Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-07-21
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 27 entries
Disposition uncontested

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Esqueda, Shonna M
Photo of Hon. Pebet Noelle

Judge

Hon. Pebet Noelle

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Appeared in Person
  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Proof of Service Comment Served: Shonna M Esqueda. Sub Service, Mailed on
  4. Amended Summons and Complaint Comment 1st Amended
  5. Proof of Service Comment Date Served: Served: Shonna M Esqueda
  6. Request to Enter Default
  7. Declaration for Default or Uncontested Judgment
  8. Judgment Regarding Parental Obligation - FL630
  9. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Party Served:Shonna M. Esqueda and Anthony J. Adame III Date Mailed:
  10. Notice of Motion Comment Correct Judgment / Hrg: 4/29/2025 @ 8:00am Dept 302
  11. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served Motion by mail to: Anthony J Adame III on .
  12. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment Correct Judgment Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  13. Appeared in Person
  14. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Shonna M Esqueda. Mailed on
  15. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Parties served: Shonna M Esqueda and Anthony J Adame, III/ Date mailed:
  16. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment Cont'd from to perfect notice; To Correct 01/23/25 Judgment Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  17. Appeared in Person
  18. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Parties Served: Anthony J Adame III, Esquida Shonna; Service by Mail; .
  19. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Party Served: Shonna M Esqueda; Service by Mail; .
  20. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment (RJ , perfect service as to Resp, cont to correct 01/23/25 judgment) Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  21. Appeared in Person
  22. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Shonna M Esqueda & Anthony J Adame III
  23. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment (cnt frm - -JR 4/1/25, perfect service as to Resp, cont to correct 1/23/25 judgment) Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  24. Appeared in Person
  25. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Shonna M Adame / Mailed:
  26. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Served: Anthony J Adame III. Mailed on
  27. General Motion Original Type General Motion Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle Hearing Time 8:00 AM Result Heard Comment cont from to perfect service to Resp Parties Present Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.