Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Las Vegas Township Justice Court

Court

Las Vegas Township Justice Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-16
Status Closed
Type Civil Unlawful Detainer
Docket 42 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rulon Earl Mobile Home Park
Defendant Olsen, Janice L.
Photo of Hon. Stratton, Melissa) : Tiara Sherman (defendant) : Richland Holdings Inc (plaintiff) : 12/07/2018, Docketed: 12/07/2018 : 1,291.80

Judge

Hon. Stratton, Melissa) : Tiara Sherman (defendant) : Richland Holdings Inc (plaintiff) : 12/07/2018, Docketed: 12/07/2018 : 1,291.80

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Order for Judgment (Judicial Officer: Stratton, Melissa) Debtors: Janice L. Olsen (Defendant) Creditors: Rulon Earl Mobile Home Park (Plaintiff) Judgment: 08/11/2022, Docketed: 08/11/2022 Total Judgment: 1,198.00
  2. Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 41(e) - 2 years
  3. Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 41(e) - 5 years
  4. Start Time Tracking: JCRCP 4(i) and 4(e)
  5. Unlawful Detainer - $2,500 or less Complaint for Unlawful Detainer $2500
  6. Affidavit in Support-Order to Show Cause and Shorten Time Ex Parte Application and Affidavit In Support of Order Shortening Time to Answer and In Support of Permanent Writ of Restitution
  7. Civil Summons Issued (Efiling)
  8. Order Shortening Time Order Shortening Time to Appear and Defend and Notice of Trial
  9. -Day Civil Summons Issued (Efiling)
  10. Civil Unlawful Detainer Trial (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Stratton, Melissa) Result: Matter Heard
  11. Affidavit of Service
  12. Start Time Tracking: Projected Return - 90 days PLAINTIFF EXHIBITS
  13. Motion Motion to appear telephonically
  14. Order Order Regarding Motion for Telephonic Appearance
  15. Civil Unlawful Detainer Trial (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Stratton, Melissa) Continued Result: Matter Heard
  16. Motion Motion to Appear Telephonically
  17. Order Order Regarding Motion for Telephonic Appearance
  18. Civil Unlawful Detainer Trial (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Stratton, Melissa) Continued Result: Matter Heard
  19. Motion Motion to Appear Telephonically
  20. Civil Unlawful Detainer Trial (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officers Pro Tempore, Judge, Zarcone, Justin) Result: Matter Heard
  21. Memorandum of Costs and Disbursements Memorandum of Fees, Costs, & Disbursements
  22. Judgment Judgment
  23. Permanent Writ of Restitution Issued Permanent Writ of Restitution
  24. Notice of Entry of Judgment Notice of Entry of Judgment
  25. Start Time Tracking: Projected Return - 90 days Plaintiff Exhibit
  26. Affidavit - Declaration Claiming Exemption From Execution Claim of Exemption From Execution
  27. Returned Correspondence Returned mail
  28. Satisfaction of Judgment MOTION FOR SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
  29. Certificate of Mailing CERT MAIL RECIEPT
  30. Certificate of Mailing CERT MAIL RECIEPT
  31. Documents in Support CASHIER'S CHECK FOR JUDGMENT
  32. Documents in Support For Satisfaction of Judgment Mot
  33. Order Order Setting Hearing
  34. General Request for Telephonic Hearing Motion to Appear Telephonically
  35. Order Order Regarding Motion for Telephonic Appearance
  36. Opposition Limited Opposition to Motion for Satisfaction of Judgment
  37. Civil Motion (1:00 PM) (Judicial Officers Pro Tempore, Judge, Hua, Jeannie) Defendant's Motion for Satisfaction of Judgment Result: Motion Granted
  38. Motion Motion to Set Aside Default and Default Judgment Pursuant To JCRCP 60 (b)-(C) and Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Hearing Pursuant to JCRCP 62(b)
  39. Opposition Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to (1) set aside default judgement pursuant to JCRCP 60(b)-(c) and (2) Motion to stay execution of judgment pending hearing pursuant to JCRCP 62(b)
  40. Order Order on Motion for Satisfaction of Judgment
  41. Order Order
  42. Administrative Reassignment to Department 1 Case reassigned from Department 4 (Judge Melissa Saragosa)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more