Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-25
Status Closed
Type Worker's Compensation
Docket 187 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Jean Marie, Wilbertiny
Defendant Spectral Sciences Inc|Charles River Analytics Inc|Tagup Inc|Google Inc|Jp Morgan Chase|Bank Of America|Walmart|Capitol One|Amazon|Apple|Fedex|Ups|Disney|Nike|Nvidia|Netflix|Commonwealth Of Massachusetts (as Amended)|Microsoft Corporation (as Amended)

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. JUDGMENT on Defendants, Spectral Sciences Inc, Charles River Analytics Inc, Tagup Inc, Google Inc, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Walmart, Capitol One, Amazon, Apple, Fedex, UPS, Disney, Nike, Nvidia, Netflix, Commonwealth of Massachusetts (as amended), Microsoft Corporation (as amended) 12(b) motion to dismiss against Plaintiff(s) Wilbertiny Jean-Marie. It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Shall be ALLOWED. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without costs. JUDGMENT entered on this date pursuant to the provisions of Mass. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and notice sent to parties pursuant to Mass. R. Civ. P. 77(d).
  2. Case assigned to: DCM Track X - Accelerated was added on 10/25/2022
  3. Original civil complaint filed.
  4. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  5. Docket Note: Four summonses in hand
  6. Plaintiff Wilbertiny Jean-Marie's Motion to Amend the Complaint
  7. Amended: amended complaint filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  8. Civil action cover sheet filed. AMENDED
  9. Plaintiff Wilbertiny Jean-Marie's Motion to Amend
  10. Endorsement on Motion to Amend the Complaint (#3.0): ALLOWED Motion to amend is permitted as of right. Plaintiff to file Amended Complaint within 20 days (dated 11/9/22) notice sent 11/15/22
  11. Attorney appearance electronically filed On this date Gina Fleury, Esq. added for Defendant Charles River Analytics Inc
  12. Attorney appearance electronically filed On this date Courtney A Longo, Esq. added for Defendant Charles River Analytics Inc
  13. Defendant Charles River Analytics Inc's EMERGENCY Motion to extend time for response to the complaint
  14. Amended: amended complaint filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  15. Endorsement on Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint (#7.0): No Action Taken No action taken. See endorsement on paper #6. (11/21/22) (Notice sent 11/25/22)
  16. Endorsement on Motion to Amend (#6.0): ALLOWED No answer having been filed and no prejudice ALLOWED. Second Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed as of today's date. Defendants shall respond to that Complaint under the rules. 11/21/22. Notice Sent 11/25/22. Judge: Squires-Lee, Hon. Debra A
  17. Endorsement on Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint. (#7.0): No Action Taken See endorsement on paper #6. 11/21/22. Notice Sent 11/25/22.
  18. Civil action cover sheet filed. (amended)
  19. Plaintiff Wilbertiny Jean-Marie's Submission of Facts
  20. Amended: Second Amended Complaint amended complaint filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie 11/21/22. Judge: Squires-Lee, Hon. Debra A
  21. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  22. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  23. Defendant Spectral Sciences Inc's Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  24. Defendant Charles River Analytics Inc's Notice of filing motion to dismiss
  25. Service Returned for Defendant Charles River Analytics Inc: Service through person in charge / agent;
  26. Service Returned for Defendant Spectral Sciences Inc: Service through person in charge / agent;
  27. Service Returned for Defendant Nvidia: Service through person in charge / agent;
  28. Attorney appearance On this date Thomas Christopher Donnelly, Esq. added for Defendant Nvidia
  29. Attorney appearance On this date Michelle Pascucci, Esq. added for Defendant Nvidia
  30. Plaintiff Wilbertiny Jean-Marie's Motion for Return of All filing Fees
  31. Defendant Capitol One's Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  32. Corporate Disclosure Statement Applies To: Capitol One (Defendant)
  33. Defendant Nvidia's Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  34. Defendant Nvidia's Statement of Corporate Disclosure
  35. Attorney appearance electronically filed. On this date Jasmine N Brown, Esq. added for Defendant Disney
  36. Attorney appearance electronically filed. On this date Michael P Boudett, Esq. added for Defendant Disney
  37. Defendant Spectral Sciences Inc's Submission of Corporate Disclosure Statement
  38. Defendant Disney's Notice of Intent to file Motion to Dismiss
  39. Defendant Disney's Submission of Corporate Disclosure Statement
  40. Service Returned for Defendant Disney: Service through person in charge / agent;
  41. Service Returned for Defendant Capitol One: Service through person in charge / agent;
  42. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  43. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  44. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  45. Defendant Amazon's Submission of Superior Court Rule 9E Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  46. Defendant Capitol One's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State A Claim on Which Relief can be Granted
  47. Capitol One's Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can Be Granted
  48. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  49. Defendant Capitol One's Notice of Filing and Document List
  50. Attorney appearance On this date Patrick M Curran, Jr., Esq. added for Defendant Capitol One
  51. Attorney appearance On this date Olivia Vehslage, Esq. added for Defendant Capitol One
  52. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 12/16/2022 11:41:28
  53. Service Returned for Defendant UPS: Service through person in charge / agent;
  54. Service Returned for Defendant Amazon: Service through person in charge / agent;
  55. Service Returned for Defendant Tagup Inc: Service through person in charge / agent;
  56. Service Returned for Defendant Walmart: Service through person in charge / agent;
  57. Service Returned for Defendant Nike: Service through person in charge / agent;
  58. Service Returned for Defendant Netflix: Service through person in charge / agent;
  59. Service Returned for Defendant Fedex: Service through person in charge / agent;
  60. Service Returned for Defendant Bank of America: Service through person in charge / agent;
  61. Service Returned for Defendant Apple: Service through person in charge / agent;
  62. Service Returned for Defendant Charles River Analytics Inc: Service through person in charge / agent;
  63. Service Returned for Defendant Commonwealth of Massachusetts (as amended): Service through person in charge / agent;
  64. Service Returned for Defendant Google Inc: Service through person in charge / agent;
  65. Service Returned for Defendant JP Morgan Chase: Service through person in charge / agent;
  66. Defendant Spectral Sciences Inc's Motion to dismiss The Second Amended Complaint.
  67. Spectral Sciences Inc's Memorandum in support of Its Motion to dismiss The Second Amended Complaint.
  68. Opposition to Defendant Spectral Sciences Inc's Motion to dismiss The Second Amended Complaint. filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  69. Certificate of Compliance Superior Court Rule 9C
  70. Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A Applies To: Held, Esq., Alexandra F (Attorney) on behalf of Spectral Sciences Inc (Defendant)
  71. Rule 9A notice of filing Applies To: Held, Esq., Alexandra F (Attorney) on behalf of Spectral Sciences Inc (Defendant)
  72. Rule 9A list of documents filed. Applies To: Held, Esq., Alexandra F (Attorney) on behalf of Spectral Sciences Inc (Defendant)
  73. Defendant Disney's Notice of Filing
  74. Defendant Disney's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint
  75. Disney's Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint
  76. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  77. Disney's Reply Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint
  78. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 12/22/2022 14:45:48
  79. Defendant Nvidia's Motion to Dismiss
  80. Nvidia's Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice
  81. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  82. Nvidia's Reply Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice
  83. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  84. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  85. Defendant Netflix's Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  86. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  87. Defendant Walmart's Submission of Corporate Disclosure Statement
  88. Defendant Walmart's Notice of Service of Motion to Dismiss
  89. Event Result:: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 02/07/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: By Court prior to date Hon. Robert B Gordon, Presiding
  90. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 12/23/2022 11:50:20
  91. Attorney appearance electronically filed. Applies To: Silveira, Esq., Alison H (Attorney) on behalf of Bank of America (Defendant)
  92. Defendant Bank of America's Assented to Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
  93. Defendant Charles River Analytics Inc's Motion to dismiss all counts
  94. Charles River Analytics Inc's Memorandum in support of motion to dismiss
  95. Opposition to motion to dismiss filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  96. Reply/Sur-reply in further support of motion to dismiss Applies To: Charles River Analytics Inc (Defendant)
  97. 9A Affidavit
  98. 9C Certification
  99. Notice of Filing
  100. 9A List of Documents
  101. Attorney appearance On this date Edwin Clark Pease, Esq. added for Defendant Tagup Inc
  102. Attorney appearance On this date Delaney M Busch, Esq. added for Defendant Tagup Inc
  103. Defendant Tagup Inc's Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  104. Corporate Disclosure Statement filed Applies To: Tagup Inc (Defendant)
  105. Attorney appearance On this date Erika D Cagney, Esq. added for Defendant Google Inc
  106. Defendant Google Inc's Notice for Motion to Dismiss
  107. Attorney appearance electronically filed. On this date Gareth W Notis, Esq. added for Defendant Fedex
  108. Attorney appearance electronically filed. On this date Stephen Troiano, Esq. added for Defendant Fedex
  109. Defendant Fedex's Submission of Corporate Disclosure Statement
  110. Defendant Fedex's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint
  111. Defendant Amazon's Submission of Corporate Disclosure Statement
  112. Defendant Netflix's Submission of Corporate Disclosure Statement
  113. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 12/30/2022 13:07:22
  114. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 12/30/2022 14:40:28
  115. Defendant JP Morgan Chase's Motion to extend time to respond to complaint
  116. Attorney appearance electronically filed. On this date Jonathan M Albano, Esq. added for Defendant JP Morgan Chase
  117. Endorsement on Motion for extension of time respond to plaintiff's complaint (#49.0): ALLOWED dated (12/30/2022) notice sent (1/3/2023)
  118. Endorsement on Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (#56.0): ALLOWED Allowed. FedEx's deadline to respond to Complaint extended to Jan. 12, 2023. 12/30/23 Notice Sent 1/3/23 Judge: Squires-Lee, Hon. Debra A
  119. Defendant Google Inc's Submission of Corporate Disclosure Statement
  120. Attorney appearance On this date J. LaPointe, Esq. added for Defendant Google Inc
  121. Endorsement on Motion to extend time to respond to complaint (#57.0): ALLOWED answer or other responsive pleading to be filed no later than Jan. 13, 2023. (dated 1/04/23) notice sent 1/05/23 Applies To: JP Morgan Chase (Defendant)
  122. Defendant Tagup Inc's Motion to Dismiss
  123. Tagup Inc's Memorandum in support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint
  124. Opposition to Tagup Inc. filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  125. Tagup Inc's Reply Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint
  126. Plaintiff Wilbertiny Jean-Marie's Motion to Extend time Until Plaintiff has Legal Representation.
  127. Event Result:: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 03/14/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: By Court prior to date Hon. Robert B Gordon, Presiding Staff: Paul Kenneally, Assistant Clerk Michael O'Loughlin, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  128. Event Result:: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 03/14/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: By Court prior to date Hon. Robert B Gordon, Presiding Staff: Paul Kenneally, Assistant Clerk Michael O'Loughlin, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  129. Event Result:: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 03/14/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Rescheduled For the following reason: By Court prior to date Hon. Robert B Gordon, Presiding Staff: Paul Kenneally, Assistant Clerk Michael O'Loughlin, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  130. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 01/10/2023 16:03:25
  131. Attorney appearance On this date Brendan F Sullivan, Esq. added for Defendant UPS
  132. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  133. Defendant UPS's Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  134. Corporate Disclosure Statement filed Applies To: UPS (Defendant)
  135. Attorney appearance On this date Keri L Engelman, Esq. added for Defendant JP Morgan Chase
  136. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  137. Defendant JP Morgan Chase's Motion to Extend Time to Respond to complaint
  138. Endorsement on Motion for extension of time (#63.0): Other action taken in an abundance of consideration in the plaintiff's circumstances, the clerk is directed to continue the consolidated motions to dismiss hearing by 30 days there will be no further extension. if no attorney has entered an appearance for the plaintiff by the date, Mr. wilbertiny will have to appear pro se or have dismissal of the action. dated (1/10/23) notice sent (1/11/12)
  139. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  140. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  141. Endorsement on Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. (#65.0): ALLOWED Allowed without opposition. Dated 1/13/23 Notice sent 1/18/23
  142. Amended: amended complaint filed by Wilbertiny Jean-Marie
  143. Service Returned for Defendant Microsoft Corporation (as amended): Service through person in charge / agent;
  144. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  145. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  146. Defendant Apple's Notice of Motion to Dismiss
  147. Event Result:: Hearing (ADR) scheduled on: 02/06/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Held as Scheduled Hon. Robert B Gordon, Presiding Staff: Paul Kenneally, Assistant Clerk Michael O'Loughlin, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  148. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/06/2023 15:29:05
  149. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/06/2023 15:30:57
  150. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/06/2023 15:33:48
  151. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/06/2023 15:35:56
  152. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/06/2023 15:37:52
  153. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/06/2023 16:16:54
  154. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/07/2023 09:38:24
  155. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/07/2023 09:40:26
  156. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 02/07/2023 09:42:51
  157. Defendant JP Morgan Chase, UPS, Amazon, Netflix, Amazon, Fedex, Walmart, Bank of America, Commonwealth of Massachusetts (as amended), Google Inc's Motion to Extend Time to File Consolidated Motion to Dismiss
  158. Opposition to Plaintiff's Implied Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by Nvidia Applies To: Charles River Analytics Inc (Defendant); Tagup Inc (Defendant); Google Inc (Defendant); JP Morgan Chase (Defendant); Bank of America (Defendant); Walmart (Defendant); Capitol One (Defendant); Amazon (Defendant); Fedex (Defendant); UPS (Defendant); Disney (Defendant); Nvidia (Defendant); Netflix (Defendant); Commonwealth of Massachusetts (as amended) (Defendant)
  159. Defendants Nvidia's EMERGENCY Motion for Order that plaintiff file no further complaints pending resolution of all previously filed motions to dismiss and the consolidated motion to dismiss Applies To: Charles River Analytics Inc (Defendant); Tagup Inc (Defendant); Google Inc (Defendant); JP Morgan Chase (Defendant); Bank of America (Defendant); Walmart (Defendant); Capitol One (Defendant); Amazon (Defendant); Fedex (Defendant); UPS (Defendant); Disney (Defendant); Nvidia (Defendant); Netflix (Defendant); Commonwealth of Massachusetts (as amended) (Defendant)
  160. Defendant Microsoft Corporation (as amended)'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can be Granted
  161. Microsoft Corporation (as amended)'s Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief can be Granted
  162. Attorney appearance On this date Lisa Ann Stephanian Burton, Esq. added for Defendant Microsoft Corporation (as amended)
  163. Event Result:: Conference to Review Status scheduled on: 02/16/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Held via Video/Teleconference Hon. Robert B Gordon, Presiding Staff: Paul Kenneally, Assistant Clerk Michael O'Loughlin, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  164. Defendant Charles River Analytics Inc's Motion to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss
  165. Defendant Capitol One's Notice of Withdrawal of its Motion to Dismiss
  166. Endorsement on Motion to Extend Time to File Consolidated Motion to Dismiss (#67.0): ALLOWED Allowed, provided that all Defendants join in a single Motion to Dismiss. If there are compelling reasons why this cannot be done, they can be raised at the forthcoming status conference. 2/14/23. Notice Sent 2/17/23 Judge: Gordon, Hon. Robert B
  167. Defendant Nvidia's Motion to dismiss
  168. Defendant Tagup Inc's Motion to dismiss
  169. Defendant Spectral Sciences Inc's Certificate to Dismiss
  170. Defendant Disney's Motion to dismiss
  171. Defendant Microsoft Corporation (as amended)'s Motion to withdraw its Motion to Dismiss
  172. Endorsement on Motion to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss (#72.0): ALLOWED 2/21/23. Notice Sent 2/23/23 Judge: Gordon, Hon. Robert B
  173. Endorsement on Motion to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss (#75.0): ALLOWED (dated 2/22/23) notice sent 2/24/23
  174. Endorsement on Motion to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss (#76.0): ALLOWED (dated 2/22/23)
  175. Endorsement on Motion to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss (#77.0): ALLOWED (dated 2/22/23) notice sent 2/24/23
  176. Defendant Apple's Notice of Motion to Dismiss Applies To: Spectral Sciences Inc (Defendant); Charles River Analytics Inc (Defendant); Tagup Inc (Defendant); Google Inc (Defendant); JP Morgan Chase (Defendant); Bank of America (Defendant); Walmart (Defendant); Capitol One (Defendant); Amazon (Defendant); Apple (Defendant); Fedex (Defendant); UPS (Defendant); Disney (Defendant); Nvidia (Defendant); Netflix (Defendant); Commonwealth of Massachusetts (as amended) (Defendant); Microsoft Corporation (as amended) (Defendant)
  177. Endorsement on Motion to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss (#78.0): ALLOWED (dated 2/23/23) notice sent 2/27/23
  178. Defendants' Notice of Filing
  179. Google LLC's Rule 9A Affidavit
  180. Defendants Google Inc's Motion to dismiss (consolidated motion of defendants').
  181. Google Inc's Memorandum in support of motion to dismiss
  182. The following form was generated: Notice to Appear Sent On: 03/22/2023 15:02:34
  183. Attorney appearance electronically filed. On this date Yeatyng Evelyn Tang, Esq. added for Defendant Commonwealth of Massachusetts (as amended)
  184. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  185. Attorney appearance electronically filed.
  186. Event Result:: Rule 12 Hearing scheduled on: 04/14/2023 02:00 PM Has been: Held via Video/Teleconference Hon. Robert B Gordon, Presiding Staff: Michael O'Loughlin, Assistant Clerk Magistrate
  187. MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Memorandum of Decision and Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint shall be ALLOWED. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without costs. See paper #81 for full order. (Dated 4/18/23) (Notice sent 4/19/23) Judge: Gordon, Hon. Robert B

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more