Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Escambia County

Court

Escambia County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-20
Status CLOSED
Type Insurance Claim
Docket 46 entries
Disposition voluntary dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Carr, Timothy
Defendant United Property And Casualty Insurance Company
Photo of Hon. [ N Civil ] Williams, Thomas H

Judge

Hon. [ N Civil ] Williams, Thomas H

Escambia County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE CLOSED
  2. OTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  3. GREED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE
  4. OTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION
  5. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS
  6. DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF DEFENDANT’S CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  7. MENDED NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF DEFENDANTS CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE
  8. RDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF MUTIPLE WITNESSES
  9. DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS AND MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  10. DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
  11. OTICE OF TAKING VIDEO DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF DEFENDANTS CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE
  12. ECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOCONFERENCE DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM
  13. MENDED NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOCONFERENCE DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM
  14. MENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
  15. OTICE OF HEARING
  16. RDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT 1 OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
  17. RDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  18. LAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION OF MULTIPLE WITNESSES
  19. OTICE OF HEARING
  20. OTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
  21. OTICE OF CANCELLATION OF DEPOSITION
  22. LAINTIFS NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS INTERROGATORIES
  23. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  24. OTICE OF TAKING VIDEOCONFERENCE DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM
  25. OTICE OF SERVICE OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT ON PLAINTIFF TIMOTHY CARR
  26. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF TIMOTHY CARR
  27. EFENDANTS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  28. NITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER- GENERAL
  29. DEFENDANT’S AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  30. EFENDANT'S PRIVILEGE LOG
  31. EFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  32. DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
  33. LAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  34. PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
  35. DEFENDANT’S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I
  36. [email protected]
  37. RDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  38. UMMONS ISSUED
  39. AYMENT $410.00 RECEIPT #2021074293
  40. LAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: RUDD, MICHAEL P ASSIGNED
  41. ERGOSH, GARY L: ASSIGNED
  42. LAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT
  43. LAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
  44. OMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
  45. ROPOSED SUMMONS
  46. IVIL COVER SHEET

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more