Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-12-27
Status Open
Type Construction Surety Bond, G.l. C. 149, §§ 29, 29 A
Docket 23 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ene Systems Inc
Defendant D D S Industries Inc|Suffolk Constructiion Company Inc|Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland|Zurich American Insurance Company|Liberty Mutual Insurance Company|Federal Insurance Company

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. arty(s) file Stipulation of Dismissal (filed 1/31/24) as to plaintiff v defendant with prejudice and with all rights of appeal waived. JUDGMENT entered on docket pursuant to Mass R Civ P 58(a) as amended and notice sent to parties pursuant to Mass R Civ P 77(d) Applies To: ENE Systems Inc (Plaintiff); D D S Industries Inc (Defendant); Suffolk Constructiion Company Inc (Defendant); Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Defendant); Zurich American Insurance Company (Defendant); Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Defendant); Federal Insurance Company (Defendant)
  2. ase assigned to: DCM Track A - Average was added on 12/27/2022
  3. riginal civil complaint filed.
  4. ivil action cover sheet filed.
  5. ervice Returned for Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company: Service via certified mail;
  6. ervice Returned for Defendant Suffolk Constructiion Company Inc: Service through person in charge / agent;
  7. ervice Returned for Defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland: Service via certified mail;
  8. ervice Returned for Defendant Feeral Insurance Company: Service via certified mail;
  9. ervice Returned for Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company: Service through person in charge / agent;
  10. mended: First amended complaint filed by ENE Systems Inc
  11. ervice Returned for Defendant Federal Insurance Company: Service accepted by counsel;
  12. ervice Returned for Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company: Service accepted by counsel;
  13. ervice Returned for Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company: Service accepted by counsel;
  14. ervice Returned for Defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland: Service accepted by counsel;
  15. ervice Returned for Defendant Suffolk Constructiion Company Inc: Service accepted by counsel;
  16. ttorney appearance On this date Joel Lewin, Esq. added for Defendant Federal Insurance Company
  17. ttorney appearance On this date Joel Lewin, Esq. added for Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
  18. ttorney appearance On this date Joel Lewin, Esq. added for Defendant Zurich American Insurance Company
  19. ttorney appearance On this date Joel Lewin, Esq. added for Defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
  20. ttorney appearance On this date Joel Lewin, Esq. added for Defendant Suffolk Constructiion Company Inc
  21. nswer to amended complaint Applies To: D D S Industries Inc (Defendant)
  22. ttorney appearance On this date Christopher Strang, Esq. added for Defendant D D S Industries Inc
  23. ervice Returned for Applies To: D D S Industries Inc (Defendant)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more