Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-04-12
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort Product Liability
Docket 29 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Guilherme Attizzani Md
Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation Dba Costco Wholesale C/o Statutory Agent Ct Corporation System|Dover Corporation United States Corporation Company|Hillphoenix Inc. Dba Hillphoenix|Joe Doe, Inc|John Doe, Inc.
Photo of Hon. NANCY A FUERST

Judge

Hon. NANCY A FUERST

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. SPS RECEIPT NO. 47251157 DELIVERED BY USPS 05/11/2022 DOVER CORPORATION PROCESSED BY COC 05/18/2022.
  3. EGULAR MAIL SERVICE RECEIPT NO. 47398378 RETURNED 05/12/2022 FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DOVER CORPORATION NOT DELIVRBL AS ADDR NOTICE MAILED TO PLTFS ATTORNEY. $0.00
  4. UDGMENT ENTRY(47398379) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: HILLPHOENIX INC. 2016 GEES MILL ROAD. N.E. CONYERS, GA 30013
  5. UDGMENT ENTRY(47398378) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: DOVER CORPORATION 50 WEST BROAD STREET COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  6. SPS RECEIPT NO. 47251158 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/18/2022 HILLPHOENIX INC. PROCESSED BY COC 04/29/2022.
  7. SPS RECEIPT NO. 47251156 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/19/2022 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION PROCESSED BY COC 04/29/2022.
  8. UDGMENT ENTRY(47398377) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DENNIS R FOGARTY [email protected]
  9. UDGMENT ENTRY(47398376) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: DENNIS R FOGARTY [email protected]
  10. UDGMENT ENTRY(47398375) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: CHARLES V LONGO [email protected]
  11. OTICE OF REMOVAL TO U.S. DISTRICT COURT FILED 04/27/2022, U.S. DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 1:22-CV-00679. CASE TRANSFERRED TO U.S. DISTRICT COURT. FINAL. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. OTICE FILED BY D1 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION ATTORNEY DENNIS R FOGARTY 0055563 DEFENDANT COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
  13. UMS COMPLAINT(47251158) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: HILLPHOENIX INC. 2016 GEES MILL ROAD. N.E. CONYERS, GA 30013
  14. UMS COMPLAINT(47251157) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DOVER CORPORATION 50 WEST BROAD STREET COLUMBUS, OH 43215
  15. UMS COMPLAINT(47251156) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 4400 EASTON COMMONS WAY SUITE 125 COLUMBUS, OH 43219
  16. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  17. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  18. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  19. RIT FEE
  20. RIT FEE
  21. RIT FEE
  22. UDGE NANCY A FUERST ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  23. EGAL RESEARCH
  24. EGAL NEWS
  25. EGAL AID
  26. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  27. OMPUTER FEE
  28. LERK'S FEE
  29. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID CHARLES V LONGO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more