Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- INAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - Recorded (OR.8892.1935 / 2022112821)
- INAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
- ASE CLOSED
- OINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
- OTICE OF CANCELLATION OF MOTION CALENDAR HEARING
- OTICE OF SETTLEMENT
- OTICE OF SETTLEMENT
- OTICE OF MOTION CALENDAR HEARING
- PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT’S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE
- PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
- EFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL APPRAISAL AND ABATE THE INSTANT LAWSUIT PENDING COMPLETION OF APPRAISAL
- EFENDANTS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- OTICE OF SERVING DEFENDANTS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
- EFENDANT'S ATTORNEY: BETAR, PATRICK ASSIGNED
- DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
- DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
- MENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
- EFENDANTS SECOND AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT
- ECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF ZOOM HEARING
- IVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
- MENDED NOTICE OF ZOOM HEARING
- OTICE OFZOOM HEARING
- NITIAL CASE MANGEMENT ORDER-GENERAL
- EFENDANTS AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT
- EFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING DISPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
- EFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
- OTICE OF E-MAIL DESIGNATION PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 2.516
- OTICE OF APPEARANCE
- AYMENT $10.00 RECEIPT #2021095529
- [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
- IRST COLLECTIONS NOTICE SENT
- RDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
- UMMONS ISSUED
- AYMENT $400.00 RECEIPT #2021091566
- LAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING INITIAL INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
- LAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT
- LAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
- ROPOSED SUMMONS
- OTICE OF DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES IN COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 2.516
- OMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
- IVIL COVER SHEET
- LAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: MANZANILLA, LEO ASSIGNED
- ERGOSH, GARY L: ASSIGNED
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In