 08/09/2023.
  45. SUMS COMPLAINT(51228656) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: ALEXANDER GURARY 1491 MAPLEGROVE RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  46. SUMS COMPLAINT(51228655) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: NEW CONCEPT SECURITY INC 1491 MAPLEGROVE RD SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
  47. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  48. WRIT FEE
  49. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  50. WRIT FEE
  51. JUDGE JOHN D SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM) - VOIDED. DUE TO RECUSAL ON CASE NO. CV22967339 AND PURSUANT TO COURT POLICY, CASE NO. CV23983039 IS REASSIGNED TO JUDGE KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA (MANUAL).
  52. LEGAL RESEARCH
  53. LEGAL NEWS
  54. LEGAL AID
  55. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  56. COMPUTER FEE
  57. CLERK'S FEE
  58. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID DANIEL L. JACOBS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more