Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-10-28
Type Protective Order
Docket 38 entries
Disposition dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Angulo Iribe, Norma Alicia,
Defendant Mondragon, Joel,
Photo of Hon. Doss Julie

Judge

Hon. Doss Julie

Tulsa County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. SEIBERT, APRIL (FD-21-2686): PETITIONER PRESENT REPRESENTED BY LUIS FLORES; RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY JUSTIN RINCK; SETTING CONDUCTED IN-PERSON; RESPONDENT COUNSEL TO FILE MOTION TO WITHDRAW; NO OBJECTIONS; THE COURT APPROVES THE MEDIATED AGREEMENT; AGREEMENT APPEARS TO BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE MINOR CHILDREN AND A FAIR AND EQUITABLE DIVISION OF DEBTS/ASSETS; ATTORNEY FLORES TO SUBMIT ORDER ALONG WITH AN ORDER SETTING HEARING; PO-21-3547 DISMISSED PURSUANT TO COURT APPROVING MEDIATED AGREEMENT;
  2. PROTECTIVE ORDER
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. PETITION
  5. LAW LIBRARY FEE
  6. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
  7. OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  8. OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  9. SHERIFF'S SERVICE FEE FOR COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  10. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  11. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTION
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REVOLVING FUND - INTERPRETER AND TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $1.55 COLLECTIONS
  14. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $5 COLLECTIONS
  15. DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COURTHOUSE SECURITY PER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORDS MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FEE
  17. COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
  18. EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED
  19. ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  20. JUDGE JULIE C DOSS: UPON SWORN AFFIDAVIT, THE EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER GRANTED FOR SELF CHILDREN, SET FOR 11/10/2021 AT 9:00AM, JUDGE DOSS. ON VIDEO. DEFENDANT IS TO REMAIN 100 YARDS FROM THE PLAINTIFF , CHILDREN , DOG AND THE PLAINTIFF'S HOME AT ALL TIMES. DEFENDANT IS TO SURRENDER ALL FIREARMS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT.
  21. OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE PROTECTIVE ORDER TO THIS CASE.
  22. EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER SERVED/DF/11-4-2021/TCSO
  23. JUDGE JULIE C DOSS: PLAINTIFF NOT PRESENT, REPRESENTED BY LUIS FLORES, PRESENT, DEFENDANT APPEARS ON MICROSOFT TEAMS, EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER CONTINUED AND SET FOR 11/24/2021 AT 10:30AM JUDGE DOSS. ON VIDEO. PLAINTIFF'S PASS TO FILE IN FAMILY. DEFENDANT HAD A INTERPRETER, SHARI CASTRO,
  24. CONTINUED EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED
  25. JUDGE JULIE DOSS: THE PLAINTIFF WAS REPRESENTED BY LUIS FLORES. THE DEFENDANT WAS PRESENT, PRO SE. THIS CASE, PO-21-3547, IS CONSOLIDATED WITH FD-21-2686 AND WILL BE HEARD BY JUDGE SPARKMAN ON 12-7-21 AT 9AM IN COURTROOM 378.
  26. ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND NOTICE OF TRANSER
  27. CONTINUED EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED
  28. ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND NOTICE OF TRANSFER
  29. SPARKMAN, RODNEY (FD-21-2686): PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY LUIS FLORES; RESPONDENT PRESENT REPRESENTED BY JUSTIN RINCK; SETTING CONDUCTED VIA BLUEJEANS; ATTORNEY RINCK ACCEPTS SERVICE ON UNDERLYING DIVORCE CASE; PARTIES AGREE TO CONTINUE PROTECTIVE ORDER PO-21-3547 TO 3-22-22 3:00 PM STATUS VIA BLUEJEANS;
  30. CONTINUED EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED
  31. SEIBERT, APRIL (FD-21-2686): PETITIONER PRESENT REPRESENTED BY LUIS FLORES; RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY JUSTIN RINCK; SETTING CONDUCTED VIA TEAMS; PO-21-3547 CONTINUED TO 6-21-22 9:30 AM VIA TEAMS; PARTIES ORDERED TO MEDIATION WITHIN 30-45 DAYS;
  32. CONTINUED EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED
  33. SEIBERT, APRIL (FD-21-2686): PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY LUIS FLORES (VIA TEAMS); RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY JUSTIN RINCK (IN PERSON); ATTORNEY RINCK ACCEPTS SERVICE; RESPONSE IS TO BE FILED BY END OF NEXT WEEK; PARTIES AGREE TO ATTEND MEDIATION; PO-21-3547 CONTINUED 90 DAYS FOR A STATUS ON 9-13-22 10:15 AM VIA TEAMS;
  34. CONTINUED EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED
  35. SEIBERT, APRIL (FD-21-2686): PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY LUIS FLORES; RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY JUSTIN RINCK; SETTING CONDUCTED VIA TEAMS; ATTORNEY RINCK TO FILE RESPONSES WITHIN 10 DAYS; PO-21-3547 IS CONTINUED FOR 90 DAYS TO 12-13-22 9:45 AM;
  36. CONTINUED EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED
  37. SEIBERT, APRIL (FD-21-2686): PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY LUIS FLORES; RESPONDENT REPRESENTED BY JUSTIN RINCK; SETTING CONDUCTED VIA TEAMS; RESPONDENT IS TO PROVIDE INCOME INFORMATION WITHIN 10 DAYS; ATTORNEY FLORES TO FILE A MOTION TO SETTLE IF NOT RECEIVED; PRESENTMENT/STATUS SET 2-27-23 10:00; PO-21-3547 CONTINUED TO 2-27-23;
  38. CONTINUED EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER ISSUED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more