Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-28
Type Cc Arbitration Filed
Docket 25 entries
Disposition default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Stinson, Llp|Bass, James D|Buchheit, Zachary Thomas
Defendant Insitor Asset Management, Lp|Iam Farmland, Lp|Iam Agribusiness Lp|Iam Global Ag Tech, Lp|Iam General Partner Llc|Iam Advisors Llc
Photo of Hon. Cunningham Heather Rene

Judge

Hon. Cunningham Heather Rene

St. Louis County (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. udge Assigned DIV 33
  2. efault Judgment DEFAULT JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON ITS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS IS HEREBY GRANTED INITS ENTIRETY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF LAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANTS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $115,050.48, WHICH INCLUDES: A) $106,342.50 IN COMPENSATORY DAMAGES; B)$8,500.00 IN ATTORNEY'S FEES; AND C)$207.98 IN COSTS. SO ORDERED: JUDGE KRISTA S. PEYTON Associated Entries: 01/07/2022 - Proposed Judmt/Dec Dis Filed +
  4. otice of Hearing Filed Filed By: ZACHARY THOMAS BUCHHEIT On Behalf Of: STINSON, LLP
  5. ntry of Appearance Filed Entry of Appearance; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ZACHARY THOMAS BUCHHEIT
  7. roposed Judmt/Dec Dis Filed Proposed Default Judgment. Filed By: JAMES D BASS Associated Entries: 03/03/2022 - Default Judgment +
  8. otion for Default Judgment Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment Against All Defendants; Exhibit A; Exhibit B. Filed By: JAMES D BASS On Behalf Of: STINSON, LLP
  9. gent Served Document ID - 21-SMOS-977; Served To - IAM ADVISORS LLC; Server - ; Served Date - 29-OCT-21; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  10. gent Served Document ID - 21-SMOS-975; Served To - IAM GLOBAL AG TECH, LP; Server - ; Served Date - 29-OCT-21; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  11. gent Served Document ID - 21-SMOS-973; Served To - IAM FARMLAND, LP; Server - ; Served Date - 29-OCT-21; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  12. gent Served Document ID - 21-SMOS-976; Served To - IAM GENERAL PARTNER LLC; Server - ; Served Date - 29-OCT-21; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  13. gent Served Document ID - 21-SMOS-974; Served To - IAM AGRIBUSINESS LP; Server - ; Served Date - 29-OCT-21; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  14. gent Served Document ID - 21-SMOS-972; Served To - INSITOR ASSET MANAGEMENT, LP; Server - ; Served Date - 29-OCT-21; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
  15. otice of Service Affidavits of Service for all Defendants. Filed By: JAMES D BASS On Behalf Of: STINSON, LLP
  16. umm Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S Document ID: 21-SMOS-977, for IAM ADVISORS LLC.Summons Attached in PDF Form for Attorney to Retrieve from Secure Case.Net and Process for Service.
  17. umm Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S Document ID: 21-SMOS-976, for IAM GENERAL PARTNER LLC.Summons Attached in PDF Form for Attorney to Retrieve from Secure Case.Net and Process for Service.
  18. umm Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S Document ID: 21-SMOS-975, for IAM GLOBAL AG TECH, LP.Summons Attached in PDF Form for Attorney to Retrieve from Secure Case.Net and Process for Service.
  19. umm Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S Document ID: 21-SMOS-974, for IAM AGRIBUSINESS LP.Summons Attached in PDF Form for Attorney to Retrieve from Secure Case.Net and Process for Service.
  20. umm Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S Document ID: 21-SMOS-973, for IAM FARMLAND, LP.Summons Attached in PDF Form for Attorney to Retrieve from Secure Case.Net and Process for Service.
  21. umm Issd- Circ Pers Serv O/S Document ID: 21-SMOS-972, for INSITOR ASSET MANAGEMENT, LP.Summons Attached in PDF Form for Attorney to Retrieve from Secure Case.Net and Process for Service.
  22. emorandum Filed Memorandum to the Court. Filed By: JAMES D BASS On Behalf Of: STINSON, LLP
  23. udge/Clerk - Note NO SUMMONS ISSUED DUE TO THE PETITION MISSING EACH DEFENDANT'S SERVICE ADDRESSES. E-FILE A MEMO INCLUDING EACH DEFENDANT'S SERVICE ADDRESSES SO THE CASE CAN BE FURTHER PROCESSED. FOR FUTURE REFERENCE, ALL DFT'S SERVICE ADDRESSES MUST BE LISTED ON THE PETITION UNDER THE DFT'S NAME. ALSO, IF THE SUMMONS ARE BEING SERVED BY ST LOUIS COUNTY SHERIFF, INCLUDE THE SERVICE FEES ($36 PER DFT). IF USING A SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER, Per Local Rule 28 (E), you must submit the "Request for Appointment of Process Server" form, which can be found on the St. Louis County Court's Web Site.
  24. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: JAMES D BASS
  25. et Filed in Circuit Ct Petition for Confirmation of Arbitration Award and Entry of Judgment; Exhibit 1 - Demand for Arbitration; Exhibit 2 - Stinson-Insitor Settlement Agreement; Exhibit 3 - Consent Award 26649. Filed By: JAMES D BASS On Behalf Of: STINSON, LLP

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more