Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-01
Status CLOSED
Type Other Circuit Civil
Docket 57 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Andrews, Denise Rae
Defendant Wilkins, John David Ph D
Photo of Hon. Shackelford Jan

Judge

Hon. Shackelford Jan

Escambia County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. RDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE - RECORDED (OR.9086.406. / 2023101759)
  2. ASE CLOSED
  3. RDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
  4. RDER OF HEARING SIGNED BY JUDGE
  5. EFENDANTS RESPONSE/ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS "SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT"
  6. RDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  7. OTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY
  8. RDER OF HEARING
  9. EQUEST FOR HEARING
  10. EFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS LATE "SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT"
  11. ECOND AMENDED PETITION
  12. RDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  13. MENDED ORDER OF HEARING
  14. RDER OF HEARING
  15. OTION TO RESTRICT ABUSIVE & VEXATIOUS LITIGATION
  16. HACKELFORD, JAN ...: ASSIGNED
  17. OTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY
  18. OTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY
  19. RDER OF RECUSAL -REASSIGNED TO DIVISION E
  20. VIDENCE
  21. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  22. NSWER FROM DENISE RAE ANDREWS PRO SE
  23. EQUESTING THE SUPPLEMENT PREPARED OF THE ENTIRE DIVORCE CASE OF THE PARTIES FROM THE LOWER TRIBUNAL AND REQUEST OF THE APPEAL RECORD DISMISSED
  24. VIDENCE FOR THE CIVIL CASE AND FOR THE MOTION REQUESTING PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PREVENT HARASSMENT INTIMIDATION, COERCION
  25. RO SE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FILED BY DENISE RAE ANDREWS
  26. RDER SETTING HEARING
  27. OTICE OF FINAL SERVICE
  28. DEFENDANT’S (JOHN DAVID WILKINS) RESPONSE TO THE PLAINTIFF’S (DENISE RAE ANDREWS) MOTION FOR A “PROTECTIVE ORDER” AGAINST THE DEFENDANT.
  29. OTION FOR ORDER REQUEST PROTECTIVE ORDER OF THE DEFENDANT
  30. EFENDANTS RESPONSE, MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS -- PRO SE
  31. EFENDANTS RESPONSE, MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS -- PRO SE
  32. FFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS FILED WITH CLERK DETERMINING THAT APPLICANT IS INDIGENT
  33. RDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  34. UMMONS ISSUED
  35. MENDED COMPLAINT
  36. EQUEST CORRESPONDENCE SUMMONS
  37. IVIL COVER SHEET
  38. RDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TREAT CASE AS COMPLEX GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE FOR THE PLAINTIFF TO REFILE WITIN 60 DAYS
  39. RO SE MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND MOTION TO DISMISS FROM DENISE RAE ANDEREWS
  40. OTION TO WITHDRAW CIVIL ACTION AND DISMISS HEARING SCHEDULED PER ORDER ON APRIL 13, 2022
  41. ROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
  42. RDER SETTING HEARING REGARDING COMPLEX ISSUES
  43. UMMONS RETURNED SERVED
  44. OTICE OF FINAL SERVICE AND PROPOSES CASE IS COMPLEX (DUPLICATE)
  45. OTICE OF FINAL SERVICE AND PROPOSES CASE IS COMPLEX (DUPLICATE)
  46. OTION TO REMOVE OR RECUSE (PRO SE) (DUPLICATE)
  47. NSWER AND PRO SE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND DISMISSAL
  48. OTICE OF FINAL SERVICE AND PROPOSES CASE IS COMPLEX (DUPLICATE)
  49. OTICE OF FINAL SERVICE AND PROPOSES CASE IS COMPLEX
  50. OTION TO REMOVE OR RECUSE (PRO SE)
  51. RDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  52. FFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS FILED WITH CLERK DETERMINING THAT APPLICANT IS INDIGENT
  53. PPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF CIVIL INDIGENT STATUS
  54. SUMMONS ISSUED
  55. CORRESPONDENCE FILED FOR REQUESTING SUMMONS
  56. COMPLAINT
  57. DANNHEISSER., THOMAS: ASSIGNED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase