Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 41(e) - 2 years
- Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 41(e) - 5 years
- Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 4(i)
- Unlawful Detainer - $5,000.01 to $10,000.00 COMPLAINT FOR UNLAWFUL DETAINER
- Civil Summons Issued (Efiling)
- Application and Affidavit-Order to Show Cause and Shorten EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A TEMPORARY WRIT OF RESTITUTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE AND ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
- Notice of Appearance Notice of Appearance
- Answer Answer to Unlawful Detainer
- Motion Motion to Stay Unlawful Detainer
- Opposition OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY MATTER PREVENTING EVICTION UNTIL RESOLUTION OF CASE NO. A-22-846532-P
- Opposition SECOND PART - OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY MATTER PREVENTING EVICTION UNTIL RESOLUTION OF CASE NO. A-22-846532-P
- Notice of Hearing Notice of Hearing
- Motion MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
- Reply REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY MATTER PREVENTING EVICTION UNTIL RESOLUTION OF CASE NO: A-22-846532-P
- Opposition REBUTTAL TO: REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY MATTER PREVENTING EVICTION UNTIL RESOLUTION OF CASE NO: A-22-846532-P
- Opposition REBUTTAL TO: REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY MATTER PREVENTING EVICTION UNTIL RESOLUTION OF CASE NO: A-22-846532-P
- Civil Motion (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Stratton, Melissa) Defendant's Motion to Stay Result: Matter Heard
- Notice of Appearance Notice of Appearance
- Notice of Entry Notice of Entry of Order
- Motion Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration
- Order Order 1) Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 2) Denying Request for Bond
- Order Order 1) Granting Defendant's Motion to Stay until June 4, 2022 2) Order Striking the May 24, 2022 "Order"
- Application-OSC Why Writ of Restitution Should not Issue Application - Order to Show Cause Why a Temporary Writ of Restitution Should Not Issue
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In