Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Appeal Court

Court

Nevada Appeal Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-10-09
Status Case Closed
Type Criminal Appeal Life Direct
Docket 7 entries
Disposition order the judgment

Docket Entries

  1. Case Closed.(COA)
  2. Filed Appellant's Proper Person Motion for En Banc Reconsideration to Dismiss Counsel. (Coa) (INCORRECTLY FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, TRANSFERRED DOCUMENT TO THE SUPREME COURT)
  3. Returned Unfiled Document "Affidavit." (COA).
  4. Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." COA-MG/BB/DW. (COA)
  5. Filed Order Denying Motion. Appellant has filed a second motion requesting that the en banc court reconsider the order denying her motion to discharge appointed counsel and appoint substitute counsel. En banc reconsideration may be requested when seeking review of a decision of a panel of the Supreme Court. Here, appellant is seeking review of the action of a single justice, not a panel of this court. Thus, her request for en banc reconsideration is inappropriate, and is therefore denied.To the extent that appellant's motion can be construed as seeking reconsideration of this court's June 30, 2023, order entered by a single justice, it is likewise denied. Appellant shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve any petition for rehearing or review. (COA)
  6. Returned Unfiled Documents. (SC)
  7. Transferred to Supreme Court.(COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more